I'm totally supporting the fire that is finally opened against Nokia's bad phones!
I WAS ACTUALLY ALWAYS A NOKIA SUPPORTER, until Nokia started taking bad samples from Sony Ericcsson!
I agree with the users below.
6101/6102/6103/6125 and other series of the same line are cheap and stinky.
I don'n need to have a cell. phone that is SLOW and on which I cannot hear people well unless I'm wearing a BLUETOOTH TOY!
THE HELL WITH MEGAPIXELS AND COLOR SCREEN!
MATURE PEOPLE, PLEASE SUPPORT US!
I agree with Jonatan!
This phone is a piece of junk, just like the 6101 is.
NOKIA OBVIOUSLY CANNOT
make thin phones with loud sound.
Well, if that's the case, then why the hell make thin phones and not make it a little thicker just like a great 6170, 6260 models???????
I don't know what is all the excitment here about this so-called upgrade to 6101?
I checked this new 6103 at the local T-Mobile store in New York and it it the same garbage as 6101 only with added bluetooth which is a must for this phone, otherwise you will not hear loud enough in the crappy earpiece.
-Slow as 6101
-Childish very colorful as 6101
-Earpiece sound quality is not loud (again the same as 6101)
SO, YES BLUE TOOTH IS NEEDED DEFINITELY ON THIS NOT VERY LOUD PHONE, BUT WHAT ELSE?
one thing more. this nokia has different battery plug in than others nokia. i you have (well, like me)many others home chargers and car chargers and you need it right away....forget it.
this one is more thiner (about 2mm)and you'll need special adapter for others chargers to make them usefull(for phone side is male 2mm, and for charger is standard 3.5mm female, "+" inside "-" around, total length 10cm ) .
adapter cost 8euros. nice.
not to much?
ok, than pass that money to me.
this gsm is not so bad, but on the other sides....
i heard and red about 4.2mb of total memory, so i wonder where are the rest because i counted only 2.320mb in galeria and etc?
maybe operator stole it all? could be.
even 4.2mb are not enough memory and 2.320mb are way to little memory!!!!
this minus is so big that i do not want talk about any pluses present in nokia6103.
it's a great phone. I love it. But it has really bad reception (t-mobile). I had the Razor and the Pebl and Nokia 6610 but the 6103 has the worst reception. Does anybody else have the same problem? Is there anything to do? download some software or buy and antenna booster (do these things work?) thanks for any help or advice.
Great Phone!! As bizz says Nokia's are the most reliable Phone in the World along with great battery life and very good reception.Moto's are junk and Sammies are good for the most part. Ericsson even with Sony couldn't get it right and are pretty much gone from the US.
just bought it two days ago... everything is fine...except the memory storage> 4.2MB ONLY!! too small even to keep a song. therefore,the MP3 player in this phone is useless! regret to buy this phone. nevertheless, it's fine --- for only usual communication' use ---
to whom who has this phone: what do u think?
First of all, in the U.S., Nokia has the best signal, and the lowest return rate. It has been proven time and time again! Perfect Samsung and Sony? When did that happen. Look, if we really do research, we will see that Nokia is the most durable, reliable, and affordable phone on the market. Motorola Razr? Nice design, horrible performance. Samsung is okay, but none of these phones on the market are as reilaible as a Nokia. I would put any of my Nokia phones up against any Samsung or any other phone any day.
Nokia does have tri-band phones in it's line up and they are not $200 phones. The Nokia 6101 and 6103 are triband phones and neither are over $150.
The Nokia 6103 is a better phone than the 6101. The bluetooth is the first reason. Then it has the soft skin shell which feels really good in your hands. The infared works very well also. Both the Nokia 6101 and 6103 have a vga camera. However, the 6103 will be sold a lot more than the 6103 was. The keypad is raised and it has a more attractive look to it. Get yours soon.
This phone was created to mass, budget choice for people that dont pay more than $200 for a phone, people that dont have the $400 or $500 for 6230i or SE W800. In thisw case i go with SE Z520 that have more memory and BT
It's like the 6101, the only difference is the Bluetooth and the 6103 has less memory than the 6101. They should produce a phone with exactly the same desing as the 6101 and exactly the same fonctions as the 6230i, this should be a perfect phone, the only thing that Nokia should change on the DESING is to phone of different colours for exemple: red, blue and clear blue, pink and clear pink, purple and clear purple, green like above on performance, black, white, yellow, etc... because phones with funny colours are better sold. It's only my opinion, I hope you like it.
the only different from 6101 is Bluetooth ..
hope the price are not too far from 6101 now..
its not the same as the 6101 for camera quality, this is only 640*480 VGA when the camera for the 6101 was 1.3mega pixel, nokia made the camera worse on a newer updated model (idiots)
If Nokia 6103 is the same as 6101/6102 ( with only difference is added bluetooth), then it will have the same bad issues as 6101/6102:
MY SISTER HAS 6101 and
1)Very low earpiece volume (6170 is loud and perfect bytheway, because it is thicker!)
2)Very cheap slow processor ( menu system is slow as hell)
I HAVE 6170 and
1) The only Nokia phone today that has mature look
2)Phone has loud and clear volume (thanks to its normal thickness -DUH!)
3) Very well-organized and very fast menu!
SHAME ON NOKIA
But the only perfect or normal Nokia phones today are 6170, 6260, and 5140
yes it is the same all they did was add bluetooth and change the looks a bit