Nokia 1600 - user opinions and reviews

• vodajohn
• iEP
• 04 Jul 2005

if u ask me nokia is not aiming this fone on gprs users some1 :)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• F4p
• 23 Jun 2005

its look like 3100....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Diego Kurisaki
• Pfx
• 20 Jun 2005

Looks great to me, nice design, 65k screen (wow!) and problably will be cheap, thats the magic word CHEAP and yet is a nokia phone problably will be really well made.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• some1
• M%8
• 10 Jun 2005

at first i thought this phone looked good , but then i saw it has no gprs ,so if ur looking for a low end good fone,this is not it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ViPsHiPs
• PYe
• 07 Jun 2005

I think MP3-grade ringtones sound like a MP3 music, but they aren't MP3. It's not common to have a low-end Nokia with high-quality polyphonic ringtones (20-poly in 1110 and in 1600), so they called MP3 to say that these ringtones are better than the older ones, like those in 2300 and in 3510 (4-poly? disgusting!).

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• jon
• mqK
• 07 Jun 2005

in answer to the above post, you dont need GPRS to download stuff. just use csd. dial up for the unknowing!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Thanakorn
• PZI
• 07 Jun 2005

This is a basic Phone From Nokia.
It OK for basic use.
I Like It

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• simon
• 42R
• 06 Jun 2005

it could be triband phone and with video camera phone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Faisel Shah
• MMy
• 06 Jun 2005

This fone is useless! No GPRS, so why has it got 4MB when you can't download anything from wap!!!?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Aatif
• PF2
• 06 Jun 2005

I just want to ask whats the meaning of mp3-grade sound? is it real mp3 or ...how can I transfer tones to this fone from my PC.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Karim
• mXP
• 04 Jun 2005

I think the features of the 3100, combined with the design of this phone, and the camera of 3200, would make the ultimate nokia.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sasank
• ijY
• 04 Jun 2005

simply old 2100 in new color ie too only smalles screen.simply basic phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Lethal
• mTv
• 04 Jun 2005

Ya, good phone, though I'm not such a Nokia fan...can anyone tell me what's the difference between the Stn and Cstn display, or is it the same thing?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• shinoy
• iji
• 04 Jun 2005

good.but cud do better with GPRS

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mazaher
• MuN
• 04 Jun 2005

i agree with andy
This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players n all tht stuff.
i got 2600 n i will upgrade to 1600
thnx again nokia

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• msB
• 04 Jun 2005

ok but the screen is so small!
the 3100 is so better!
the 1600 design is top!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Felipe Cepriano
• Pjb
• 03 Jun 2005

It's dissaponting yes... MP3 Tones, 4 MB memory, NO GPRS?
TFT 96x68 Screen? A CSTN 128x128 will be better!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• andy
• jMp
• 03 Jun 2005

Thank you Nokia for making phones for everyone, not just the super rich. This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players, etc.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• R5g
• 03 Jun 2005

Honestly, how can you say that something is disappointing when you haven't even used the thing...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• DoD
• RKn
• 03 Jun 2005

Its not dissapointing,this phone is for people who cant really afford phone like 6680,6681 etc.All phones Are supposed to have different uses

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report