shadow, 28 Aug 2009i have my 5800 for 6months now and i'm satisfied with it. This phone got all you need wi-fi,lo... moreOnly for wi-fi is a main spec that 5230 doesnt have and 5800 does have. but paying like 60% more for a 5800? I dont think so, unless you really really need it.
better late then never.. now this is the phone to compete with samsung star and LG cookie.. but still no flash and camera is only 2MP.. come on nokia atleast flash is supossed to be included
this is a good phone with affordable price and 2 mega pixel wit good resulotion
Wants to see through the review up on very soon!Guess i like this touch phone!!
i have my 5800 for 6months now and i'm satisfied with it. This phone got all you need wi-fi,long lasting battery,gps,etc...i recommend this phone rather than this one.
Razlan, 27 Aug 2009it's really a responsive touch screen and has a good screen resolution.It has accelerometter f... moredoes it has kinetic scrolling and what can you say about the display under sunlight
to all guys.man this is vey great fone from nokia.we know there is only 2 mp camera.that is good 4 office work watching videos etc.i m requesting 2 young generation that it is not 4 u.this is office machine guys.this is 4 those whos want tch scren and larg scren.bye.think again........
Anonymous, 27 Aug 2009Razlan nokia 5230 is great mobile ? how its its screen ? & touch panal it's really a responsive touch screen and has a good screen resolution.It has accelerometter for auto-rotate and as you can see on the phone spec it also has handwritting recognition and that works pretty well.It's a great phone really
Razlan nokia 5230 is great mobile ? how its its screen ? & touch panal
This is one of the many phones that i've unboxed.And it's great for what it was ment to do.This phone is build as a affordable touchscreen phone but without the luxury of wi-fi or other kind of simylar staff.It's a cheap phone, don't like to call it a budget phone because it's not.In terms of looks it's really simylar to the Nokia 5800 but it's been cut back on some features.And if you are comparing it with the Samsung Star and with the LG Cookie i'd say the Nokia comes up on top.It has the Symbian OS v9,4 and it's a series 60 phone.If you are on the market looking for an affordable mid-range touchscreen phone i suggest you go ahead and buy it.recomended by Razlan
looks like nokia is trying to compete with lg cookie and samsung star. all these are low end touch screen phones. so for the masses this will be a great phone but for classes............ne ways thums up to nokia for putting on the show
quality of this phone is very poor.the screen is too bad,no secondary cam so you cannot make any video calls with 3g.5530 is better than this
Earlier was thinking to buy 5530 but now this one's the choice due to the still lower price!
all the benefits of symbian v5 at Rs 10k....Mind blowing!!
Just a compromise over camera and wifi but that will do.
Come on GSM Arena, be the first to review this phone.Waiting eagerly as I trust only your reviews...
all we knopw that the price of this phone is low.but this phone is not good because the phone hav only 2mp camera and no wifi and the handfree on the box is with very poor quality and anot reliable so please dont buy this phone this is a waste of money.i prefer u 5530 which is expensive bit but that phone is so great.
Anonymous, 27 Aug 2009I think the design of this phone is just going to make the Nokia 5800 look cheap! I mean, I al... moreHye. Looks terible I have als o the 5800 for about5 mounths I'm very happy with it and its a damn good phone
Aatif, 26 Aug 2009This one is going to be launched in 4th Quarter . mean which month ?? October, November or December; nice phone and very affordable too, it'll sell like hor cakes ;)