[deleted post]too ugly and too dumb. features should be beyond nokia 301 (and nokia pc suite compatible).
[deleted post]I agree with you. it is ugly because is not close enough to the original.
My fathers current phone the Nokia Asha 300 has 5MP camera,1GHz single-core CPU,touchscreen and more ram & rom,all the rest are about the same!
But of course it was more expensive and it's wasn't supposed to be a simple feature phone.
Anyway my father had this phone for a while now and it's almost broken so he is gonna buy this fore sure as he is a Nokia addict!
The only thing left unknown,is it also indestructible? :-P
That was a not a phone, but a part of our life. A legacy when we can call and message people on the go. I used one for at least 3 years. Honestly I want to own it again not as a device but a memory of life.
Does it have java midp support? If not, where to get the symbian apps? Any appstore nokia is launching for the same?
If they really wanted it to be a successful phone - the de facto choice on the feature phone market - they should have stayed with only a slightly updated design, but now waterproof, a classic monochrome display for a retro vibe, no camera for the security-conscious and most importantly a longer lasting battery of ~1000+ hours, although this one is quite nice as well.
Dissapointed. They should have introduced the original classy one. This looks unappealing.
Will it have Whatsapp ? I know a few Nokia feature phones in the past had Whatsapp support.