Nokia 1600 - user opinions and reviews

• Aatif
• PF2N
• 06 Jun 2005

I just want to ask whats the meaning of mp3-grade sound? is it real mp3 or ...how can I transfer tones to this fone from my PC.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Karim
• mXPP
• 04 Jun 2005

I think the features of the 3100, combined with the design of this phone, and the camera of 3200, would make the ultimate nokia.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sasank
• ijY8
• 04 Jun 2005

simply old 2100 in new color ie too only smalles screen.simply basic phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Lethal
• mTvF
• 04 Jun 2005

Ya, good phone, though I'm not such a Nokia fan...can anyone tell me what's the difference between the Stn and Cstn display, or is it the same thing?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• shinoy
• ijit
• 04 Jun 2005

good.but cud do better with GPRS

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mazaher
• MuNk
• 04 Jun 2005

i agree with andy
This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players n all tht stuff.
i got 2600 n i will upgrade to 1600
thnx again nokia

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• msBj
• 04 Jun 2005

ok but the screen is so small!
the 3100 is so better!
the 1600 design is top!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Felipe Cepriano
• PjbQ
• 03 Jun 2005

It's dissaponting yes... MP3 Tones, 4 MB memory, NO GPRS?
TFT 96x68 Screen? A CSTN 128x128 will be better!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• andy
• jMpj
• 03 Jun 2005

Thank you Nokia for making phones for everyone, not just the super rich. This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players, etc.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• R5gp
• 03 Jun 2005

Honestly, how can you say that something is disappointing when you haven't even used the thing...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DoD
• RKn2
• 03 Jun 2005

Its not dissapointing,this phone is for people who cant really afford phone like 6680,6681 etc.All phones Are supposed to have different uses

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• FSR
• nbqg
• 03 Jun 2005

Another disapointing product from nokia !!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DoD
• RKnc
• 03 Jun 2005

what do they mean by MP3 grade?well,if it has mp3 I might buy this phone,Any way cool design..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Ghazani
• PIbB
• 03 Jun 2005

this fone loooking nice but i m afraid about nokia i can,t uner stand why nokia made thissssss look lik 2600 any body can tell me about its prise i prefer nec 606

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• yee
• mY6B
• 02 Jun 2005

nothing more, than a 2100

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ????
• Svfk
• 02 Jun 2005

there vill be stoped to produce old phones thts why nokia makes new phones. everyone makes something new becouse it vould replace old thing. (sorry for bad english)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Paul
• RKeE
• 02 Jun 2005

I don't know why Nokia makes these handsets. The prices would be cheap as its a basic phone but there are a lot of good handsets out in the market the prices if compared will be similar to these sets eg Nokia 3120(it doesn't have mp3 still its a very good phone)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• JK2
• ntW}
• 02 Jun 2005

It's for African market

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• YASA
• my{b
• 02 Jun 2005

WHY NOT just upgradw the scren and add mp3 to 3108 and 661oi and 6220

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Yaserk99
• my{b
• 02 Jun 2005

what are they problems - wots with the 96x60 screen when the 128x128 i was hoping would be replaced by 208x208/ how wrong were i. why make all these plain phones when the nokia 7210 - the best phone of its era made 3-4 years ago - much better than these is nowhere to b seen in major retailers

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report