Well, this is good. Hope Samsung can improve their midrange exynos, too.
Nowadays, SD > Exynos > MTK is generally a rule. Perhaps this will change later down the road.
Android Authority, 22 Dec 2020Did I just hear you taking deep breaths?? afraid of the incoming future where this Exynos 2100... morehaha, i’m just pointing out that the scores are not on the website so how can it be real?
Guess you cant answer that.
Anyways, my iphone 12 pro max scores 4294 multi score and 1593 single core so still
leagues head :)
Anonymous, 22 Dec 2020strange, cant see this score on the geekbench website. Most likely fake. Search SM-G996B on... moreDid I just hear you taking deep breaths?? afraid of the incoming future where this Exynos 2100 is destroying your overrated A14 which scores favorably in GeekBench for iOS.
IpsDisplay, 22 Dec 2020What about sustained performance, thermals and efficiency??
Remember the 990 performed wo... moreAgree with you totally, especially for the first part
As for the second I don't know
Dragon will fight back. Waiting for speed test.
What about sustained performance, thermals and efficiency??
Remember the 990 performed worse than the midrange G90T last year...
Look at how Qualcomms plus versions (865+)of their flagships throttle back to the vanilla version with extended gameplay
Finally.... Exynos showing its true potential.
strange, cant see this score on the geekbench website.
Most likely fake. Search SM-G996B on geekbench and you will see..
In power consumption? Ofc. That's no news for anyone else than gsma.
Yeah yeah Benchmarks who cares the real world test will show if Exynos is power efficient
9ice. Exynos we await