hah.. you are funny... apple cannot own part of arm's patent portfolio because it was never for sale... the same thing is saying that microsoft own's 80% of intel portfolio.... you mad?!?!? that is typical of an apple fan boy thinking that apple owns everything.
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013Because apple owns 20% of ARM processor patents. It is more harmful if apple stops licensing p... moreJust stop selling them in US of A. The whole world doesn't care about patents.
AnonD-71585, 16 Oct 2013Samsung cannot go Scotfree for coping others ideas, adding few tweets over others ideas and la... moreI doubt if you actually used a Sgs4. cos I have been using this phone since May n it just gets better by the day . perhaps you meant another phone not s4
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013May I ask you? What was your experience with smartphone before iphone? Even 2 years after firs... more60%?
That's a pretty exact number, may I ask where you got the data to support that?
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013Other things that Apple copied from the mobile phones that existed long before Apple started t... moreMay I ask you? What was your experience with smartphone before iphone? Even 2 years after first iphone, people had bad experience with smartphone. Until today, android needs two times power of iphone to reach 60% smoothness level of iphone
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013Stop selling CPU to this fruit.Because apple owns 20% of ARM processor patents. It is more harmful if apple stops licensing patents to samsung. Anyone can manufacture processor, qualcomm, texas instruments are just vendors. ARM owns all patents and apple partially own ARM.
Siri: What can I help you with ?
User: Why would apple sue samsung ?
Instead of counting their blessings, Apple is on the offensive. But I think at the end of it all, Samsung will come out the winner because, as it is said, Consumer Is King. And the king's decree supersedes rulings and bans.
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2013Stop selling CPU to this fruit.lol... selling ...
This was said in the article: The Cupertino-based company aims to reverse ITC decisions which allow Samsung to design workarounds for its products thus managing to work around the ban.
So, when Samsung actually changes this and goes another way outside of that patent, Apple is going after them again for avoiding the ban by changing those things in their phones and want to punish them even more for fixing the problem to go outside of the patent?
Do i see it right that way?
We don`t really see the need that the Americans would have access to quad core smart mobiles, when they can stick with their dual core bitten apples forever. We are proud that we are above them .
Heck has anybody heard the issues with that awful fingerprint scanner onboard the 5S...??
It just messes everything & the cherry on the cake is IOS7...logical & whatnot was being said before the debut....& now it just makes the goddamn phone so slow..& laggy....
Fruit fans what do you have to day....Apple will fail...if they continue to ride the illusionary high horse
The truth is the new iphones have a underwhelming demand as opposed to all that noise that was made before the release & Apple needs to come up with these underhand tactics so CONSUMERS get cornered...& the focus gets shifted to something more mundane.