A 4.2 inch display of the IPS LCD variety and a resolution of 1366*768p. Motorola Razr i design and build-quality. 2 GB of Ram and 16 GB of internal storage (expandable via micro-SD up to 64 GB). 8MP Sony Exmor RS camera with an F2.0 aperture and dual LED flash, and a wide-angle 2MP front-facing camera also F2.0. 2300 mAh Li-Po battery. Sapphire glass screen with capacitive buttons underneath the display so that the little display doesn't get smaller in usable space because of any sort of on-screen buttons. Pure Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean. Camera button. 4G LTE. And something like a BIG.little SoC that has a "little" CPU with a dual core 1.5 GHz Cortex A9 and a "BIG" CPU with a quad core 2.0 GHz Cortex A15 configuration. So a "six core" CPU and a PowerVR SGX544 MP4 GPU SoC. That would be a fantastic phone, and even though I personally like big smartphones, I see why this is needed.
Anonymous, 15 Apr 2013Samsung won't do it coz they are busy in making phones like MEGA .... Sony or HTC or Nokia can... moresamsung have screen size of all segments n above that it has a large amount of money to spend on RnD n it can anyday bring the device what the site is asking but samsung is not a fool that it will manufacture such a small phone for only a few people coz most people will prefer screen size of around/nearby 5"... those were ols days to have a flagship phone of 4.2" screens... todays market demands high screen sized flagship phone... if sony/htc/lg/moto/sammy anyone produces a flagship phone of that size, it will certainly kill its own market coz people who care for that size are less...
This is why I like Motorola. Very small bezel on both RAZR i/M and RAZR HD. Their 4.7" RAZR HD is smaller than many phones with 4.3" screens.
The JIAYU G4 (Advanced) is also very small with regards to width. It long, but you rarely hold it in landscape with one hand.
Hopefully X phone will be maximum 4.7" and with very slim bezel, even slimmer than RAZR HD. I think this is perfect screen size and phone size.
What about Sony Xperia SP and Sony Xperia L? They are perfect...
Samsung won't do it coz they are busy in making phones like MEGA .... Sony or HTC or Nokia can do it .
Quad core processor,
I hate this dildo industry mentality. Bigger is not better. There is a golden size for everything. Even for screens. There are already tablets out there. What do you need more?
Although I personally prefer 4.8"-5" screen with no/little bezel, those who demand smaller profile high-end droids have rights too. If such a droid is ever to be mass-produced in 2013, it will be a direct market competitor to Apple iPhone (which I think is rather full of marketing and fashion boasts than actual functionality). This slim droid is expected to sport top-notch Chip-set, premium design/build (definitely nothing like typical Samsung), high-end display of 1080p, stock android with at least 2 years update, fast connectivity, durable battery, powerful built in office (like Apple Notes or Microsoft Word and PPT), GPS and GLONAS, offline navigation, wast internal storage, capable cmos camera with led, powerful front camera, long list of sensors, HD display output, protective glass display (e.g. Gorilla, Contour), great audio and long list of accessories. Additional features such as water-resistant, expandable storage, FM radio, USB OTG, NFC, Metal body and user-replaceable battery will definitely win this small android a great victory in small-premium market.
Yes, please listen an make the phone I've been waiting for for a full year now !
Motorola Atrix had the ideal size... I wonder what's the problem of making mid-sized phones... HTC First looks good too... But not the high-end inner hardware... :(
Ya..i am indeed waiting for such a device..my preferences..
4 inch screen..
and the phone should be mid ranged...OBVIOUSLY...
Remember the XPERIA RAY a super smartphone ARC inside hardware and just 3.3" DISPLAY . That is one hell of a performance ! I`m sick of big , large smartphones . Maximum size for me is 4.0 DISPLAY . I want a smaller top android phone . I`ll await for Sony to do it !
Lesser size of the screen, means lesser amount of pixels to work with. Lesser amount of pixels means lesser requirement of resources. Lesser requirement of resources means there is completely no use in cramping all those raw processing power if it's not going to be utilized. It will be simply a waste of resources and money as all that raw power comes with a price.