is this phone better then the NOkia 5610 Xpress music? REPLY ME PLZ!!! )=
regedit, 31 Jul 2008why this phone got low rating? 256k colors/low battery life(just like 5310) better grab SE W30... morehay 5220&5310 is having same resolution 16m but the pixels r different buddy mind it
5220 may have only 262k lcd but the style is unique..unlike the 6300 where it has already pirated version..6300 sucks
regedit, 31 Jul 2008why this phone got low rating? 256k colors/low battery life(just like 5310) better grab SE W30... moreIf you really like SE for that mega bass thing i think is a marketing gimmick. Bass does not mean a sound quality at all...
After i tried to plug my 5700 to an amplifier, i've only uses the equalizer of the phone and tweak it to the best set. all i can say is wow... you will hear that the sound do not blend...
Vij, 30 Jul 2008I wonder too why it has low ratings. It has a lot of features I could say. Design could be dec... moreThat's true but unfortunately there are people that can never get satisfyed with features even when they don't have enough money to buy a N82 but want the best for the lowest price.
I'm pretty sure this phone is better in all aspects compared to W350, but W350 has higher ratings due to some brand fans, not because the phone is supreme. This phone has lower rating because other brand fans.
regedit, 31 Jul 2008why this phone got low rating? 256k colors/low battery life(just like 5310) better grab SE W30... moreLet me tell you that the W302 don't have MegaBass (even if it's supposed to be a W phone), read the preview on this site, to see for yourself. I think this phone is better because the screen, the sound chip and music controls
if you think nokia 6300"s desplay has a good screen you better see it first!
regedit, 31 Jul 2008why this phone got low rating? 256k colors/low battery life(just like 5310) better grab SE W30... moreThe 5220 does not have a low battery life. The phone has a 1020 battery. This will run properly on a phone that does not have an OS. I expect this phone to go for 6 days on a single charge (if moderately used).
Secondly, this phone has a 262k display. This will have less of an effect on the battery life of the phone.
Finally, the phone can play for 24 hours under one charge. I dont think this translates to a bad battery life.
screen quality is pathetic. for the same price one can buy 6300 with 16 million colour screen.
why this phone got low rating? 256k colors/low battery life(just like 5310) better grab SE W302 same features but mega-bass owns!
I wonder too why it has low ratings. It has a lot of features I could say. Design could be decent and it says that it could stay up 24 hours music listening (on a full charge).
I'm planning to buy this phone in the coming days so why it has very low rating? Compared to Sony Ericsson w350i, it has better features and performance I guess..
ME, 27 Jul 2008Hey.. I got this phone a few days ago.. N i have to say.. I LOVE IT.. I jz love it's design so... moreI definitely agree with you, You need to watch the phone live first to talk about the design because some pictures seen on the PC could give you a different and wrong idea. Personally I like the design because is unique, but I wouldn't buy it because I upgraded to S60 and I love my 5700. Anyway I think this phone is great as a music portable device.
Hey.. I got this phone a few days ago.. N i have to say.. I LOVE IT.. I jz love it's design so much.. Even the menu has pretty effects.. The music is good. Although im gonna get my own headphones,cz the supplied ones are a bit crap.. The camera is better than i thought.. Battery life seems ok,but not as good as ppl say it should be.. Not sure why this is..
One niggle i have with it is that sometimes it restarts by itself.. The restart is really quick tho.. N i read that it happened with the 5610 too.. Hopefully theyll be a software update 4 it soon..
Overall,i think this phone is worth it.. I looks MUCH better in real life than it does in pics,n EVERYONE iv asked at least likes it,if not love..
So,ppl,if u like its stylish design,it's totally worth getting.. Dont listen to the boring,conventional ppl who say it's ugly..
They jz have different tastes(Boring tastes)..
its very unique design,suitable for person who want something different..n less chosen by other people.
Those who use Nokia phones make the right choice. While i am aware that other phone companies are offering crucial features like touch screen, i realize Nokia staff know what they are doing and they are focus on price/features balance. it's the reason why Nokia offers wide features for cheap price. At the moment i'm writing this message, the company is working on options to launch nokia phones that use solar power. I agre that most of nokia phones lack delicacy comparing to SE, Samsung and Motorola design. I have been using Nokia phones for 7 years and i really like the way nokia arranges features. All nokia menus are user friendly. I am a music lover. I used Nokia 5300, 5310, 5610 and i am about to buy the 5220 because i prefer using S40 series as it is more simple.
If you are a Nokia you did the right choice. But it's obvious the other companies give good choices too. you are free to decide, but if you are someone who cares about battery life, simple menu, fast download, Nokia is your phone.
i like the shape of this phone...
but this is quite disappointing..
because it has no flash....
but it's ok..
i love its 3.5 mm audio jack...
Just don't judge the phone by only seeing it on pictures...
i suggest hold it personally then post your comments here...
who the hell company make a look such thing horrible when it is non sense...