The math of Dr. dre dose not add up. then again my math come be off to, I'm 59y/o. So please help me understand the deal between the Dr. and Apple. I may have read it wrong. Hear what went pass my ear. The Dr. was making 1billion a year off his Beat earphones, now Apple comes and buy it for 3.5 billion. Now if Dr. would have kept it for 5 or 10 year he would have kept it for those year then he would problem have made $10billion, so why sell? Someone help my with my math.
Either apple and Beats = OVER PRICE PRODUCTS! I rather spent the same amount of money to get Hi-Fi with BOSE instead
musicalbox, 10 May 2014overbass...
mushy hummy dirty bass...for that matter, but RnB people like it ;)Agree with you, sir.
Their sound is not balanced, they favor a frequency over the other which is bad in my opinion.
I'm currently using Pioneer SE-CL07 in-ears for my JB phone, which sounds very balanced
AnonD-261466, 10 May 2014Overrated, over-advertise, overhyped product. overbass...
mushy hummy dirty bass...for that matter, but RnB people like it ;)
Apple acquiring Beats Audio: Boldy going where HTC went years before.
Apple iPhone 6: Boldly going where Samsung, HTC, Sony, Nokia, Oppo, Huawei went years before.
Innovation in motion.
AnonD-258164, 09 May 2014there only doing it so they can sue HTC and get more money because they have sued samsung for ... moreNope. You should educate yourself.
Samsung has done this before with Sharp with it's TV business. Samsung violated Sharp's patents, Sharp had sued Sammy, and then Sammy did the same damn thing it's doing to Apple. (delaying, appealing, and countersuing.)
Also, If HTC was violating Apple's patents, then Apple would have been suing HTC along with Samsung. (Or, as I call them, Scamsung)
AnonD-184766, 09 May 2014iPhone will sound better than ever..!!You know Beat is overrated right? There are at least 10 other companies make better headsets.
Next in tomorrow's tech news : "Samsung in talks with Bose about possible acquisition" LOL
Anonymous, 09 May 2014The only difference in making a smartphone better..is...adding more speakers.LG G3 has a 1 wat... moreAnalysis points to them buying it not for hardware, but more for the music streaming segment, which Beats seem to get better than others out there. Having a kind of hip edge doesnt hurt either, helping to reach a younger audience.
It's not all tangibles only, there are intangible aspects that make a business successful.
AnonD-258164, 09 May 2014there only doing it so they can sue HTC and get more money because they have sued samsung for ... moreThat makes no sense. They are not going to make back the $3.2 billion by suing other companies. They did it because they want to revive their lead in digital music. Don't fanboy out for Android and hate on Apple, look at it from a macro economics perspective, makes you look far less ignorant.
there only doing it so they can sue HTC and get more money because they have sued samsung for rediculous reasons such as there UI looking too much like ios.
The only difference in making a smartphone better..is...adding more speakers.LG G3 has a 1 watt speaker.So in other words,Apple can put 2 speakers on the Iphone.Nooo....They go out and talk to a bunch of wanna-be's instead of doing research for the best of whatever it is....Sennheiser has been around for 65 years.The Rest ? Copy cats.Wanna-be's. Apple will go down with the ship.
Hope apple ressurects n make Beats much better. In my view, BeatsAudio has a very poor sound quality. listening to music thru my sennheiser in-ear earphones is better than thru beats audio headphones. Maybe the only time i've enjoyed beats audio is thru my hp envy notebook.
Leo, 09 May 2014Steve job's deals were with top companies like Intel and Google, but now apple instead of impr... morelol- "top guys" like harmon kardon or bose?
you're someone that has been marketed to. not someone that knows quality.