Android Authority, 05 Dec 2020Lol... Are you saying a small 1/3" sensor with glass ziess lens will give better image qu... morePocket cams are 1/2.3".
Compacts 1".
My w830 surely does not delivery those crap images provided by 12 pro max in dayight.
Even at 1", phones will still lose against RX100.
Photos that look heavily edited ( samsung, apple) do not mean better.
Simple fact they have wrong colours already points to task failed.
Chill out dudes. Despite the 600mp gimmick, the thing is they are making almost 1 inch camera sensor into real. Soon i think they will release 1 inch 108 mp sensor which the result can be great
anonymous, 05 Dec 2020Meanwhile a Sony A7SIII only need to use a 12MP full frame sensor, hell, even their FX6 cinema... moreMore MP doesn't make you a better hardware, many factors(both in hardware and software) play a role about the image quality etc!
anonymous, 05 Dec 2020Meanwhile a Sony A7SIII only need to use a 12MP full frame sensor, hell, even their FX6 cinema... moreBut the Sony camera needs much more (optical) space instead :)
I know it is all about technology here(supposedly), but who gives a damn about number of pixels if your brain still wired to surroundings through your own eyes. Improvements endless - life is not. Enjoy your brain now!
Android--Master, 05 Dec 2020RX100 is a dead series.
The entire "point and shoot" segment has been destroyed by ... more Have Canon GX9mk2.
I believe it's one of the most portable point and shooters out there... It can't do miracles, and its AF ain't blazing fast as some smartphones (or sonys rx series for that matter) but it can take photos that just can't be achieved by a smartphone.
Can it beat my full-sized DSLR (full sized as in size, still aspc sensor) ? No, but l sure as hell ain't gonna carry that chunk on me all the time, so this seems like a reasonable compromise.
Smartphone photos look well on small screen, but put them on laptop and you'll start seeing the overprocessing, colors either unnatural or washed out, smearing, over sharpening, artifacts etc etc.
Meanwhile a Sony A7SIII only need to use a 12MP full frame sensor, hell, even their FX6 cinema camera just use a 10MP sensor. Let that sink in.
Android--Master, 05 Dec 2020RX100 is a dead series.
The entire "point and shoot" segment has been destroyed by ... moreMirrorless and DSLR are related to mirror.
Not restricted to big sensors.
Current rx100 has 24-200mm.
200mm while using 1", unlike phones using 1/4".
Not even counting way superior video skills.
Phones are just convenient, still poor quality compared to cameras.
Saw a video S20 ultra vs ZV1 , 4K video compared.
S20U was a huge joke besides the zv1.
Funny that even a 1/2.3" pocket cam can take photos without oil painting looking, no sharpening, no fake punchy colours.
The Kyocera I bought in 2004 never made ppl look like wax or sketch.
No, no, Samsung is preparing 600mp sensor for automotive industry. They never said it will be used on phones. Your source is confiusing facts where the sensor is used. No snapdragon will support that anytime soon.
Kinda unnecesary. 100MP is enough, I think it's better to have multiple reasonably sized cams, than one that bigđ
I thought Samsung were working on a. 1" 150mp camera sensor? is there any reason on earth why a 600mp camera on a phone would ever be useful or good quality? sadly I dont rate their current 108mp camera sensor at all on the Ultra, my note 10+ produced better images in most scenarios, Samsungs algorithms for processing are dreadful, I now have an iphone 12pro max and Note 20 ultra, as a long time android user, i will continue to be so due to the freedoms of the platform, but the camera on the iphone produces images that are quite a distance away and above ny N20U
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2020it is crying because it is having so much pain cause by laughing out loud.
do not compare gla... moreRX100 is a dead series.
The entire "point and shoot" segment has been destroyed by smartphone cameras.
Nobody buys them anymore.
Only a mirroless camera or a Dslr is ahead in terms of image quality.
Anonymous, 05 Dec 2020it is crying because it is having so much pain cause by laughing out loud. do not compare gla... moreLol... Are you saying a small 1/3" sensor with glass ziess lens will give better image quality than 1" sensors with plastic lens?
Then people blame 5G for the $200-300 price increase compared to previous year.
Such a camera would be able to replace 16mm ultra wide , 26mm wide and 112mm periscope tele, if the lens is very sharp and has an f-number of 2.5 with OIS.
Android Authority, 05 Dec 2020Sony RX100 must be crying for its mommy now! it is crying because it is having so much pain cause by laughing out loud.
do not compare glass zeiss lens with cheap china plastic lens used by samsung
wongwatt, 05 Dec 2020Pointless waste of development money.
Nobody needs more than 50MP on a sensor as small as a p... moreWith a 1/1.33" sensor, Samsung got effective pixel size similar to a 1" sensor by jumping to 108mp.
This sensor is 1/0.57", the effective pixel size will be even higher than a traditional 1/0.57" by jumping to 600MP.
You just can't fit big sensors in a smartphone without making the device too thick or having a huge camera bump. Hence the megapixel race.
AnonD-940827, 05 Dec 2020Still won't be better than any 20MP camera, because of the tiny sensor and cheap optics. ??? You are aware that a 600 megapixel sensor with 0.8 micrometer pixel pitch is larger than Aps-c? That's also why the lens would be so big.
Already nowadays the lens of the Xiaomi Note 10 captures approximately as much light per time as Canon Aps-c + wide angle kit lens. This camera would surely capture even more light per time.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up