well..the diffrent between the two,1661 and 1800,as what i see,is that the keypad at the frist one is almost the same with 1800,but 1800 is much more softer touch,which i think its even better!
and plus it looks really good for a phone at this price range!
and it does soundes better than the 1661,atleast for now!
Aside from the front/back covers what's the difference between the 1800 and the 1616?
is the keypad rubber (like 1200-sort of) or hard plastic? if rubber, after somtime the keypad feedback is disastrous and annoyingly uncomfortable, unlike as it used to be like the moment of first time usage
i just got this 1800 last night,and so far so good!
i bought it after my 1661 had to be put for rest after 2 years in service,which is pretty good for a phone at that price range(dirt cheap).
in this 1800,seemes like its doing all what it should do,as a very basic cell,and a bit more.
i will post more comments,once i have for some more times for un update!
wml, 04 May 2010nokia 1661 or 1800 is better? or Samsung E2120? Want a simple phone with large font so I won't... more2120 is better phone beacause same rang you got fully multimedia with long battary life
hope nokia 1800 will fulfill all d needs of all those who needs comfortability, clearity of voice, classic looks, affordable price. a common man can also experience d cellphone of economical range in branded co's range, instead of going for a too high range cellphone.
wish u good luck to get success in this competitive market.
nokia 1661 or 1800 is better? or Samsung E2120? Want a simple phone with large font so I won't need reading glasses
it may be having the same problem of network fluctuation like 1602 and 1601 is having.. it is a waste cell. better to go samsung in this range.
its great phone for those who beleive that cell phone major purpose to build contacts.in such user friendly price.
good phone...but i think it's speakar is slow.& keypad is not perfect for aged persons.