Go for the SE k850, its has got everything here plus Xenon flash, Accelerometer.
Forget GPS and Wifi, the battery is too weak to hold them for even 15 mins !!!
S40 is such a bad platform... really dont mind,,,,,, symbian is far far better than S40
this mobile is not gonna be success may be... but nokia seems like releasing it at 600-700 US $
which is worse price for such a fone...
HTC fones with better features and far better WINDOWS OS are already available in market with VGA display, low weight and superior performence (600 Mhz) @ 450$-500$
Sony Ericsson Xperia which is already in stores at about 750 - 800 US $ which is far far far more superior
HTC advantage @ 950 USD
HTCtOUCH PRO AT 700 USD
HTC Shift @ 1300 USD
Motorola ZN5 at just 320 USD is a better fone than this one... beats it even if it is available @ 500 USD
So dear nokia sorry for the CRAP.... I hate u... because you have announced an INSANE FONE
these are real high end fones
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2008i still dont get nokia, i think this phone just the slide version of 6220 classic, no 3.5mm ja... moreIf you dont want the phone, get an n79, n82, 6210 or 6220c. They are around the same price bracket. Secondly, if they did like you asked, im sure there will be someone else complaining of nokia duplicating their already existing phones.
Besides, i think this is a great step up for s40 phones. At least it comes with wifi, a good screen, a good camera, gps and many other goodies. Stop focusing on what it doesnt have and be thankful for the goodies it has.
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2008i still dont get nokia, i think this phone just the slide version of 6220 classic, no 3.5mm ja... moreIt's like the 6220 Classic (but without S60, a Xenon flash and poor bettary life) in a slider form factor with a better screen resolution.
Some people will like that - I do! Some people will want 6220 Classic features with S40 instead - I do! ;)
Currently listening to: Bad Brains - Quickness
i still dont get nokia, i think this phone just the slide version of 6220 classic, no 3.5mm jack, s40 user system(whick sucks for me), 15 fps, same crapy keypad of 6220(looks cheap), no accelerometer, kind of boring everyday design with a rear of same 6220, nokia has finaly lost the "it" factor, there are much better phones of nokia of same price series.... this phone does not make any sence. Nokia you could have done better than this.....it has all the signs of becoming the flop of the year!!!!!! This what i felt after seeing it!
There are no best than Linux Operating System
s80 + s60 + s40 < Linux
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2008S40 ISSSSSS symbian dude :laughsoutloudbigtime:S40 isn't symbian, symbian is s60 or s90
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2008This is the s40 version of n95Yes it is, I agree.
NICE thank you Nokia!
iv always wanted a S40 - N95 features phone
It looks cool with 5 mp camera, but its design is same as 6600 slide, This model will really rock the party, 6260 Carry on Nokia....
good thing nokia decided to make the right resolution to a 2.4 inch screen. i mean the nokia n96 has a 2.8 inch screen but it only have a 230x320 res. so it looks bit bad. GO 6260!!!
Im the first to comment this phone.
It definitely looks ugly. Nokia should think better on creating new & different phones, i dont understand why they are repeating same models, with new features??
They are just releasing the phones that they want, they are not bothered about the user.
holy sh*t net speed 10,2 mbps that allways means that other companys will realese speed up to 14,4 mbps