Anonymous, 29 Dec 2013BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Jealous fanboys at it's best.
Nokia's phone is not that much stron... moreStep 1.Go back to last page of comments and see the first comment that looks like trolling....
Step 2.come back here and apologise for lying......
AnonD-197784, 29 Dec 2013Exactly! That's why we are politely saying it suits grandfather's!!Lol. Thank you. That was good.
darknite, 29 Dec 2013Please check gsmarena articles on how Samsung cheats benchmarks...u would find plenty..atleast... moreJust as I was about to say how amazing it is you did not change your name....you did.
And considering the SoC just used full potential for benchamrks...Since that exactly what the benchmark tests and everyone says that is all they are good for in the first place....It really is not cheating. And even without that it still came on top.
In that sense anything can be called a gimmick. Anything...Guaranteed if it was Nokia with these features or Iphone you would not being saying they were useless, gimmicks, or barely worked. It's because it's Samsung. However at least regardless of what haters say at least Samsung offers these options and features to their users that others do not. Luckily for their users. Many things that are made to cater to as many different people as possible. Also most of which are optional.
The Note is a lot more than just scrolling and even you know that.
And now you even try and lie. The test shows battery life yes...But nowhere does this say OS. WP has virtually no advantage except for preference.
And while the 1520 does indeed have about the best battery life, the Note 3 still has some amazing battery life, a user replaceable battery, and many extended battery options. Ranging in slim extended to that awesome flip case one GSM posted about that gives you a10,000 MAH. Which can indeed well outlast any other device...15000 could never do on Droid? Sounds like another jealous fanboy misleading fact. One of your favorite things to do seeing as how your entire post was made of that.
AnonD-134497, 28 Dec 2013Nice try though. But still, Samsung is inferior to Nokia in hardware quality. Software wise, i... moreBWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Jealous fanboys at it's best.
Nokia's phone is not that much stronger. This is not dinosaur age Nokia anymore. These are much slimmer smartphones. Yes it still has an edge, but that is from the shell and usually the glass being a little thicker. Not magic or rocket science...And please doe not take that in some illogical fanboy way and twist it into something it's not.
Yes Android has the majority of advantages.
And obviously if Samsung has modified it then yes that is Samsung not just Android....And half baked? Oh yeah I forgot you are a hurt fanboy with jealousy.
Note...Thanks to Samsung has best multi tasking on mobile, best video recording, first usb 3.0, 4k, and 3gb ram. Other's don't need it because they cannot utilize it.
The air guesters are extremely useful...Expecially whe you do not even have to touch your phone to answer calls/texts, view content of pictures, folders, writing, and so on.
Spen is also an amazing and unique feature/hardware. As well as being accompanied by the only waycom digitizer on these phones/tablets.
So there is many things the note has that no other mobile has.
Remember. You were the ones that wanted to post illogical fanboy crap and take this thread this far off topic.
Now the 1520 is no doubt an amazing device and can even slightly outdo the Note in sunlight. It's the first really high tech WP phone and about only the second time I know of Nokia being well ahead in hardware all around.
WP is pretty, but fairly limited. I just experienced some lag actually a few minutes ago. I know it's less common, but it goes to show no OS is perfect or lag free.
But Note 3 and Android come to offer some huge advancements over it.
In the end preference is preference though and a $50 price tag even if only temporary is a sweet deal.
AnonD-109004, 28 Dec 2013If u dont know, note 3. Note 3's supremacy is what i am talking about. Ripping of ppl? Its not... moreThey are just being jealous..There is no need to drop down to them though. 1520 is still a fantastic Nokia device and their cameras are top notch. Even if you do not use 20-40MP the super sampling down to extremely high res 5mp is still very useful.
AnonD-156746, 28 Dec 2013Here comes the samsung defender.....Says the one that met me while we defended Nokia to a Samsung troller together...Like I said. I defend facts and logic. The fact and logic is that in most ways Samsung is ahead and this creates a lot of jealousy.
And the comment I responded barely has anything to do with brand if you could not read....
Nor in any of it did I bash anything or deny the amazing deal going on here.
What did actually happen though is another of your usual misguided replies out of personal disdain...awaiting denial
lonesomedovepk, 29 Dec 2013Even if it get's $0, the main problem of Windows Phone that it's very old designed and old fas... moreCan you please tell which apps takes more steps for you to achieve the end functionand what did you lose because of that...pathetically...u dont own a WP device...! In simplicity it is far better than android...! I own a nexus tablet and recently brought an acer iconia windows tab...to compare fluidity and function windows 8 is far far better...if I compare with fluidity and simplicity to a WP 8 mobile OS...then too android is way too lagging...! And with Android 4.4.2...it is coming more and more closer to WP ...since no flash support .etc...
lonesomedovepk, 29 Dec 2013Even if it get's $0, the main problem of Windows Phone that it's very old designed and old fas... moreThe static icons of android is the ui which is ages old,can you say you've seen the ui with tiles stacked together showing lots of information like wp8 before??Boring looks is different thing altogether,As i've said a billion times,there are apps to make it look much better if you don't like the default simple colour tiles which actually is liked by many people......
And the point about steps to do something is not exactly precise considering you can pin almost anything to start menu for quick access......
[deleted post]It's all about Samsung, isn't it?? :-) :-) :-) :-)
AnonD-109004, 28 Dec 2013If u dont know, note 3. Note 3's supremacy is what i am talking about. Ripping of ppl? Its not... morePlease check gsmarena articles on how Samsung cheats benchmarks...u would find plenty..atleast from last 1 month... Whatever u say gimmicks r gimmicks with no use...what us the use of useless air techniques .etc... Lumia 1520 is far far better...read the review .,.again from GSMarena...a far better OS and battery life...which could be achieved only with a 150000mah battery running android OS..!
Even if it get's $0, the main problem of Windows Phone that it's very old designed and old fashioned.Just think of a person using MS-DOS command-line interface instead of Windows 7 GUI interface on a desktop computer.I was using Android for 4 years and just recently shifted to Windows Phone and it look very dull, boring and feel like a century old OS to use.Also it take several steps to reach to a certain app or hardware control....WP can appeal more only to old people not young people.
Unless the whole Windows Phone system is redesigned from scratch it can never reach head to head with Android.Even iphone stole some of the ideas as I am told by longer Android/iphone users.
Seeing Hardware Nokia is still on top of Phone manufacturer(not taking iphone in it) even after losing phone regime but in software it's Windows old-day designed Windows Phone that cannot compete the Google Android not Nokia's mistake.
If Nokia can adopt Google Android it will surely become king again.
I think the Nokia Lumia 1520 is a great value compared with its competition. I know in a few months newer and faster phones will come out but I don't think is worth spending $ 250 or more a phone. Cell phone's technology evolves just like PC's. And you can use the 1520 with PC's software which is a plus. By the time you purchase a phone worth $ 250 add insurance, a case, screen shield, and accessories you would have spent about anywhere from $150 to $ 225. That is crazy. Then after 6 months the newest thing comes out you trade your phone and won’t get anything for the case, shield, accessories and not much for the phone unless it’s a I phone or maybe Samsung.
AnonD-109004, 28 Dec 2013If u dont know, note 3. Note 3's supremacy is what i am talking about. Ripping of ppl? Its not... morehey kid be mature..... Nokia is dad ..... Time will tell 1520 much better than note 3 , samsung is just a waste of money, watch the 1520 review on you tube then comment hare...
Still not available in the shops in the UK... Nokia might do a little better if they bother shipping to other countries. Wait 3-5 months and then the latest release from another vendor will be the same price and better. The S5 will probably be available here before the 1520.
AnonD-109004, 28 Dec 2013If u dont know, note 3. Note 3's supremacy is what i am talking about. Ripping of ppl? Its not... moreNice try though. But still, Samsung is inferior to Nokia in hardware quality. Software wise, it's miles ahead and that's not Samsung, it's Android. Also the gimmicks in Note 3 are half baked and only make the phone lag. They pretty much are useless. Therefore, Samsung is not a winner over Nokia. Note 3 is not a winner over 1520. Android is the winner over 1520.