AnonD-50940, 02 Mar 2013Nokia was always a step behind and trying to copy Ericsson and Sony, they had to present their... moreThis was a good joke:))))). Yeah right. Nokia will be behind Sony when pigs will fly and cows lay eggs;). Now, go find something better to do. Be smarter then a troll;)
AnonD-50940, 02 Mar 2013Nokia was always a step behind and trying to copy Ericsson and Sony, they had to present their... morethey're working on "Nano-Technology" waterproofing you sony dummy fan, so your next xperia is gonna be a copy of nokia-p2i tech!
Anonymous, 01 Mar 2013Nokia set to make an android phone. now that's a headline.Ewww, why would you want to ruin Nokia like that?
iush, 02 Mar 2013are you an engineer? i am sure you are not and cores do not implement power.. x86 architecture... more4&8 core cpu's are really useless for mobile.....os does not use it fully.....if it uses means why android still laggy....
Nokia was always a step behind and trying to copy Ericsson and Sony, they had to present their version of xperia Z soon or later...
AnonD-107466, 02 Mar 2013Looks like some iFanDroids trying to troll Nokia fans hard..Finally, P2i has made it's way 2 a commercial device! There's been talk of P2i and other similar tech from rival companies which provides water proofing at the circuit level making it to major devices for the last couple years! Glad it's finally taking shape and this will spur other major phone makers to follow suit!
dream on, 02 Mar 2013Dream on samsung mobile is still in the top and even htc already dump you in junk and sony now... morethey're probably have to lay off employees or sell some of their assets again just to break even or to survive this year. LOL!
AnonD-31621, 02 Mar 2013Then you admit that your android is laggy as apple is crap. Thanks for your honesty.cant even keep up with android and ios, windows 8, just compete with RIM. nuff said.
Carol, 02 Mar 2013Man droids really like to hear them selves. So, to understand that you are a geek:))? After yo... moreI agree 100%, real world usage is what matters not specs. Nokia is unbeatable when it comes to reliable connections anytime anywhere, unlike others.
AnonD-27765, 01 Mar 2013Nokia makes the best hardware. Period.Dream on samsung mobile is still in the top and even htc already dump you in junk and sony now is gibfing the consistency and ryt ingdregint. Hmmp why nokia do you need to get a partnership if you telling us that ur phone is the best above all? Hehehe lol. Again a bad move, either or likewise, trolls of nokia go reply with my comments. Hehehe. ' innovation comes from the idea and action that no one think or act before. Ideally the concept they are doing ryt now are just short term goal not a long term goal. Well keep tryingnokia. I am very happy with sammy phone as my primary and sony as my secondary well my gs3 just win agaib and my sony xperia v is my phone to beat. Bhe
Now I remember my symbian days . Laggy and automatic force closes, that is benefit of symbian.
iush, 02 Mar 2013 2 years back people use to brag about saying who needs a dual core.. and now who needs a 4cor... moreAnd again, read my friend, read, then write. I think i SAID clearly that a dual core is more then enough;). Symbian works GREAT and fast with just an 1300mhz cpu and 512 RAM. A dual core with 1gb RAM would have crushed android and it's 4 cores like a bug;). And yes, dual core was useless for me, and still is. But market is market, and people want speed on sheet. Symbian can multitask more then 30 apps with the specs i just told you, I would like to see any other system doing that with that low specs. Not that there is a system doing real multitasking anyway. Besides android, which after 6 years of dumbness, got a multitasking option (a thing that makes a smartphone in the first place) that is still nothing in front of symbian. Now, learn about reality and leave those benchmarks alone. You maybe having some bad headaches from them;)
iush, 02 Mar 2013are you an engineer? i am sure you are not and cores do not implement power.. x86 architecture... moreMan droids really like to hear them selves. So, to understand that you are a geek:))? After you learn what that is, come back and tell me;) Now, BOY! First read carefully, then write. More reading less writing;). Have i compared x86/x64 cpu's with ARM cpu's? You got to have some serious fandroism stuck in your eyes. So you should consult a doctor. By the way, Symbian has more capabilities then crapdroid and doesn't require 100 cores. Tell me one thing android can do and symbian cannot, besides having a no ending list of useless apps. Minding the fact that android is a wannabe Symbian with a "sparkling" interface makes it even more a crappy as Chinese second hand system. Now, YOU read on Google and learn about the specs and about real life usage. Learn about what's the use of 4 cores, and please don't come here with that useless declaration that it will drain less battery due to not using any core at it's maximum:)))). That is a samdung gimmick and is called: BullS@!t all over. Second, yes, you may be browsing a bit faster and doing a job faster (The funny part is that this not so mighty s3 keeps having this wonder in wannabe tech world called: bottleneck, making it even slower in some cases in front of a lumia and a ios;))... USELESS. And even if it would have been super optimized for a quadcore and all apps and everything in it will take advantage of a quad-core cpu, there will still be a NO USE for this type of hardware in a smartphone. Now, that Android needs this cores just to keep it from lagging that is something else, and it's quite funny:)))). WHAT A CRAP. Anyway, there is a difference between paper and real life my friend. But, i don't expect you to know that;). You are to geek to learn. So, after learning and learning and learning, maybe you will get to understand what are the meanings of my words. Until then... bye bye.