Tigolebitties, 01 Jan 2021Nah. Mi 11 is a great all-rounder phone but it cameras won't beat the 12 pros. They don... moreIphone 12 doesn't have telephoto nor lidar. And since when this new invented lidar is a thing? Other companies used it, ditched it, brought it back and then ditched it again, yes this is the depth or 3d ToF sensor, but apple invented it 5 years later and gave it a weird name just like they do.
Tigolebitties, 01 Jan 2021How can the iphone 12 used an average hardware and handicapped software tho? They straight up ... moreThe 5 year update system of iOS is a giant scam. You get latest features 5 years late on an average. Android is light years ahead of iOS in terms of functionality, customizability, security and ease of use. Android from 5 years back can do things current iPhone can't.
iOS 14 finally got an app drawer and widgets, Lol these are things that existed on Android a decade back.
Plus with every subsequent update, your battery and cpu are deliberately slowed down by Apple (Yes, they are paying fines for this malpractice) whereby one is forced to upgrade after a few years.
Tigolebitties, 01 Jan 2021How can the iphone 12 used an average hardware and handicapped software tho? They straight up ... moreNothing wrong with stating how our android devices are, especially with all latest cutting edge tech. Combined with a superior ecosystem of apps, Just stating facts... Sorry if we Android fans touched a nerve... I Guess what we said is true.
Tigolebitties, 01 Jan 2021How can the iphone 12 used an average hardware and handicapped software tho? They straight up ... moreNot 5 years of updates, those updates are pure comedy.
What is the use of getting latest features a decade late?
Anonymous, 31 Dec 2020Bias comment with any knowledge ...
To start, DM has never tested any phone from Sony, LG a... moreIt is your comment that is biased.
Since it is a Xiaomi, it must be using inferior panel. This is what you think.
This is why in every thread, you are criticizing every other panel apart from Xperia 1 II, labeling them as not being as good as the Xperia, which is clearly not the case in real life.
Anonymous, 31 Dec 2020Mi 11 has better camera, better battery life, better fast charging, better feature rich softwa... moreNah. Mi 11 is a great all-rounder phone but it cameras won't beat the 12 pros. They don't even come with any telephoto/lidar lens.
Anonymous, 31 Dec 2020Premium Hardware + Premium Software = Best Experience. Mi 11 meets the requirement. With... moreHow can the iphone 12 used an average hardware and handicapped software tho? They straight up used the same camera, display and processor from the 12 pros. Plus, IOS ain't that bad rn. They're smooth enough even without any high refresh rate and they provide 5 years of major updates compares to 2-3 years from most of the androids.
PaidReviewer, 01 Jan 2021All this A+ won't do anything. Chinese phone displays are always washed out and bad looki... moreLul Motorola. I hope you didn't just come out of under a rock because Motorola is a Chinese company now.
PaidReviewer, 01 Jan 2021All this A+ won't do anything. Chinese phone displays are always washed out and bad looki... moreLol 30+35% samsung displays are made in china, Motorola owned by Chinese and Google is straight up garbage I meant pure unadulterated garbage.
All this A+ won't do anything. Chinese phone displays are always washed out and bad looking when compared to Samsung, Google or Motorola phones.
Almand, 01 Jan 2021It’s not necessary. But having them is a good extra bonus, in my opinion What are you taking abt???
It’s not necessary. But having them is a good extra bonus, in my opinion
Not a single mention of the manufacturer of the display panel.... the most crucial aspect of the article...... weak writing.
Anonymous, 31 Dec 2020Sony doesn't send their devices to DisplayMate since they are scared of getting exposed j... moreRather, they don't want to spend more money on awards that wouldn't really improve the overall greatness of their phones at the expense of higher prices.
And nah, DxOMark's new smartphone testing standards are just favoring computational photography too much, which is not what Sony is aiming for, hence the weak feedback.
Still, they're scoring decently for something that doesn't do as much processing on JPEGs as the other phones, so I could see its scores getting much higher once they adopt computational photography, but that depends on whether they'd give up treating Xperia as an Alpha phone (with Alpha style of image processing) and basically joining the trend of overprocessed images altogether, or sticking to their roots, but opening their hardware more for better Gcam support.
Either way, you really cannot say that they have bad cameras. Image quality is a preference after all, and labelling something as 'worst' because it's the least appealing to you is certainly an apparent bias against what Sony is doing.
Let's just say that it is not your cup of tea and settle things once and for all, because definitely the Xperia's image quality is FAR from being the worst.
Anyways, display is different from cameras. You can't possibly compare them head to head. If Sony did not want to have DisplayMate test out their phones, that's because they just didn't want to, and it's not because they're not confident of their own product, but rather just don't want to spend extra money just for awards that wouldn't really enhance the overall usability of the phones at the expense of increasing the prices due to that.
Either way, somebody else here has already showed enough proof of how good the displays of the Sony is, so I don't think I have to explain things much further here. Have a happy new year!
Anonymous, 01 Jan 2021SONY is light years far-away ahead with 4K displays !Not really light years ahead, but it's really worth seeing how their 4K panels would do on a proper testing. I really hope it won't be biased against them.
Probably the major weakness would be the low brightness levels, which would be addressed on the next generation.