Apple should concentrate on innovations rather than blaming someone else. Apple is afraid of samsung now because samsung is giving more to its consumers which apple can't give as they are interested in money!!
Simple bluetooth file transfer is not supported in apple which is rediculous!!!!!!!!!!!!
I won't be buying any apple products for a few years. I'll let my spending do the talking.
This is rich. Apple claiming Copyright infringement on ideas that were around before them, and were copyrighted by Nokia in the past like "search" and design traits they should look back and see that their phone stole a few design ideas as well, like they invented this stuff lol lmao
Rottenapple, 28 Aug 2012I wonder if Apple expected this amount of negative comments? The old saying "He who lives... moretrue mate even alot of apple supporters saying this was ridiculous, they have shot themselves in the foot on this one
I wonder if Apple expected this amount of negative comments? The old saying "He who lives in a glass house should not throw stones"
If I were Samsung, I would tell the US to f**K OFF, then carry on building the best smartphones in the world, and watch all the Yanks craving for a decent phone, they'll soon get fed up the crAPPLE products when they realise they have no choice!
It's a matter of time before Apple will fall. A company that's so insecure
Let shamesung tank, others like windows will catch on so it wont hurt competition this shame kid grew by copying first from sony, then apple and claimed innovation.....who wants to invest billions of dollars into research and have your ideas copied? Maybe the foreign shame kids think its ok. We will copy you and destroy you
by selling it cheap. Shame on you shame boys!
I work in a cellphone retail store in Belgium and I have to say, the only reason Samsung sells more than iPhone is because they simply have more devices on the market. Right now they have the galaxy S, S Plus, S Advance, S II, S III, Ace, Ace Duos, Ace Plus, Ace 2, Mini, Mini 2, Gio, Nexus, Pocket, Beam, X Cover, TXT, TXT Duos, Y, Y Duos. That's 20 Smartphones. Apple only has the 3Gs, 4 and the 4S, only 3... And still they're competing.
Apple prefers quality, Samsung goes for quantity.
Actually here is the real story..steve job dead, financial problem, why iphone 5 is late to come out in the market? (answer not enough bujet ..expensive material) how to get money for iphone 5? sue..samsung, they know samsung will just paid and never fight back)...if samsung paid them, iphone 5 will released..thank you to samsung.
I liked apple design all this time. But because of these patent things, new products will have limited design. Those patent was too general. NOW I HATE APPLE FOR IT..
Aaditya Bhatt, 28 Aug 2012that's exactly my point, Apple is not aiming to lower down the sales of the so called 'high-en... morefunniest thing ive heard all day... ' Besides everybody knows samsung believes in just capturing the market, apple is visionary!!...
reverse it bro.. who sued who??
LOL, good that apple did not patent the basic functionality of a phone. A device which you can hold in hand, keep close to your ears and talk using it with a person using telephone network :)
although i never liked apple nor i was a fan for apple nor samsung.
but what is going in the market is totally rubbish.
even if samsung had violated what is called patent, why apple hasn't asked itself the real question why people still bought more samsung especially galaxy mobiles than apple.
if apple has invented that thing why it hasn't kept that invention and developed it. in that case it would have continued to keep their customers and continued sales.
why sony for instance haven't done these actions all th previous ages in different industries tv,mobile,cassette, cd., etc.....
and why car manafactures especially japanese and german companies haven't done that againast korean.
i believe that this is going to harm apple more than it will benefit it and will cause more people to hate it more.
that's exactly my point, Apple is not aiming to lower down the sales of the so called 'high-end Galaxy' phones ,what is wroing is wrong,if apple was really scared then they would have definitely had S3 and other phones on the list, so if the list constitues 'OLD' phones, then samsung has nothing to worry,rather than counter-attack apple :) .. i like android,but i hate samsung droids, so much like iphones! Besides everybody knows samsung believes in just capturing the market, apple is visionary!!
I would call it a patent abuse.
Let's say Ford invented the first Car. Now, to overcome the rainfall, they invented windshield Wipers. If they patent the 'Wipers on cars' and barred anyone else from using it, no other automobile manufacturer would have existed today.
Similarly, Martin Cooper should sue all phone manufacturers including apple because he is the soul inventor of cell phone technology.
The world doesn't work like that :-|
As they rightly say, "If you can't compete with em, Sue em!!" ..lolzz
And for Mr Jobs, what was his take on copying other peoples' ideas... check this part of an interview:-
More than anything, patent granting shopuld actualy be the point where this needs to be fixed. The current system allows a company to patent an idea, even if they are not the first to use it, plus allows generic ideas themselves to be patented that are so vague that they can be virtually used to sue anyone for a multiutude of associated ideas. Apple' rounded-corners on squares - man, yep they mut have been the first to think of that... hmmm... Imagine if Mr Ford actually patented the idea of "an automobile"...
Somewhere along the way, the human race has lost sight of what is right.
Aaditya Bhatt, 28 Aug 2012first of all, Samsung is Much bigger,wide-scaled Company, so there's no question about Apple f... moreapple has once again lowered itself to a point where its now doing anything possible to stay on top
Aaditya Bhatt, 28 Aug 2012first of all, Samsung is Much bigger,wide-scaled Company, so there's no question about Apple f... moresamsung couldnt pull what off?
btw samsung makes phones of types (low ,mid and high end) to appeal to a broader market which is what im guessing your referring to (sub-standard) so whats your point??