Great mobile ..
But I wanna know what is the differance between the VGA & QCIF video quality and which is better ???
plz answer me .
more rubbish from nokia nearly same features as 6233 with same screen and camera which is rubbish rubish rubish
I WANT ONE, it's just want I need, slim, great design and just right :) plus metal casing, cool! no frills but just brilliantly executed
just a bar phone and dont have any design and dont have flash at the camera
The combination of size, stainless steel casing, and good features with the solid build from Nokia make this a perfect choice :) Looks super cool, 2GB MicroSD means no more need for my ipod!
Oh my God, the Design is perfect.
But in Features and Performance is the N73 much better than this "old" Phone.
I miss 3G and Qvga-Video funktion 15 and 30 Fps
a 5 MP cam and so on...
no symbian....no flash...no autofocus...video recording is still qcif???...nokia have to improve their phones features
Seems to me like a hybrid version of 3230 n n73... there are a lot of similarities... dont you think so?
Gosh, this looks freakin' cool, guys. But I think the phone is 13.1 mm thin, not 11.7 mm. But still the thinnest cell that I have known from Nokia. I just checked out some news and according to it, this cool handset would be released during the first quarter of 2007 and for around 250 euros.
i might get it depends if theres no otha phone i can get sonyerricson or samsung ==but my 6233 is very similar to it only differnce is this has 16M colours and (qcif) video and this has 1mb more memory 7.8mb.
well u ppl alway say Nokia are always make FAT phones well this is skinny for a chance so u ppl should be thankful to nokia for this silmline design -- but my 6233 has dual stereo speakers and this doesnt this is the succecor of 6233 but no spekers lets hope nokia put them in or maybe the design made it so there was no room letf for STEREO SPEAKERS this is wat happens with slim phones PPL FAT PHONES ARE BETTER