Hey Rami and kareeun,
I truly agree with both of you. For me, to choose a phone, I will go for the function. SE and even Samsung cannot compete with nokia (for the function). I really dun know why SE is soooo famous. If u ask me, I don't even keep track with the latest models as to I'm actually not so interested in it.
Please don't consider my advise in an offensive manner. It's just my opinion. That's what it is :)
Well, Nokia had a music phone first... Do not forget Nokia 5510 which had MP3 playback and FM radio. Already in 2001!!!
What about 3250... Time will show but it's quite innovative and the design is fresh. :)
btw.. nokia is trying to get sony ericsson's market now.. they copy the sony ericsson's idea of making the music phone (as usual, added with more feature) ^__^ what a lame... not creative at all.. plagiarism, too bad for nokia.
Nokia's done it again. Great style, superb features but looks too much like 3230. QCIF video is a minus and twist feature totally pointless. Likely to be a big seller nevertheless
i m currently using nokia 7710 but hoping t buy this baby as soon as posible it simply rocks
stop comparing it with w800 this phone supports more formats, its funnier and a smartphone what does it means? that you can install programs int it! there are freeware or shareware alot of it to it and they are not expensive neither, that why it beats
SE really made ppl soo stupid and cant even use their heads !!!!!!!
what the hell is W800 !! its just a TOY !
YES ....JUST A STUPID TOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
camera and walkman ..... fine ... but what does it do as a mobile phone !!!
limited space for names and msgs !!!!! oh dear god !!! WAKE UP STUPID SE.
no EDGE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOWWWWWW
small screen and all i can say .... if this is not stupid ... then what is ?????
no smart os .... no 3G .... NOTHING but a camera and walkman !!!!!
*even in the camera wise ....... it records qcif video with 15 frams per sec. ( no flash or cover lens .... ooooooooooooo thats a big score for the toy .. isnt it empty heads )
*creative design not a disgusting toy like the w800 .... at least it can be used by ppl over 9 years old !!!
so SE fans ......... plz stay in ur useless company forums and stay out of here.....
cuz u really dont know anything about technology
sony ericsson ha smuch powerful camera than n90 then think of the comparison between w800i and 3250.the thing about 3g there is not 3g service presence in city where i live so no need of 3g function.w800i rocks . nath1z blowz do you compared them both in hands in 1 week and if you did you didnot compared them both properly.i compared them both thats why iam saying w800i is much better than 3250.i strees to buy w800i.nath1n blowz you only three differences between 3250 and w800i.stop it.if you donot know anything so stop saying anything bad about w800i.
nath1n blowz there is camera protection in w800i flash can play music minimal 20 hours its not what you saying twisting is not a major technology and other things that you were saying.w800i has not edege and big screen thats all.if you want to say about picture it doesnot matter on screen size and w800i has better camera than 3250 though n90.(you can learn small overview about 3250 and comparison between n90)it will tell you whats better.
Nice looking unit. Still waiting for it to land out here in South Africa. The specs look good but, what happened to the days when a phone was a phone? If I want to take pictures I've got two dedicated cameras at my disposal to to take decent pics with (my line of business is dependant on high quality pictures). I DJ on weekends as well, why do I need to listen to music on my phone. It's a communication tool innit? Or do we all want to look like those IPOD wearing widgets who cut themselves off from the world? Great way to communicate that!
hi everyone .....
actually .... i dont know why all of u attacking this phone and compare it to the W800 ???
i think and i think u agree with me that both of them can be compared only on the music side .... and not as phones ..... cuz as phones i think the 3250 wins ...... the EDGE ... the screen is bigger ..... the smart OS ... the design !!!
music side ..... its not out so i cant say if its that good or not ...... but basicly ... i think it really wins .... why ? cuz it can play all kind of multimedia files .... right ??????
another thing ... for who say lets compare them and we will see W800 is better..... ok... i have time.... tell me .. why W800 is better ? .... dont just say w800 will win and run away....
and now about putting all the technologies together in one phone !!!!
C'MON guys .... u cant be that stupid !!!!! this is exactly like the 3230 ... a cheap version of the 6630 ( 1.3 camera plus symbian without the 3G ) .... and this one is a cheap version of N91 without the wi-fi , hard drive ............. its a 3XXX series for the love of god.... how can u expect it to be loaded !!!!
and this comes out of the SE fans !!!
tell me SE fans .... i want 1 device from SE that compines 3 different tech. together ...
3g - powerfull camera - big screen - smart os
where is it ?????
pxxx :- smart os and thats it .. no camera no 3g
sxxx :- camera and screen ... no 3g no smart os
k750 \ w800 :- NOTHING but a camera and music player ..... where is the big high end screen ? where is the 3g ... the EDGE .. the smart OS..... where is ANYTHING beside the camera and walkman !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so plz .. SE fans .... dont talk about technology .... ok ???? cuz u know nothing about it :)
hemmm.....now i really confused...before they intoduced 3250, ive planning to buy N70, but....after saw the 3250 in ur situs..i chanche my plan...cause in my country Indonesia...3G tech isnt ready to operate now, maybe until end of 2006, so...if i buy 3G N70...its so waste my money, 3250 model is awesome, looks nice, and my next quetion, after 3250,is any other models can make me confuse to buy, cause nokia producer is to fast to launch a new models......
Now Nokia is creating a "match" with SE W800. Though the features are excellent, the model is just an imitation of W800's brilliant features as well as its accesories. I should not say that the phone is not good but Nokia has definitely lost its originality here. If you have time, try to compare both phones' features and you'll see. -chao
As you are a Nokia fan you should know the wicked strategy performed by Nokia.
While all the other brands put in their new phones all the technologies of the moment, Nokia, making of trustability and fame its own strenght, releases phones which include only some technologies. They know people would buy them, even overpriced, as they R Nokia.
Maybe, observing Nseries models, the strategy is slowly changing.
It seems, now, Nokia understood that people looking for all-in-one hi-tech phones couldn't find the handset they were searching among Nokia ones.
Notice the innovation. For the first time Nokia is the first to use technologies like integrated microdrive, zeiss optics, CIF video, 352x416pxls display on mobiles.
However those are not integrated in each model, but split in different handsets.
Another minus is that Nseries models are really expesive if compared to samsung, lg, motorola, SE, and all the other brands...but that's the price of exclusivity.
Don't forget also that 32xx is a cheap series. If 32xx had 16Mcolour display Nokia would have named it 66xx with 50% higher price.
why 256k display if panasonic can produce 16million colors? if nokia is no.1 it should be in all aspects not just for market sake! anyways im a nokia fun but i have to comment on its display very far from samsung, sharp and panasonic.
Love this phone, nice design. Finally Nokia gets their act together, good/innovative design, good specs and reasonable price, this will be a blast for sure. But a little thick. Best looking Nokia phone for the past 3 years