AnonD-24476, 25 Sep 2012Good phones from Nokia.. Already Asha series are super hit in Developing markets & Nokia h... morethese phones are not comparable to Cheap Serious. Galaxis has full smarthphone featurs. the only reason asha is taking over the galaxy y and etc are because galaxy serious has the worst battery life
ha ha ha.... if 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 being the features make up to a good phone... people are making 10 phones with one feature in each... Samsung did this first and now others are following.... its raining mobile phones but it is confusing people.... what is the use in having so many models... tell us Samsung, Nokia and others who follow this Strategy (or tragedy)
They may not be smartphones, but it's great to see featurephones offering a smartphone-like interface. Good to see Nokia making a consistent branding effort: "Asha" = featurephone, with half a dozen to choose from. "Lumia" = smartphone, with half a dozen to choose from.
Would love to see real-world battery life on these things. Would make a great schoolkids phone with games, WiFi connectivity, 2G for basic communication, miniSD to store music and a screen big enough to watch videos on the bus.
oh god....2-3years back this cud hav been a grt phone under 7-8k..but now when u can get xperia mini for just 8.5k from ebay,then who's gonna buy this outdated crap.even for 9k we can get xperia tipo...both these phones r 10000times better than this.wake up nokia!!!!asha
Good phones from Nokia.. Already Asha series are super hit in Developing markets & Nokia has again overtaken Samsung's low end Galaxy pocket, Galaxy Y with their Asha 311 & 305 in India.
Asha is a true Savior for Nokia..
ascetic, 25 Sep 2012OMG its a joke comparing SGS III with 308then why are you comparing high end phones from low end???
ascetic, 25 Sep 2012OMG its a joke comparing SGS III with 308Some People make the dumbest comments... Tsk,tsk,tsk!
Sam Sung, 25 Sep 2012Galaxy S III is better.samsung is better only in copying ....thats y apple ripped them off hahahaahhah
Sam Sung, 25 Sep 2012Galaxy S III is better.Some People make the dumbest comments... Tsk,tsk,tsk!
Sam Sung, 25 Sep 2012Galaxy S III is better.then what the hell u doing here u pathetic lagdroid fan........ u guys are even pathetic than the apple fan boys .....
Sam Sung, 25 Sep 2012Galaxy S III is better.how much does that cheap plastic phone lasts with full charge ? 2 hrs ... 3 hrs..... max 5 hours ???
Sam Sung, 25 Sep 2012Galaxy S III is better.And how much is this so called SGS3 exactly? unlocked-sim free. And how many Asha 308/309 you could buy with those money? (-_-)a
Great phone. Its a shame that it doesn't have 3G, it would be perfect.
Why are you guys comparing this phone - a Nokia Asha series to the Frigging top end Galaxy S3? We might as well compare it to the Iphone 5 and say it has Terrible Bench Mark Results.
nokia asha 311, 305 is simply waste of buy for music lovers... stay away from nokia asha series if you like to hear music in headphones even nokia old x2 or x3 is great... nokia asha is let down for music lovers, not even able to hear one song since noise and frequency response is high... buy as a simple touchscreen phone avoid this as a smartphone...