Apple should lower there prices, the lower the better, more customer's will buy and that makes them the number one. That's what samsung did. They sell lower price gadgets and a lot of people buy. How about apple? is it only for those who have a lot of money? how about those common people? oh c'mon. That's why many loved samsung cause there loving the price and the phone itself.
They are behaving like little kids, "I am wearing blue, why are you", they should all shut up and just compete against each other.
Hell yeah.... long live the sammyers & let the applers kepp fooled by those pathetic fruits
another reason i will NEVER OWN A crappy iphone, the way they conduct their buisness is very poor and this crappy back and forward trying to sue any and all who make similar products or who make better products with similar technology, i also think that these patent companies also need a good shake up because personally if you build a device and submit it for production surely it should go through a patents vetting to check against the system of products to make sure it does not infringe on another companies rights, lets get this fact straight as well, samsung are not COPYING they are using technology in certain ways, but they are not looking at apple products and thinking oh we should use that in our device they are just building devices, but like all devices they should be checked properly before being released
Anonymous, 25 May 20141. Samsung's own lawyer says Samsung couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it:
... moreWhat dribble is this.
1# 64Bit processors, it's not copying at all it's a licence OWNED by ARM. Android has mostly not bothered going 64bit as the main use is the ability to use more RAM, since high density RAM is very expensive there is no point just yet to go that route. There is a Chinese company that has had a 64bit processor on the market for a couple of years now, and although Android supports 64bit it is not optimised for it in it's present form and with it having 1GB of ram at the time it was just really a marketing gimmick much like Apples.
2# Comparing Samsung's entertainment business (price fixing CRT tubes) practices to their Mobile division's is wrong they are two separate companies under the same brand both of which have separate CEO's. It's like comparing BT and BT Openreach, although under the same brand they are different companies.
Here's a few companies under the Samsung Brand, in total last a saw it was 43 companies.
Samsung Life Insurance
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance
Samsung Heavy Industries
Samsung Techwin etc.
AnonD-59657, 25 May 2014Can God sue Apple? Apple steals things from mankind!If apple is this much against samsung, then sammy should react as well. Firstly pay what amount he is asking for. Second, simply just stop supplying and manufacturing screens, rams and processors for apple for the rest of life. Let this fruit find someone else to manufacture their craps and game over. Let us live our lives for god sake apple stop this shit apple. You cant force everyone in this planet to buy only apple products.
AnonD-134497, 25 May 2014With some couple of extra efforts, you could have posted the source rather than the fake IDs. ... moreYou assume too much. I'm not the original poster. It was just pretty easy to point out how lazy you were being because you wanted to make a biased point.
Anonymous, 25 May 2014With a couple more clicks you could have found the sources. I figured out why you wouldn't. C... moreWith some couple of extra efforts, you could have posted the source rather than the fake IDs. You are the provider of a claim so you should have done the exercise, right?
rational, 25 May 2014forget about it, we are wasting our time on this issue. we must focus on the benefits that we ... moreExactly. I'm not even considering Apple or Samsung but it's funny to see them fight and then take your money somewhere else.
AnonD-134497, 25 May 2014And both of the links are representing Apple. I figured why they would say such. Have you? With a couple more clicks you could have found the sources. I figured out why you wouldn't. Can you?
Anonymous, 25 May 20141. Samsung's own lawyer says Samsung couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it: ... moreAnd both of the links are representing Apple. I figured why they would say such. Have you?
Mr R, 25 May 2014I'll say this again... Can you watch videos in HD on your phone? No? Didn't think so.Isn't that what a large screen tv is for?
[deleted post]The way things are going mate that might be your countery soon enough
Stop naked dancing mr apple. Apple is running with Samsung, s legs , , most important parts apple use are made by Samsung such as processor, nand flash memory , display on ipad etc. First stop this and go for cort . We know how much cost iphone actually. It is so cheap phone selling expensive price if you don't believe Google it.
Anonymous, 25 May 20141. Samsung's own lawyer says Samsung couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it: ... moreI'll say this again... Can you watch videos in HD on your phone? No? Didn't think so.
If apple rules the mobile industry with their expensive price, what about common people who also want a smartphone?
MdN8, 25 May 2014Not always. USA is full of companies who patent anything that isn't patented already, just so ... moreThen you must be outraged at companies like that lure everyone into adopting their patents as SEPs and then turns around and sues companies with those same patents. Nah, who am I kidding. You're just a fanboys who can't process things when it gets even a little complicated.