Nokia 6220 - user opinions and reviews

• Leo Laporte isa blok
• 27 Mar 2003

TO GSMARENA :

Would you please consider listeding the Interface release and interface version in the features section? For instance this phone uses Nokia Series 40. This will become increasing important as phone technologies progress..

Thanks for listing the other features-- this phone has what I want..

Gratefully,
LLLLLL

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Nokia Fan
• 26 Mar 2003

It looks like 6200 but there is a dofference:

Nokia 6220 has an Integrated Digital camera.

Nokia 6200 doesn't have it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ..//..
• 26 Mar 2003

Nice... SynchML, finally!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Leo Laporrticus
• 26 Mar 2003

Looks like a well balanced package to me. Lighter than the 3650 but with a nice classic keyboard. I could do without the camera however and will probably be buying a 6610.. Nokia should have a non-camera model, to help us shave $100 off the cost.

(Hmm... I wonder why my previsous post was removed by the gsmarena staff? Is there censureship going on this website??)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• TOYOTA FREAK
• 26 Mar 2003

Jakov what is inportent cam or quality?? and always the same design from all Nokia's phones.Do you think about it?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Jakov
• 24 Mar 2003

Shut up.This phone has better cam then X70 and GD87,it is like 7250,but it has better MMS(sound),and few better apps.Looks stylish,not in one-year trend.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• .
• 22 Mar 2003

what is the diff between this and 6610..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Mike
• 21 Mar 2003

...and another Nokia that looks exactly the same as ALL the other Nokia models! Don't they have any imagination?!?!?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 20 Mar 2003

it looks like 6200

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Craig B
• 19 Mar 2003

The design is too much like other Nokia Phones and looks to dull. If you want a good camera phone I think there are better ones out there i.e. Panasonic GD87

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• chidi
• 19 Mar 2003

This is the plenipotent gsm phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Leo Laporte
• 18 Mar 2003

Looks like a well balanced phone-- with a classic keyboard design. A better and lighter package than the 3650. Bluetooth and IDRA are unnecessary features and real costs, simply obviated by the info cable.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• /,./,./
• 17 Mar 2003

92 grams is too heavy stupid ME !!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• noels
• 17 Mar 2003

another same design and a bit of different feature from nokia!!!!!!!!!!!like a pain in da arse!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• laura
• 17 Mar 2003

beckham wouldnt be seen dead with that!
it looks shit!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• loura elsa
• 16 Mar 2003

an exact copy of 6200 thats why I hate nokia, why do they always make similar phones?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Mike
• 15 Mar 2003

Nokia 6310 i -the best!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mc
• 14 Mar 2003

it looks like nokia 6610

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Toyota freak
• 14 Mar 2003

No bluetooth or Irda what a shame.Always the same desing from Nokia,i am realy piss of to Nokia.I will not buy it,that crappy pfone from Nokia.So i am go for the T610 much better techniek and screen and better looks frech and cool desing.

I go for SE for now no Nokia more until the have better techniek.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Bahbah
• 14 Mar 2003

The most important thing is the wap2.0 GPRS/EDGE .. A New Technology :)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report