NY Yankee , 23 Dec 2020Actually the Snapdragon 750 is the chip with least thermal throttling among all Snapdragon chi... moreYes but even snapdragons best
Looks like a throttling heat stove compared to the 800U :
https://youtu.be/tfxXVuX18Iw
exynos 2100 has few advantages to snapdragon 888
X1 cores clocked at 2.94ghz instead 2.84ghz
3x A78 cores clocked at 2.8ghz instead 2.4ghz
4x A55 cotes clocked at 2.4ghz instead 1.8ghz
also exynos has 8mb L3 cache instead 4 mb L3 cache
this does show exynos has a clear advantage but higher clockspeed more faster but more heat generated and power used
but then they is no big M cores that caused all issues
pretty much same setup as snapdragon but with higher clock speeds and mali gpu (possibly AMD more likely s22)
from this data the exynos likely cross 4000 multicore in final benchmarks and slight higher single core
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020A14 and exynos..both suck. throtling soc performance.
SD is better choice.Bro, its bcoz of a small change in fabrication architecture.
This time samsung stopped their own method and started the stock method (which snapdragon also uses)..
Thats why exynos 1080 and 2100 is clearly has a lead in performance..
Compaired to snapdragon performance:price ratio.
Now Clutter while using is bcoz of optimization issue propably
Samsung is a big tech giant... They are trying bro..
Give them some credit atleast for this time... They are trying hard this time.
Benchmarks are ok. But it's the real world performances that really matter. Will my phone struggle when a number of tasks are open, will my phone overheat as it's struggling to cope, will my battery life be weak as a consequence.
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020M1? What is the M1 going to do?? MacOS also known as Havoc OS makes it terrible to use. Doesn't matter anymore. Apple will be having windows, as soon they release their car.
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020M1? What is the M1 going to do?? MacOS also known as Havoc OS makes it terrible to use. Yup, you're a delusional Apple hater. That sentence alone tells me everything about you. Even biggest Apple nay sayers were amazed by M1 and you spit out this pile of drivel. LMAO
it will also lead in terms of more heat and more battery-consuming. typical Exynos
AnonD-804996, 23 Dec 2020Just like Apple's M1 right? Totally just a gimmick and not a showcase that Apple currentl... moreM1? What is the M1 going to do??
MacOS also known as Havoc OS makes it terrible to use.
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020Mobile chipset ranking on 2021
Exynos > snapdragon > mediatek > bionic
Sad to be... moreYes... Perfect.
A14 which is nothing but a Thermal throttling champ this year deserves to be last.
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020Mobile chipset ranking on 2021
Exynos > snapdragon > mediatek > bionic
Sad to be... morein terms of raw performance A14 is almost twice as fast, but then we have......the iPhone 12, the macbook induction cooker's younger cousin
cant even run genshin for 5 seconds before dying
Mobile chipset ranking on 2021
Exynos > snapdragon > mediatek > bionic
Sad to be an apple fans 😭
Wily2020, 23 Dec 2020"It's funny you say that as the 888 destroys the a14."
Stop dreaming, no it ... moreGeneration ahead cheap getting beaten by year old Android.
Nothing but a thermal throttling mess running outdated ecosystem of iOS
Wily2020, 23 Dec 2020"It's funny you say that as the 888 destroys the a14." Stop dreaming, no it ... moreas we know cross platform benchmark is bullshit.
AXZz-D, 23 Dec 2020I don't want to see anyone complaining about inferior performance in Europe if this is trueIt's true.
A14 and exynos..both suck. throtling soc performance.
SD is better choice.
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020It's funny you say that as the 888 destroys the a14."It's funny you say that as the 888 destroys the a14."
Stop dreaming, no it doesn't. A14 is generation ahead Any other mobile chip.
"As first detailed by AnandTech, the Snapdragon 888 chip earned a single-core score of 1,135 and a multi-core score of 3,794 in Geekbench 5 testing. The iPhone 12 Pro, which is powered by Apple’s A14 chip, scored 1,603 in single-core testing and 4,187 in multi-core testing.
As for the iPhone 11 Pro powered by the A13 chip, it scored 1,331 in single-core testing and 3,366 in multi-core testing. Thus, the Snapdragon 888 is actually able to best the A13 in multi-core testing, albeit just slightly.
Finally, Qualcomm also shared benchmark results from graphics testing using GFXBench. Here, the Snapdragon 888 recorded 86 frames-per-second, which places it behind the iPhone SE, iPhone 11 Series, and iPhone 12 series:"
I don't want to see anyone complaining about inferior performance in Europe if this is true
JT, 23 Dec 2020A14 is the king of overheating and throttling down haha!!! yes!
Anonymous, 23 Dec 2020This year,
A14 > Exynos 2100 > SD888 > Kirin 9000
That's just pure speed. ... moreActually ISP, GPU, NPU and various components of the Cache and Instruction Setup will ensure performance, apart from the Chip Artchitecture alone. Real World usage, and how these numbers translate to phones that actually perform better, instead of just being better at synthetic benchmarks.
It's much like Royole's FlexPai Foldable Phone or Oppo's first 5x Zoom phone, or ZTE's under display selfie camera. Each one is proof of rubbish, at its finest. All tech must be fine-tuned, and all figures must translate into real world usage.
Shourya karan, 23 Dec 2020A14 is the king of speed. Don’t see the unofficial speed tests and come to conclusion,just see... moreIt's funny you say that as the 888 destroys the a14.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up