i can accept without 3G and GPS but without 3.5mm jack is not good.
3.5mm port, definitely not good, there are lot better phones in the market altough this seems to be good.
Can any one tell it's price in India and when it's going to be launched????.....pls reply to mnm27mnmpth@gmal,com
Why? Why! Why?!!!! Stop with the 2.5mm audio jacks Nokia. I have using adapters and already have very good 3.5mm headphones. So I'm not going to use the crappy 2.5 mm headphones in the box.
C702 isn't a complete rugged phone. Try putting that thing under water or hitting it with a golf club and see if it'll endure all that stuff. If you're going to have a rugged, no nonsense phone, then I think you can do without 3g.
no 3g,no wlan,no secondary camera & no etc....etc.....one proof that nokia is going backward...see the latest models of se,samsung,lg,iphone...
for a rugged phone... is a very nice.. this phone is a travel, for camping... I will buy it as soon gets available...and i will use it as my back up phone
GT3, 10 Jul 2009compete with SE C702 but C702 is far more better than this nokia. no GPS..3.5G..etc that C702 had. If you compare with SE C702, compare service cases also. 1 out of 2 have trouble with their phone.
Anonymous, 10 Jul 2009kinda like it. Too bad it has no secondary camera, not a quadband, and no GPS.Secondary Camera? What 3G
compete with SE C702 but C702 is far more better than this nokia. no GPS..3.5G..etc that C702 had.