It looks like 6200 but there is a dofference:
Nokia 6220 has an Integrated Digital camera.
Nokia 6200 doesn't have it
Looks like a well balanced package to me. Lighter than the 3650 but with a nice classic keyboard. I could do without the camera however and will probably be buying a 6610.. Nokia should have a non-camera model, to help us shave $100 off the cost.
(Hmm... I wonder why my previsous post was removed by the gsmarena staff? Is there censureship going on this website??)
Jakov what is inportent cam or quality?? and always the same design from all Nokia's phones.Do you think about it?
Shut up.This phone has better cam then X70 and GD87,it is like 7250,but it has better MMS(sound),and few better apps.Looks stylish,not in one-year trend.
...and another Nokia that looks exactly the same as ALL the other Nokia models! Don't they have any imagination?!?!?
The design is too much like other Nokia Phones and looks to dull. If you want a good camera phone I think there are better ones out there i.e. Panasonic GD87
Looks like a well balanced phone-- with a classic keyboard design. A better and lighter package than the 3650. Bluetooth and IDRA are unnecessary features and real costs, simply obviated by the info cable.
another same design and a bit of different feature from nokia!!!!!!!!!!!like a pain in da arse!!
an exact copy of 6200 thats why I hate nokia, why do they always make similar phones?
No bluetooth or Irda what a shame.Always the same desing from Nokia,i am realy piss of to Nokia.I will not buy it,that crappy pfone from Nokia.So i am go for the T610 much better techniek and screen and better looks frech and cool desing.
I go for SE for now no Nokia more until the have better techniek.