A friend of mine is using this phone- Nokia 105(2015) and he told me that it is an extremely good phone with nice loudspeaker.
Terrible for a real phone!!!!
Sucks that it doesn't have a camera...
ZH, 29 Jul 2016I'm using it as a back up phone. One thing I can say that it's call quality is very good and l... moredoes this phone have front speaker?or just single speaker which works for both call and loudspeaker??
K CHAN, 14 Aug 2016i have brought dual sim 105 black colour, nice phone and light weight
Nice little phone,very lightweight and good.
The blue one is the best looking but the black is also okay.
i have brought dual sim 105 black colour, nice phone and light weight
I'm using it as a back up phone. One thing I can say that it's call quality is very good and loud, no leakage of sound from the back. And the rest u all know
The ultimate Anti-Smartphone!
Bhushan, 02 Jun 2016Excellent feature phone. Value for money. Good brand. Only problem is single sim.go for its dual sim then
Excellent feature phone. Value for money. Good brand. Only problem is single sim.
Great phone, light and easy to use.
Have bought 2 of these from ebay, each time assured they do predictive text in english. First one had only 3 manuals in 3 european languages and no english predictive text. second one, box had been opened to put a photocopy of the english manual, but still a foreign phone with no predictive text in english. Anyone know where to get english version without paying more than about 20 GBP please post here.
Can it do whatsapp?
A pretty nice phone it is but there are still so many nice features microsoft removed e.g the stopwatch a very useful. Another is the battery mine does not last I don't knw if it cos I dint charge to full b4 I started using it,but anyway it still a nice phone kudos 2 microsoft.
good basic phone with 2-3 days battery life!
Anonymous, 06 Jan 201685 SAR85? What do you mean?
Btw, as far as I kno, its SAR is 0.74
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2015I was looking for something to replace my 9-year-old Nokia 1600, which I was very fond of, but... moreI completely agree with all of this user's comments. I am an eager fan of the NOKIA 105, 2013, and expected the NOKIA 105, 2015 to be even better, in terms of battery performance and everything else. I must state categorically that I'm disappointed with the NOKIA 105, 2015, after owning it only for 10 days. For starters, the battery standby time is significantly less than for the 2013 version (and I have two of those, have had then for two to three months).
Secondly, it's impossible to set it to Power Save Mode as is the case with the 2013 model.
I should also agree with this user with respect to everything else he/she has referred to.
Yes, indeed it does appear as if Microsoft Mobile aren't serious about continuing with Nokia's excellent quality for basic phones at low prices!Hope this gets solved fast!
Anonymous, 24 Dec 2015I was looking for something to replace my 9-year-old Nokia 1600, which I was very fond of, but... moreWow ! Great review with all the necessary informations. Keep up the good work. I am eagerly waiting for the next review . Cheers !
Anonymous, 30 Dec 2015What is the SAR value for this phone? Couldn't find it anywhere online. Users kindly reply. Th... more85 SAR
What is the SAR value for this phone? Couldn't find it anywhere online. Users kindly reply. Thank you.
Small phone but big value for money...
Tip us
2.0m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up