Nix, 26 Jun 2014Both watch are ugly and battery so low only lasts for 4hr samsung live 2 hr lol piece of junk ... moreAre you a hater? Wow. This devices haven't even entered the market? So how on earth are you able to know how good/bad it is. Stop making poor judgments or just troll somewhere else.
If they can't make batteries last longer, it's not the time to release such devices. Companies should invest big amounts of money on batteries research, the first to get that kind of patent, will get lots and lots of money.
Both watch are ugly and battery so low only lasts for 4hr samsung live 2 hr lol piece of junk unuseful for a traveller
its not as good as the Gear 1, as that has a camera. stick my gear.
Hey, they're now available on Play India too. G watch is priced a Rs. 1000 less than gear live in India, with G watch at Rs. 14999, dispatching warehouse by 8th july and Gear Live priced at Rs. 15900,with a coming soon status.
i india gear live costly than the lg gwatch lg watch cost u $249.32 but gearlive for $265.94
LG Made android wear samsung also made it :D what a coincidence
am seeing the G watch cheaper than the Samsun live in the UK play store £10 difference between them
It's also available in UK and Australian play stores.
In Australia, both models are the same price ($249). I have ordered the G Watch because it's lower resolution and longer battery life appeal to me.
In the UK, the G Watch is 159 pounds and the Samsung Gear Live is 169 pounds.
Which watch is cheaper depends on where you live! Both are available to order in the play store of 12 countries from today.