I like to color, but the battery is the same to with original 6300 and talking time is shorter. Why Nokia never make in good package such as: Nokia N810 all the condition i love, but have no camera....
it's a copy of nokia 6301,
Wi-Fi is the only difference between it & 6300, but why Wi-Fi on Bad Battery..!!??
I did buy the Nokia6300
had bad battery life.....
unless that is taken care of by Nokia.
I do not think there is going to be considerable interest in this.
what a pity it is a wonderful phone except for the battery life.
I'm using BL-5C no problem. My solution for users of this model - buy battery BL-5C. The cover close a little hard, but it's all. Now I'm talking apporx ~1-1,5h/per day, and standby time for me 2 days is enough
i'm not comparing a 6300 to a 6233. i'm saying that nokia should think of coming out with a 6233i instead of puting a grey cover onto a 6301 and calling it a 6300i. by the way the 6220 smartphone is not the 6233's sucessor.
Ufff.... Dont go for this machine ... Nice offer , 512 Mb card , + 30 Mb internal , But original 6300 was a oure mess and crap . plus both chapms are slip with Xtreme Poor battary time ....
So Bye .. 6300 or 6300i
from what i saw doesn't the 6301 release have the same features like the 6300i? the only changes are the phone color but the performance is the same...if the nokia company wanted to make a good release they should have worked on a 6300 version and make a life long battery and put a flash at the 2mp camera and maybe to put the w-lan as well...nokia 6300 was the 2007 model and many people still use it...nokia could make this change and release a great 6300 update that can be a blast......
6233 is better then 6300 is some Aspects, one of them including battery life
to me the upgraded 6233 is the New 6220 Classic.
whats up with Nokia and poor battery life these days?? They dare to put WiFi support into the phone without upgrading the battery... its crap and you have to charge it every f****** day... buy Sony Ericsson, the masters of battery life.
i don't mean that, i only meant why did nokia come out with a modified version of the 6300 called the 6300i instead of making an improved version of the 6233 called the 6233i.
very simple : w w w . b u x . t o / ? r = p i g u _ 2 0 0 7 up to 300$ mountly
I do not know what Nokia Thinking. Make 6500 nice and thin with 3G, and now 6300i with Wi-Fi and no 3G plus poor battery life as original Nokia 6300. What Nokia thinking?
They just using same board with different looking covers and call it a new phone. with small modifications. I guess one way of showing Nokia is very busy in introducing many phoen to keep up with compatitors.
Why Nokia no get in PDA and touch screen market like others are in?