Tom-Helge, 16 Oct 2013But no one cares about USA anymore.They just want to support an American company which doesn't support back America, keeping all its billions offshore minimizing corporate tax to the US government. At least Samsung built a factory (not sure if more) in USA.
gam30toronto, 16 Oct 2013if apple "copied" all these features and even more (the idea of a mobile phone with ... moreITC did rule against Apple and imposed a ban. President Obama used an executive order to remove the ban. America at its best with double standards. So only Apple can ban and others can't ban Apple, and even if you "win", that win is negated by the American president.
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013being able to do and being able to do flawlessly has large difference. WinMo is worst mobile O... moreAnd the irony is that nowhere I talked about Windows Mobile (CE) neither even thought of Windows Mobile (CE) while writing that comment.
Even the example I've given is a Symbian, not Windows Mobile.
Saying that their copy of the technology worked better will hardly make your case of Apple being the "innovative" one.
hahahaha..........this is all becos of apple did not get a discounted price for their samsung chips.....so...this is what happen.....old fashion businessman.....it's an open game man......
AnonD-7981, 16 Oct 2013hah.. you are funny... apple cannot own part of arm's patent portfolio because it was never fo... moreTry searching for this article lol
'iPhone Patent Wars: Apple's $1.1 billion ARM injection ignites a mobile patent race'
Anonym, 16 Oct 2013I'm assuming you don't know much about patents, otherwise you would know that you had to fill ... morebeing able to do and being able to do flawlessly has large difference. WinMo is worst mobile OS ever. Windows was too lazy so apple came out with sensible mobile OS. Android is just copycat
AnonD-136668, 16 Oct 2013If Samsung Group (not just Electronics) had any business sense at all, they would have tied th... moreCan you be more illogical? ARM processors patents are owned by ARM and apple partially owns ARM. Qualcomm, Texas OP, Samsung etc are just contract manufacturers. If apple and ARM stops giving patent rights to samsung, then samsung is screwed unless they wanna use intel processor. Please educate yourself before commenting
Bluto, 16 Oct 2013Apple rules! Ban 'em all!+1 burn all them oversized chopsticks !
If Samsung Group (not just Electronics) had any business sense at all, they would have tied their supply contracts to Apple's patent suits. Sue us. No more supplies.
They want to have their cake and eat it too. They deserve what they get.
frh, 16 Oct 2013lol. your logic is epic...He is just exposing Apple's philosophy of doing business so that others would know how to counteract that, as a pathetic troll he is. LOL
US action "protectionism"
Apple first, customer second. Having billions in cash reserve is not enough, they want more and more and more. Apple are the world champs at emptying the pockets of its customers. No one else even comes close, and they do it without even blinking.
USA land of the greedy..
Should I say LOL ?. Funny how Americans think - Apple wins in court - Samsung devices banned, Samsung wins in court - president Obama vetoed the ban. Looks like Apple is protected by the gov in US - poor Americans shortly they will be buying only Apple products because to many bans on foreign products. Funny that they trying take a rip-off from Samsung and they don't even look how many Chinese copies infringe all aspects of Apples precious iPhone.
Bad Apple,sheltering 25 billion,
gam30toronto, 16 Oct 2013if apple "copied" all these features and even more (the idea of a mobile phone with ... moreYeah dude if that's the case that means if Samsung is as good as copying Apple as Apple is as good as copying others and making it bigger and better than Apple I don't see who would care what you or other Apple fans would think about that.
While others suing Apple had no effect I don't see why Apple suing others will have any effect.
Want to play a game of monopoly? Apple is playing. Any other brands want to join?
gam30toronto, 16 Oct 2013if apple "copied" all these features and even more (the idea of a mobile phone with ... moreI'm assuming you don't know much about patents, otherwise you would know that you had to fill a provisional application *before* launching the product in order to be able to claim anything.
At the time the *real* innovators like Nokia, SonyEricsson, Motorola and such failed to realize the true value of those novelties, allowing them to fall under "prior art" and "public domain".
Make no mistake, Apple's only innovation is how tightly it was able to market what other had done several year prior. And that is something based on actual facts which have actual dates, not a generic claim of any sort.
One could claim the 2002 SonyEricsson P800 already did everything the original iPhone (2007) trumped as innovation, being the largest difference the fact that Sony brands their music player Walkman and not "iPod".
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013Only Apple did copied all those features because all those features already existed long befor... moreIF Copying and getting away with it can make it as successful as Apple. then let it be! look at Samsung, they learn from Apple and made themselves from NOTHING to profitable!
If you say Apple succeed in Copying. Nokia, Motorla, Sony , LG, HTC etc they have to catch up in the copying because obviously they aren't copying enough! lolz