JDK a.k.a NOT JUNIOR, 26 Jan 2021You think stacking ONE phone on top of the iPhone for reverse wireless charging will damage th... moreI don't think so. Just telling you their logic. Lol
[deleted post]lol you never actually answered WHY you would do that if iPhones don't have reverse wireless charging.
Dometalican, 25 Jan 20213 words: reverse wireless chargingYou think stacking ONE phone on top of the iPhone for reverse wireless charging will damage the back?
Besides, the back is the dual ion glass, the front is the ceramic shield.
i0S...Never...Again, 25 Jan 2021You are only considering pixel size.
In simpler terms, smaller pixel size = less light gather... moreGalaxy S21 Ultra 5G review is up, please have a look.
for instance, The default 12MP photos from the main camera are excellent, even if a bit OVER-SHARPENED for our taste. The resolved detail is plenty, the grass looks good, the dynamic range is outstanding most of the time, and the noise is pretty much non-existent.
Due to the BINNING process, some NPLEASANTNESS are visible in more complex areas like those balcony blinds and the wall decoration - these patterns don't look this way, at all. But that's a MATH PROBLEM that's dealt with approximations, and that's why we can't have the most complex patterns as realistic as we would have hope for. The EXCESSIVE SHARPENNING at times isn't helping this either.
The white balance and the color rendition on the S21 Ultra are very accurate, and that's a RARITY with Samsung's cameras. Often the processing goes overboard with the colors.
The unprocessed downscaled photos are even more impressive with an incredible level of detail, correct complex patterns, stop-on sharpness and outstanding grass. They could be a bit NOISIER due to the lack of processing.
The ultrawide photos are good, but NOT GREAT. They are often OVER-PROCESSED, and you can see a lot of the FINE DETAIL BEING WASHED OUT because of that.
AnonD-973296, 25 Jan 2021like whatshape, size, design, battery life, the huge notch on the 3XL 27mm lens is narrow for me, I prefer 24mm for the main. and the telephoto is only 50mm, etc
There's reason a good percentage people ask for FE 1) a more reasonable price device 2) Honestly, get a hint, VERY few people will take Exynos over the Qualcomm.... People want the Snapdragon.
SoniCocaine , 25 Jan 2021I need some help from anyone who knows a lot about androids. I have a Galaxy A51. It's a ... moreIf you don't care about microSD or smallish phone, you can always go for the Pixel 4a 5G. It's the same price, has stereo speakers, solid battery, great dual cam, and clean Android without excessive bloat. It's, IMHO, Google's best phone in 2020.
JDK a.k.a NOT JUNIOR, 25 Jan 2021Why will you ever stack phones on top of each other? Don't use dumb ideas like those t... more3 words: reverse wireless charging
Anonymous, 25 Jan 2021You literally changed your name to Not Junior?? ROFL 😂😂😂😂😁LOLOLOL, you don't even have a name, why complain about other's names?
[deleted post]Why will you ever stack phones on top of each other?
Don't use dumb ideas like those to justify your fanboi attitude.
I need some help from anyone who knows a lot about androids. I have a Galaxy A51. It's a good phone and have had for over a year. Already starting to get a bit laggy when texting with apps open in background. Phone feels expensive, nice camera, I think the main is like 48 or more. Micro came is awesome detail. Ok, lemme shut up and get to the point...I'm broke as hell, and I know the new ones look cheap but I'll just get a case regardless. With my verizon trade in, I can get the plus 5g for a little over $5 a month. I pay $27 a month right now. With all instant rebates and the trade in, the total would be $181 to own it outright. I know it sounds like a no brainier, but I don't wanna get a POS that's gonna overheat in 6 months. Tks for any help. Computers, I got this but android ..derrr
sohail shafayat, 25 Jan 2021Yes, Pixels are great at imaging but there are some cons with them as phone.like what
AnonD-973296, 25 Jan 2021i still think its the pixel that's the best shooter, but sure i will agree the mate 40 pr... moreYes, Pixels are great at imaging but there are some cons with them as phone.
Plastic is not the main problem as long as they use a reasonable compound that effectively protects the device in case of a fall. I particularly prefer to give up aesthetics for better protection. Excessive glass in the region of the camera lens is also unjustifiable. This large glass area only serves to scratch or break easily.
Having no expandable memory (SD card) is a deal breaker.. don't care how advanced the phone is.
sohail shafayat, 25 Jan 2021Yes, because Pixel pitch matters! No matter how large the sensor is, it's made off tiny l... morei still think its the pixel that's the best shooter, but sure i will agree the mate 40 pro+ does take pretty amazing photos
i0S...Never...Again, 25 Jan 2021You are only considering pixel size. In simpler terms, smaller pixel size = less light gather... moreYes, because Pixel pitch matters! No matter how large the sensor is, it's made off tiny little 0.8micron pixels, then, the more the mega pixels, the larger the sensor, yet, tiny pixels. Regarding IMX700, it still has 150% larger Pixel pitch than the pp in 108MP, 1.22micron. If Apple, Google or LG use this beast, Samsung will be blown away. Yet, the Mate 40 Pro+ is the best shooter till date. Just read the reviews on various sites.
JDK a.k.a NOT JUNIOR, 25 Jan 2021LOL glastic is still plastic. 50% glass and 50% plastic? whatever, it's worse build qu... moreYou literally changed your name to Not Junior?? ROFL 😂😂😂😂😁
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up