Nokia 1600 - user opinions and reviews

• Thanakorn
• PZI
• 07 Jun 2005

This is a basic Phone From Nokia.
It OK for basic use.
I Like It

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• simon
• 42R
• 06 Jun 2005

it could be triband phone and with video camera phone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Faisel Shah
• MMy
• 06 Jun 2005

This fone is useless! No GPRS, so why has it got 4MB when you can't download anything from wap!!!?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Aatif
• PF2
• 06 Jun 2005

I just want to ask whats the meaning of mp3-grade sound? is it real mp3 or ...how can I transfer tones to this fone from my PC.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Karim
• mXP
• 04 Jun 2005

I think the features of the 3100, combined with the design of this phone, and the camera of 3200, would make the ultimate nokia.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sasank
• ijY
• 04 Jun 2005

simply old 2100 in new color ie too only smalles screen.simply basic phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Lethal
• mTv
• 04 Jun 2005

Ya, good phone, though I'm not such a Nokia fan...can anyone tell me what's the difference between the Stn and Cstn display, or is it the same thing?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• shinoy
• iji
• 04 Jun 2005

good.but cud do better with GPRS

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mazaher
• MuN
• 04 Jun 2005

i agree with andy
This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players n all tht stuff.
i got 2600 n i will upgrade to 1600
thnx again nokia

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• msB
• 04 Jun 2005

ok but the screen is so small!
the 3100 is so better!
the 1600 design is top!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Felipe Cepriano
• Pjb
• 03 Jun 2005

It's dissaponting yes... MP3 Tones, 4 MB memory, NO GPRS?
TFT 96x68 Screen? A CSTN 128x128 will be better!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• andy
• jMp
• 03 Jun 2005

Thank you Nokia for making phones for everyone, not just the super rich. This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players, etc.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• R5g
• 03 Jun 2005

Honestly, how can you say that something is disappointing when you haven't even used the thing...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DoD
• RKn
• 03 Jun 2005

Its not dissapointing,this phone is for people who cant really afford phone like 6680,6681 etc.All phones Are supposed to have different uses

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• FSR
• nbq
• 03 Jun 2005

Another disapointing product from nokia !!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DoD
• RKn
• 03 Jun 2005

what do they mean by MP3 grade?well,if it has mp3 I might buy this phone,Any way cool design..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Ghazani
• PIb
• 03 Jun 2005

this fone loooking nice but i m afraid about nokia i can,t uner stand why nokia made thissssss look lik 2600 any body can tell me about its prise i prefer nec 606

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• yee
• mY6
• 02 Jun 2005

nothing more, than a 2100

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ????
• Svf
• 02 Jun 2005

there vill be stoped to produce old phones thts why nokia makes new phones. everyone makes something new becouse it vould replace old thing. (sorry for bad english)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Paul
• RKe
• 02 Jun 2005

I don't know why Nokia makes these handsets. The prices would be cheap as its a basic phone but there are a lot of good handsets out in the market the prices if compared will be similar to these sets eg Nokia 3120(it doesn't have mp3 still its a very good phone)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report