Luxurious dual SIM Samsung S9402 Ego officially announced Comments

• samsul_hater
• tDAC
• 04 Dec 2008

It did fulfill one thing in the promise though. "EGO" surely describe the reason for person that is willing to pay 1800 US for such phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Bakhti
• iVF4
• 03 Dec 2008

Cheap Vertu knockoff. They didn't even bother to be slightly creative on the design of this thing.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• me
• pKJK
• 03 Dec 2008

the same as my name - "ego".lol

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Gigis
• pkGY
• 03 Dec 2008

what`s with that price? motorola aura and this wack phone won't be even the half of the 8800 arte series

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• haider...
• u1vE
• 03 Dec 2008

so ugly fone...
MOTOAURA rocks...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Vertu
• 3pbA
• 03 Dec 2008

you poor people...i pitty you...you have no taste of class at all...this phone is my dream phone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• u1v8
• 03 Dec 2008

the ugliest looking device ever made by samsung and that to supposedly high end. what a shame.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• ibX@
• 03 Dec 2008

the back side look like most of the nokia vertu o.0

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AmAn
• utuj
• 03 Dec 2008

Vertu's carbon copy.. try to do something diff buddies..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• MDV1
• 03 Dec 2008

althogh its called "luxurious" it sure doesn't look like it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Fone
• mpDV
• 03 Dec 2008

Wow, that doesn't look like a Vertu at all does it!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Karim
• pTKL
• 03 Dec 2008

horrendous phone!!,

looks like an Vertu (Nokia) wannabe!!!!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• kxCY
• 03 Dec 2008

this is a vertu copy cat, again samsung ripping of nokia 5 years later !!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• P433
• 03 Dec 2008

stylish.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Bill
• i2Gv
• 03 Dec 2008

Why do most of these so-called "luxury" phones have to look like crap?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 3C6U
• 03 Dec 2008

Anonymous, 03 Dec 2008... and by the way they could have put in more "samsung-design" than "vertu-design". unique ph... moreyea bro i looks exactly like a vertu, Samsung are so badly trya be No1... their throwin out every kinda phone there is... WinMo, Symbian, Cheap Linux or Flash Based Touch, Fashions phones and every phone is crap, excpt for the Omina and Inovate, even pixon is cheap, later homie

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mYSc
• 03 Dec 2008

... and by the way they could have put in more "samsung-design" than "vertu-design". unique phones isnt samsungs business as it seems, just like first poster said...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• kal
• vwdn
• 03 Dec 2008

So its not rhodium-plated as its been reported before? Anyways in my opinion the design could have been much better. Material used is exclusive..no doubt on that, features are good for a luxury model, however the design just doesn't go well with it's name "EGO". Just my thoughts. Cheers!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mYSc
• 03 Dec 2008

i dont know where samsung is heading. in 2 years i see it: low end mobile phone: "peter, q290384". middle segment: "berlin, fhu921". high end: "kamasutra, öä2303!". the bader the phones get, the uglyer they get, and the less memorizable the names get. maybe they dont want people to remember or to recognize their phones...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 3C2k
• 03 Dec 2008

jonathan, 03 Dec 2008man i thought i was first... lolzzz in any case, gr8 phone 4 rich ppl, i still love my n78homie i got N78 too! i love it man

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report