AnonD-9845, 05 Aug 2012Sometimes, i like to browse through articles that are bound to be pointless internet arguments... moreYes.. i agree with that.. they all care about their companies fame,pride, and profit... well as we all know.. business is business and.. that is the reason why they keep on arguing whos gonna be the best so to keep thier.. company on top of.. the other.. and gain millions.. to people...
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012Useless blabla talking. After n95,Nokia was dead,NO ONE WANTS THEIR SYMBIAN TOUCH regardless t... moreAnonymous explains very well.. Apple have absolute performance, beyond compare.. ''RETINA'' display is best for my iSight! I love their apps and features ''SIRI'' and ''iWallet''.
Dee, 05 Aug 2012I love my SGS3. I don't care if Samsung copied other as long Samsung made it better...I'll buy it!EXACTLY! Thats my point right there!
Who really cares who did it first? What matters is who's doing it BEST.....NOW!
People will always forget who did it first once someone comes along and better the original.
I love my SGS3. I don't care if Samsung copied other as long Samsung made it better...I'll buy it!
Apple Haters: Blah blah, Apple copied from LG Prada
Apple: the iphone was in development in 2003
Apple Haters: Erm, bah, we don't care....*mumbles to self and walks away*
Lol Samsung said it didn't copy under oath in court, then embarrassed by their own internal documents.
Sometimes, i like to browse through articles that are bound to be pointless internet arguments like this and i wonder, when is God gonna push the rapture button..
or if God doesn't exist, i wonder when will a massive asteroid or supernova gonna blast the earth out of the solar system..
oh and btw, those companies doesn't care about us arguing about who's gonna win the next courtcase, all they care about is how much profit will they get when the next quarter comes.
if they end up destroying each other then let them, we'll all end up using cheap nokias again, like old times..
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012Useless blabla talking. After n95,Nokia was dead,NO ONE WANTS THEIR SYMBIAN TOUCH regardless t... morejust keep saying that.. btw why dont donwload 10k Apps and pay 100k dollars.. i can download android apps any where what i want for FREE..
iphone is not anyone, is for people who wants to spend their money into nothing..
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012Interesting how Symbian/Nokia fans, Apple fans, Windows Phone fans, Blackberry fans, and WebOS... moreDoes it also explain why despite samsung "coping" apple more people prefer to buy a samsung device than one made by the forbidden fruit company?
Same shit that happend with windows and Macintosh when they now took off....and look at where Microsoft is for today....MOSTLY BECAUSE of windows. I'm stating facts which is just history repeating itself really, I'm sorry if the truth hurts you so much.
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012We don't care crApple -- just stop suing people over things which you didn't actually invent.Sure enough that they don't invent it. But we never looked at touch-screen phone the way we did when the first iPhone was released.
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012We don't care crApple -- just stop suing people over things which you didn't actually invent.and we don't care plastic-copy too! Just shut-up and don't say nonsense you are not a xpert!
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012We don't care crApple -- just stop suing people over things which you didn't actually invent.Apple isn't suing over inventions... but on intellectual property. Look and feel. Design trademarks. Haven't you been paying attention?
THE APPLE NEWTON....
How quickly everyone forgets about Apple's Newton touchscreen PDA that began development back in 1987. Apple isn't exactly new to the touch input scene.
We don't care crApple -- just stop suing people over things which you didn't actually invent.
[deleted post]Interesting how Symbian/Nokia fans, Apple fans, Windows Phone fans, Blackberry fans, and WebOS fans are all pretty tame and respectful... But Android fans are the most insulting of others. Looks to me like the big school yard bully is Android these days. Or is it Samsung? Well typically bullies can't think for themselves (Samsung). So perhaps that explains it.
For everyone saying how the Prada was first... yes it was. But re-read the article, they say Apple may have been working on the iPad as early as 2003. I recall seeing a video, probably on youtube, where Steve Jobs was talking about this very thing... but I am thinking he may have said they were working on it long before 2003. This puts the iPad AND iPhone development long before many other devices of its type, including the Prada!!! As for being revolutionary... yes the iPad and iPhone were indeed revolutionary. To be "revolutionary you don't need to have invented the technology that is use. What you need to have is the best combination of elements and usability that makes people WANT the product. These other touch screens and devices that came before the iPhone simply didn't succeed, obviously. They all lacked the best combination of elements to make it successful. Sure marketing plays a role here, but LG was a very popular phone maker back around 2007... so why didn't the Prada catch on like the iPhone did? It lacked all of the right elements to make it successful.
I'm sure most people prefer physical keyboard, that's why RIM is still alive albeit barely. But a phone can only be so big and either the physical keyboard or big screen goto give way.
Anonymous, 05 Aug 2012Useless blabla talking. After n95,Nokia was dead,NO ONE WANTS THEIR SYMBIAN TOUCH regardless t... moreyou don't know what you're talking about! There are 2 type of touch screens- One is Resistive using Stylus like a pen and the other is Capacity using your finger and won't work with Stylus.Please get the fact before you go on and on for nothing!!!