TFT 64k is downgrade from 225 with 256K screen. now dual cam but screen bad. weh..
make a new one, like Nokia 240, and make it like Nokia c5-00.2/C5 5MP.
so we end up with sweet specs of C5 but with bigger screen (2.8" TFT 16m). since this is only backup phone, no need for wifi, 3g/4g. 2g is fine and bluetooth. bigger memory for texts.
AND then, maybe make another one, like Nokia 245. just like 240 but with 3g/4g, wifi, bigger and better camera front and back and battery.
I don't mind plastic.
nokia must remember there is aging population who don't want touch anymore. just simple text, type, picture/video and email.
Only 16 mb internal memory? Not good enough. Why not make it 256 mb. Ofcourse it can be expanded with sd card but asfar as I know, sms(messages) will only be save on phone memory and cant be transfered on sd card.
I formerly trust nokia brand but as of now..I'll gonna switch to IOS.
Lollo, 25 Nov 2015Awkward, back to the 1999...it is not that weak. it is a premium made selfie centric phone for poor people and those who want a nice secondary phone. they don't want cheap androids since they want a phone that last 5+ years on rough usage. because money is hard earned and this phone has an advantage of battery backup of 22 days.
This is actually not bad, the front facing camera has flash. Would be a great phone to take on trips we're unsure of safety. Wouldn't mind losing a cheap phone that can take decent photos and connect to wifi with a temporary sim to keep in contact when outstation.
It's a B A S I C P H O N E humans!!
not a Smartphone..
This one is beautiful! Nokia!
the only improvement here is the front camera. everything else went backwards. honestly, what the *bleep* *bleep* where you thinking nokia?!
Are they Serious with 2G for their latest Feature Phone??????????????? Recommended only for senior citizens hahaha
Hiii. First one to comment. Looks nice but functions would be basic.
i like e52 nokia.i dont like this phone...because 3g or wifi no.no improve ram.ok