I think anyone who buy this phone more then 50 euro shpuld be punished with death sentence. 3 mpix camera horible
virus, 08 Apr 2009Noob !anyone who says 'noob' lives with his mum has no friends and suffers inferiority complexes
I dont think that Samsung will launch now a phone like this. It doesnt seem good. Samsung stopped to launch phone with desing like this two years ago. If you want a real Samsung mid-range phone look at S series touchscreen phones.
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2009low/mid/high range is based on handset cost, not necessarily spec and capability (although the... moreand the cost of a 5mp should be near to nothing by now,being surrounded and overtaken in numbers of models by 8 and soon 12,the woah factor in 5s is dead,and its cost price is very low now,believe me.
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2009low/mid/high range is based on handset cost, not necessarily spec and capability (although the... moredon't tell me about materials,of course a low specs,midrange one made of titanium,platinum and covered in diamonds will be more expensive than a 24 mg,5.1 surrond sound,15 optical zommed smart phone made of plastic,it's all marketing,but as a car used to be a luxury item in the 50's,it's far from being that nowadays.and i'm telling you that midranging phones keep the ones that should be midrange like the 5800 nokia high range and high priced.they're fooling us,na
coolworld, 08 Apr 2009mid range ? a two or 3 mp camera phone with a small display of less than 2.4 inch is not mid r... morelow/mid/high range is based on handset cost, not necessarily spec and capability (although the 2 are directly related). Theres a much bigger difference in cost between 2/3mp and 5mp than there is between 5 and 8
mid range ? a two or 3 mp camera phone with a small display of less than 2.4 inch is not mid range,this is back to the stone age. 5 mp camera phones at the moment could be called mid range as there's already too many 8mp around to be noticed anymore,especially now that we're waiting for the sonyE that sports a 12 mp camera. it's just to fool us into thinking that they are mid range so that they can keep at overcharging us the better true mid range.by the way,the nokia 5800 still hasn't reached the promised price of 240 euros but is still around 400,on the net,in shops is more. all thieves i tell you
WT, 07 Apr 2009in South Africa we are suckers for slide phones. And Samsung is a very strong brand here.have you forgotten that samsung makes the worst slider flex on earth?
Dungu, 08 Apr 2009I like samsung becoz my girlfren like samsung.that's nice dungu
Less Samsung, more news of other brands.
I'm sick of hearing of LG, Samsung and Nokia all the time... I don't care about their mid-range crap.
Give us some of the good stuff.
How bout Iphone 3G is only , 2MP camera, but it consider a
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2009Gosh, the writer of this article couldn't master better English.couldn't agree more... the 'writer' of this article needs to be fired or perhaps caned for actually posting such insults to grammar and the english language... and then of course the 'editor' who let it through. i'd be glad to offer my services to do a better job, as would any chimp with a pencil... poor form gsm
This phone is just a shame for Samsung. Regular basic phone has 15,4 mm thickness. Also think about 2.1 ' screen... USB and bluetooth mentioned as super advanced features...
Again, such phone would be the shame for any manufacturer.
Making thick phones Samsung tries to avoid creating any competitor for it's so called ultra slim series. But for those who don't like new ultra slim series ( this yeas models are really poor ) there is no other choice among other Samsung models: buy Ultra if you want slim phone or you will get something obsolete ang ugly if you don't want Ultra. Sorry Samsung, but I will look for slim but still advanced phone from some other company.