Very good! If you were right that is! I was referring to what you've already written. Iíd bet you re-read what I wrote several times trying to catch a mistake. haha! And all you can do is call me "s-hole" and say how bad my family is? This only proves that you lack family love and therefore have to talk bad about other peopleís families (this is proven by the way). Great going there fella. Hereís another advice for ya: go rinse off that potty mouth of yours and move on. Iím sure other people are sick of this. Mail me if you need more education. And yes, that is my real email address.
haha... s-hole RyoaSaeba, " what I said did had some "... should be "have" instead of "had"... u seems to me like an uneducated son of the bitch leh... after all, now you have write lesser which i guess no one by your side to do it for you or u running out of money. I just cannot believe u are from US, a easily angry, petty person who don't know how to read and just a disgrace to your whole family
Thanks for proving my point again and again Mr angry 6260user. It's good to see that your writing has already improved since your "review" though. Looks almost like 2 different person! I guess what I said did had some kind of impact on your writing style... too bad I can't help you on your personality.
And it's write, not right. Have a nice day! :)
Haha, my words can make u right stories, RyoSaeba. At least u shown that your mum can send u to school (whore?), haha. Guess only technology dumb people like u don't understand, but nevermind i forgive u. Also give u an clap after u show me u can right something... :P
Simple is right, I've seen 5th graders write with better style then you. Besides, it was just a simple suggestion on your writing. Can't believe this puts you in such anger, and on a message board I might add! Getting angry on a message board in cyberspace on someone you don't know is truly pathetic don't you think?
I never said I donít understand what you've written. I just said itís hard to read. Open a book, a magazine, or a newspaper, do they write like you? I donít think so. But I do know that from now on, any review you write, you will write in a more readable fashion. If not, youíd at lease think about writing it with more neatness.
You can say all you want about what you think I am but I can truly care less. Fact is, I donít know you and you don know me. But I know how you wrote and what you've said. And that usually translates to your real personality. Just think about how angry you sound tells me you are very short tempered and get offended very easily, even with strangers thousands of miles away that you'll never meet.
Anyway, these will probably get deleted and no one will ever know who you or me really are. So just relax and enjoy your Nokia 6260 phone.
Hi,RyoSaeba, so u are from US. I am very shocked as I thought u are a chinaman. Shock as in, you can't even understand what I written. This is very pathetic of you that you did not receive proper education and ended up don't understand simple langauge. I pity your parents who have no $ to send u to school...
Honestly, how you write reflects what you are in life. You write a review for people to see. But if it's hard to read and understand, then the power of your review will be less effective.
In reply to your comments, how can I be "unhappy" about something I had not try? Yes, I preorder, so what? I can still cancel if something better comes out. You on the other hand are stuck. Also, liking or not liking a phone is your personal opinion. As you've seen other comments, some love it, some don't. THATíS THEIR OPINION! Here in US, we are entitle to our opinions. You can't TELL people to hate a phone just because you don't like it. A phone that doesnít fit your needs or wants might be perfect for others.
I never stated if I like it or not because I don't have it yet. Most likely, I will like it because I'm a die hard Nokia fan. I've always owned Nokia. From 2160, 6190, 8290, 7210, to what I have now, a 6108.
Nokia is never known for their outer quality. It's their software, functions, and menu placements that I love. I have used other phones and they just don't compare to way Nokia menus functions. But this is my opinion. You are entitle to yours and me to mine.
XXX u got to understand, I am giving a complete review on 6260 and s-hole like RyoSaeba who have preorder this phone, which I guess feel unhappy because the quality of the phone is not good. In fact, he just need to face the fact that this phone is not good. He cannot face reality.
What's wrong with u guys....c'mon we're talking about 6260 reviews not English Class Session....
btw,this phone is greater than K700i...I'm going to sell my K700i....it's real suck phone and I'll buy this phone...When it release in Indonesia????
the phine functions great. NO problem with the upper and lower keys. read the review>>>>
I don't loke small phones or very big phones, I think this is the ideal one for me.
lol it took me 5 minutes to figure where to slice the sim card in lol.
nice phone though.
As for the connection quality the device rouses no any cavils, the phone works well. The volume of the polyphonic call signal is average and it may be heard in the room but problems appear in a noisy street. The power of the vibrating alert is also average. I'd like to stress that polyphony remains a weak point in the phones by Nokia. The device is much inferior to Korean phones and models by Siemens, Motorola. The only way out is to set an MP3 melody as a call signal and all other variants do not look acceptable (the quality of the sound is acceptable but not more, it is better to set MP3). The mono output may be referred to the minuses, this prevents from using the device as an MP3 player. Such files serve only as call signals. And by the way according to the manufacturer the model has 48-tone polyphonic alert that has to sound well. The disadvantages of the call signal are connected with its principal realization mostly and the quality of the loud speaker. The manufacturer announced FM-radio and stereo sound for radio mode. That is rather strange because then mp3 compositions (software realization) should be stereo. But it is not so. We didn't manage to check if the radio sound is stereo or mono because cloudn't think out a corresponding test. We'd be glad to get your ideas on the matter. The difference between mono and stereo sound of the radio is imperceptible by heart.The model is more experimental and it may have got the 7 index but not 6-series. The phone can't be called a business solution and is a fashion one (similar to Nokia 7610, Siemens SX1) because the comfort of work with the majority of the applications is not achieved. The presence of the integrated radio set (that is not a business function), 32 MB memory card in the standard kit (for instance, 64 MB card is included into the standard kit of Nokia 7610) indicate the phone refers to a different class.This smartphone with the price of 380-400 USD is a solution for those who liked the design and the dimensions do not scare away. There are no any advantages over existing solutions by Nokia in this model and technically it is the same phone (for example, Nokia 6600 is quite the same, Nokia 7610, 6670 are better thanks to the camera and the battery). The ergonomics of the model doesn't amaze and even disappoints in some kind. It is not clear who the target group is. The dimensions are too big for a fashion solution but the keypad is uncomfortable for everyday work. In some kind the only rival is Siemens SX1. Both phones are represented in the same class, coming disguised as business solutions they are fashion phones. Considering the sales of Siemens SX1 we may surely say the sales of Nokia 6260 will be low. This is a niche solution in the line of the company and an abrupt decrease of the price will hardly save it.
I'll note the model is a commercial product and is taken accidentally from the ones being sold in a usual shop. Test showed the described problems are characteristic for one third of the devices today (in this or that combination). The first thing that I was surprised by is the presence of comparatively large (read noticeable) gaps around the screen. A gap was so large in one of the models that a factory dust may have been seen there. In the dark with the backlighting on the presence of the gaps rouses no doubts, the device looks not very neatly. The second thing that roused astonishment is incorrect positioning of the screen, the display doesn't match the edging in the plastic. It is a bit dislocated in the diagonal for about 1 mm and it is viewed clearly in the picture. Having found such a mistake I considered the device attentively. The camera gap is dislocated wrong also, just compare two circles (on the camera and on the plastic). The mistake is not very critical and is more a matter of aesthetics. Similar inaccuracies tell that the production line responsible for the model is not fixed still and has little faults. The found mistakes do concern the appearance of the phone mostly.
If to look at the camera gap in the dark (the device is open, the keypad backlighting is off) you'll see a small lighted lag (a reflection of the 1 button). I admit I do not remember similar imperfections in other models by Nokia. It seems the reason is that the German factory still has not settled the production of the model.