Let's talk about Underdisplay camera.
QHD+ screen + camera hole vs FHD+ screen +underdisplay camera
Currently,the transparant area for underdisplay camera have 280PPI(pixel per inch) max.
For a 6.67in FHD+ display,like the one on Mi10 series,PPI is 310(since Pentile is only ~70% compare to normal RGB)
280PPI and 310PPI,you wont find any difference
But for QHD+ display at that size,PPI is over 400
400PPI and 280PPI,you will notice it easily.
At H2 2021 or even 2022,underdisplay camera suitable for QHD+ display can enter produced
ericwang, 22 Dec 2020main+ultra wide+telephoto marco
no depth on Mi11No the back camera setup is
Macro + depth + flash
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020Nope, not apple fanboy. Far from it. Apple's processor is faster, that's all. But it isnt?
Berserker, 22 Dec 2020No, those two are macro and depth modules 😂main+ultra wide+telephoto marco
no depth on Mi11
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020Nope, not apple fanboy. Far from it. Apple's processor is faster, that's all. Slightly faster but take a look at the price and design. iPhone 12 looks dated.
GeekBench has never represented the accurate Power or performance of Android.
Give me Antutu scores for an idea about real world performance compared to Snapdragon 865+
In the last test in Geekbench, Exynos 2100 got a multi core of 3963
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020SD888 still trails A14 (single core 1593 multi-core 3,849). Apple's cores are still much... moreIt's the real life experience who counts,and there is no much difference,because it's not only cpu what counts in Geekbench.... You can use your single core for your clock app in the background. Working and load times are almost identical on both OS'es.
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020I sincerely hope this is not a macro camera But what to expect from Xiaomi these daysNo, those two are macro and depth modules 😂
Wait wasn't xiaomi the one who said they will get next generation under-screen selfie cameras? or was it another company?
Another exensive punch hole trash seriusly whats IS difference on these phones?
J. , 22 Dec 2020Sure apple fanboy hahahaNope, not apple fanboy. Far from it. Apple's processor is faster, that's all.
888 finally caught up with A13 lol
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020SD888 still trails A14 (single core 1593 multi-core 3,849). Apple's cores are still much... moreSure apple fanboy hahaha
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020SD888 still trails A14 (single core 1593 multi-core 3,849). Apple's cores are still much... moreA14 isn't as fast as you see from Geekbench. It's because Geekbench was compiled using Apple own compiler - optimized. Doing the same with eg Intel compilier and SPEC gives 10-20% better result for Intel CPUs.
I sincerely hope this is not a macro camera
But what to expect from Xiaomi these days
SD888 still trails A14 (single core 1593 multi-core 3,849). Apple's cores are still much faster.
Don't worry about the scores there... Just hold on until the 888 is placed in a gaming phone like a red magic or something... Or if you can wait until the 888+ arrives... This is a very powerful SoC. Actually more powerful than the A14. Although Geek bench is good. It unfortunately measures SoC's differently to speed test G.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up