DxOMark re-tests the iPhone 11, gets a much higher score Comments
- Anonymous
- TkN
Anonymous , 05 Dec 2020That is how a lot of people lie on their resume with fake numbers as their results. I don’t understand the analogy your trying to make?
In any event, if Apple paid for this, which I don’t think to be the case, but then I don’t have the gift of being right about everything all the time like some people on here. So I’ll at least acknowledge the possibility, if they paid for this then what the hell did they actually buy?
There is nothing here Apple can use. ‘Oh hey, look our year old device now has the 21st best camera in the world, according to a site very few actually take seriously’.
Hardly money well spent don’t you think?
- 113
- BPr
It's just like one took final exam. then the professor ch
- Note 20 Ultra
- tT1
thefearfulsilence, 05 Dec 2020I thought DXOmark were paid to score Apple phones low, not revise their scores upwards. Could ... moreThis is probably a mind game being played by Apple on the consumers since they don't officially selling iPhone 11s in their websites and stopped manufacturing them as well based on the reports of they are correct. It is like saying,, "see if iPhone 11 itself scores 119, think about 11 Pro" sort of message.... But people are getting cleverer.....
- Paid for Testing
- uS6
DxOMark gets paid for testing and review. Don't believe them !
- Anonymous
- q9A
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2020But you’ve all noticed anyway. ‘So, they bribed DXO to edit their scores’ were your words, imp... moreThat is how a lot of people lie on their resume with fake numbers as their results.
- Anonymous
- q9A
Jaeger, 05 Dec 2020Photograhy has something to do with objectivity, and a lot to do with subjectivity. A photo ca... moreThat is true, but what is the point of testing such as dxomark and displaymate when it comes to subjective like you said. Wouldn't that make the company baised?
- Jaeger
- KkE
Photograhy has something to do with objectivity, and a lot to do with subjectivity. A photo can be objectively good, but subjectively bad. It's all in the eyes of the beholder. For example, photos taken by a Huawei flagship tops photography benchmarks every year, but I read several comments about how oversaturated and unreal their photos look.
I wouldn't take DxO seriously, not for the alleged bribery from certain OEMs, but for the very nature of photograhy, more subjective than objective.
- Anonymous
- xq5
Buy any phone you like. Benchmarks and scores don't matter. Make sure your favorite phone isn't faulty one with many issues.
- Anonymous
- TkN
dyslexic alien, 05 Dec 2020If I were to bribe someone I would not jump to the top spot either. It would raise suspicion. ... moreBut you’ve all noticed anyway. ‘So, they bribed DXO to edit their scores’ were your words, implying that you just know exactly what has gone down here.
If I were Apple, I would be asking for a refund. After all, this device still only ranks 21st (would love to see them try to market that), and they didn’t fool anybody for a second anyway.
So what exactly did the money you all apparently know for sure changed hands here buy them?
- Anonymous
- srr
idk bro i think they should retest all phones
- dyslexic alien
- XSH
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2020It still ranks below a number of devices which can be had at cheaper price’s. I can see it ... moreIf I were to bribe someone I would not jump to the top spot either. It would raise suspicion. Doing it without people noticing anything is how they have always done their forced marketing. ¯\_ಠ_ಠ_/¯
- Tristanj
- 0tD
Actually, every smartphone that is being benchmarked at launch should be tested again after 6 months or 1 year. The fact is firmwares are vastly improved other weeks/months, especially on the photography side. DxO could update its tests more often, with each major firmware update.
- TheLastOracle
- KAR
Apple has grown a heart as big as the Chinese OEMs.
DXO Mark is happy, to accept their love and whatever else comes along.
- Anonymous
- 0cL
The iPhone 11 does produce really well-balanced photos. Its overall image quality is much better than most Chinese flagships and Apple's ecosystem and support are worth a lot, too.
- vvo
- B}L
DxOMark are so out of line in their tests. Obviously they are anything but objective sometimes.
- Anonymous
- TkN
dyslexic alien, 05 Dec 2020Yup the company wasn't happy with a low score. So, they bribed DXO to edit their scores. ... moreIt still ranks below a number of devices which can be had at cheaper price’s.
I can see it now ‘hey DXOmark, It’s the dark overlords of Apple speaking, here’s a bucket load of cash, can you move one of our previous devices slightly up the ranking list that nobody seems to care about. Cause as you all know, we are evil and all that.....’
Makes perfect sense (adjusts tinfoil hat)
- NotAnOpinion
- 4dt
Re-test?! Yeah right.
I'll say it was deliberate sabotage on iPhones from the start in favor for their Asian-paid deceivers just like DxO deceitful iPhone 12 review that many reviewers disputes against DxO very poor test on the 12.
I'm just suprised at, for one, that I'm posting in a stupid DxO thread that i had said I'll never give a DxO article the time of day anymore.
Two, seriously, why do you people still use DxO as a metric when this shill site has been caught lying for Asian OEMs by true professionals?
- dyslexic alien
- XSH
Yup the company wasn't happy with a low score. So, they bribed DXO to edit their scores. Hmm. Just like they bribe most mainstream websites. ಠ‿ಠ
Tip us
2.0m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up