shizzil, 01 Sep 2012Samsung gona hit apple where it hurt as apple buy chip from samsung and samsung gona make ther... moreIf they lose Apples business they lose hundreds of millions of dollars so as pissed as they may be Apple earns them megabucks so they will just suck it up.
Apple better stop filing lawsuits and soon release your iphone.I hope apple is going to lose its market as they have no one like STEVE JOBS to do innovation
Anonymous, 01 Sep 2012all is true.... 1000%=Posting a reply to your OWN post to back yourself up anon??? The little t7Xh might have given the game away.
Anonymous, 01 Sep 2012Agree 101% scamsung are copycats!,If samsung is copycat why apple suing samsung if they believe that their products are original, in any comparison there's no better things than the original and apple believe samsung is better that's why they sue it.
get a life apple. and why just sammy? there are a million others with simillar features. is it because sammy is doing so well? greedy selfish lowlife apple.
Pick that phone which you can afford and which you think that upto mark.. Dont take these story as serious issue... Companies are making billions of money... So these cases are like tip for waiter... Enjoy...
Apple this is ridiculous. If its regarding the rectangular shape with rounded corners...what about LG, Huwaie, HTC & others....it is stupidity apple...nothing but saving your company in order to do so filling a case be the best way then....samsung must sue in return since it was the first phone to introduce homescreen button (forgot the model)..just because other company is rising before you...this isn't tge behaviour you must do.....filling case doesn't mean people will love you...in return more customers will be hating you...eith this ridiculous behaviour after Galaxy S III sales as outcasted yours....shame Apple shame...never expected this from you....
Techie, 01 Sep 2012Wow..a phone with SAMSUNG emblazoned over it is going to confuse American consumers with an Ip... morewell said buddy
wow! i cannot see differences between this LEVI'S jeans and that ZARA jeans. Hei, i think LEVI'S should sue ZARA for making look-alike jeans.
Oh but wait, hei, there;s the logo, and if i look closer they have different shades of blue
definitely those jury do not qualified as jury because they are deficient in IQ and judgement
And now Apple is adding more reasons for me to hate them. I actually can't believe this company is stooping so low. Shameful.
Do you remember iPAQ PDA from HP??? I think the first iDevice was HP's and Apple is using the naming method since then.
... I kinda hate what apple is doing, it is killing off healthy competition by force instead of innovating better, I'm a sony fan by the way, but I don't think the patent system must be abused this way, it will halt healty competition and promote monopoly, I certainly wouldn't buy an apple product to text or to call or to listen to music, there are cheaper alternatives to do that...
And the iphone 4/4s volume buttons look remarkably similar to those from the Sony Ericsson T610
XMAN, 01 Sep 2012samsung s3 looks nothing like a apple iphone ..ps the people who think samsung coped need your... moreAs long as Sammy, Apple will try whatever mean to stop the sale. Apple is getting desperate each day.
Shame on you Apple.
[deleted post]yea, and you should be banned from existence because you COPY your parents genes.
The late Steve Job's era was all about design and patent, did he really care what Samsung and all the other companies did? I dont think so bcoz he was capable of bringing devices to the market that cud not only just beat the competition but make the competition wish they had thot about that extra feature years ago.
Oh and then came Tim the Cook, and i get a feeling he may be running ouy ideas and thats why he is suing Samsung for almost everything from design to maybe the name "Samsung" may be next.
Who is better between Samsung and Apple? This should up to consumers to decide and not 10 person in court who is probably reading their verdict from an iPad.
Wow..a phone with SAMSUNG emblazoned over it is going to confuse American consumers with an Iphone that has no other distinguishing characteristics. The Jury must have a really poor opinion of American intelligence (and themselves) . Why was the same suit dismissed in the UK, South Korea and Japan? More intelligence the other side of the Atlantic and Pacific?