AnonD-30362, 11 Oct 2012Spec wise, this is no match for L820! hoard of cores but still laggy and shitty built. Lumia a... moreAnd OS wise? Did you come here to tell us to buy a restricted OS that doesnt let you do as you like with your own phone? iOS and WP, i really dont see the difference, restricted to the bone, totally unsuitable for most ppls usage.
Spec wise, this is no match for L820! hoard of cores but still laggy and shitty built. Lumia any day!
Jun, 11 Oct 2012Fanboys say that S3 is better than iPhone 5 as it has bigger screen than iPhone 5. When S3 ... morethe same can be said of apple fanboys too. every manufacturer has fanboys and crtics, but the specs dont lie, and the sIII has pretty damn fantastic specs...
Fanboys say that S3 is better than iPhone 5 as it has bigger screen than iPhone 5.
When S3 mini coming out, now they start praising 4-inch screen size. hahaha
whatever there is a Galaxy logo, fanboys will praise it
Anonymous, 11 Oct 2012Krishna, don't be surprised the specs publish here are accurate, in fact u can check out other... moreI prefer samsung galaxy s2 size with note 2 specifications...it will be a killer...smash iphone in no time...
Krishna, 11 Oct 2012I would be extremely surprised if these specs are accurate.
The leaked specs sound almost ide... moreKrishna, don't be surprised the specs publish here are accurate, in fact u can check out other website to confirm, www.soyacincau.com
Anonymous, 11 Oct 2012wtf! this is stupid....this won't sell well cause the screen size is only 4"!I would argue that it would sell MORE as it is "only" 4".
Guys don't get frustrated it's not for you... Look at the picture!!! It cute portable and decent powered... THIS IS A GIRLS PHONE!!!!!!!!!!! And it will sell like a charm!!! They will love and will pay extra for the nice looks .......
I would be extremely surprised if these specs are accurate.
The leaked specs sound almost identical to those of the Samsung Galaxy S Advance (I9070), which was released early this year. It would be illogical for Samsung to make an announcement for a phone that brings absolutely nothing new to the table.
This is such failed marketing 101. This phone would only serve to destroy the Galaxy S 3 name and confuse the mainstream. I wouldn't be surprised if people buys the mini thinking they have bought the actual S3 for cheap. Samsung is now gonna take the massive goodwill S3 generated and flush it down the toilet. Why give a mid ranged phone a top range phone name?
leaked specs may b wrong..
I hope it has a dual core krait....nd an eight mp camera......
djst, 11 Oct 2012It shouldn't be named Galaxy S III Mini because it's an Ace line phone, look at the code name ... moreSo its another indication that these specs are indeed wrong. I expect exynos quad or S4 dual and 8mp cam. But i dont have much hopes for the display, i bet they insist on using their beloved AMOLED once again, even with Pentile Samsung need size of 4.3 inch to make qHD resolution, and a qHD Pentile isnt clearer in small text than FWVGA anyway.
Yes, now I know that mu Galaxy S Advance is the same as the Galaxy S III mini :))))
4" inch screen would be perfect for me. But WVGA resolution? It should be qHD. :)
It shouldn't be named Galaxy S III Mini because it's an Ace line phone, look at the code name I8190, not I9***. Samsung is fooling people.
ALonZo, 11 Oct 2012It's called a Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini as it literally looks like a "Mini Me" version ... morewhy would people waste USD515 for the same phone name S-Advance that cost USD350 ?
4" Screen, 1 Ghz duo core, 1500mha batery, 5MP camera which is exactly S-Advance.
I can get my self a S2 with 4.3" screen, 1.2ghz duo core, 8MP camera, 1650mha battery at USD 450, why would i buy this ??