NVIDIA talks only about cores and speed; what about power efficiency and heat.
dogee, 06 Jan 2014so much lag on that demoThe lag you are talking about must be because of the slow buffering on your cheap and slow internet connection. So better keep your mouth shut.
i want in one chip everyone computer part faster and cheaper for consumers.
LCDkiller, 06 Jan 2014Tegra chips are notorious of causing phone to have blank screens for a period of times. Don't ... moreYou should take in account that LCD screens are superior to. AMOLEDs in durabilty. I think its probably becaise they are designed for power graphical imtense users rather than everyday usage.
Omdp, 06 Jan 2014Tegra 4 has lte so i pretty sure tegra 5 has lte too Anyway why does everyone like snapdrago... moreSo what? What's there to be proud of if the new core can't even beat old ones in the same power level? What does it say about A15 if it can't beat Krait?
Tegra K1 is impressive for an mobile chip , but its no where near the GPU prowess of PS4. And I hope all these performance is not at the cost of battery life.
I hope Nvidia understands these days for a mobile, battery is much more important than CPU and GPU as well already have snapdragon which is best of both worlds.
Krait is Qualcomm's version of A-15, Tegra are the ones behind.... Until now maybe.
Tegra chips are notorious of causing phone to have blank screens for a period of times. Don't know if its uses too much power and killed it self or the LCD can't handle tegra.
Tegra 4 had LTE , so TEGRA K1 definitely has LTE.
As you you can see , its performance at its highest , doubt 805 or Exynos 6 will come even close to this in terms of 3D.
Only question is battery life , nothing more.
Omdp, 06 Jan 2014Tegra 4 has lte so i pretty sure tegra 5 has lte too Anyway why does everyone like snapdrago... moreProbably because tegra chips are not very energy efficient they tend to heat up and work very heavy even in apps that require minor processor working. They are better suited for psp,nintendo or even consoles because they work at full power and deplete battery quickly. Unlike newsnapdragon chips which will use different rates of processing for different applications as they require. Tegra chips are perfect for graphical heavy applications but the problem is they are not really energy efficient like qualcomm 800 or A7. I hope they have sorted out something with this because these are damn powerful chips. Oh and probably people rely on qualcomm because its more commonly known between android and brought the trend for those people who think more cores=better
AnonD-151727, 06 Jan 2014Xiaomi Mi3 ..zte geekNot from those brands but from multi national companies like Samsung.
AnonD-90736, 06 Jan 2014Difference is qualcomm have lte, nvidia don't, qualcomm is focussed on all aspects of the phon... moreTegra 4 has lte so i pretty sure tegra 5 has lte too
Anyway why does everyone like snapdragon 805 and hates tegra 5 ?
Snapdragon 805 uses krait cores which is old architures its already on the market since 2012 and qualcomm doesnt do anyhing except bumping clock speeds while tegra 5 uses a15 cores which has more performance than krait jut take a look at note 3 1.8ghz a15 is on par with 2.3 ghz krait
It will be really surprising to see if t=it outperforms in terms of battery since that's the deal of the package for many consumers. Playing games is not the only business around now.
Difference is qualcomm have lte, nvidia don't, qualcomm is focussed on all aspects of the phone, nvidia only seems to be bothered with the gaming side, which is why their chips are always more powerful. Sorry Nvidia you've lost out again.