Nokia 6630 - user opinions and reviews

• Tim
• 15 Aug 2004

This is amazing phone only it's size is a -
I want to buy this phone but before I buy it;
''Does anybody know if the 6630 a stereo function has or only a mono function?''

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Domas
• 14 Aug 2004

may be the 6630 not that pretty, but side by side to the sony ericsson designs this is marvelous :)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Shane
• 13 Aug 2004

Hi, im currently shopping around for a phone, im definately getting a nokia but i am trying to decide whether to get a 6230 now, or wait and get the amazing 6630. i cant decide which would be better, i dont like the screen size of the 6230, its really too small i think. Is there anything in the 6230 that is better, or that the 6630 doesnt have?

Ps: would anybody have any idea as to what price the 6630 would be? i presume its gonna be pretty pricey!!!!
Any replies would be appreciated. thanks

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 12 Aug 2004

may i know when this phone will be out in the market? esp in malaysia or singapore? thx

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• dilawer
• 12 Aug 2004

good

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• bakr
• 12 Aug 2004

how matche the 6630

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• swapnil
• 11 Aug 2004

1.3mp camcor upto 1hr brills !!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 11 Aug 2004

no infrared but bluetooth 1.2 and usb 2.0 !!!!
:)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• farazi
• 10 Aug 2004

i think that this is the beautiful phone in the world

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• tj
• 08 Aug 2004

i realy love this product.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• adegoke tobiloba
• 07 Aug 2004

nokiais avery good phone.it is extremely different from others.it lasts longer than others
.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• raj
• 07 Aug 2004

no infrared!!! yak

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 07 Aug 2004

Do u (NOKIA HATEST`S)really think the smallest 3G handset candybar(in in the world) with 1,2 mpix and marvellous features would look like a princess....? ...ööö...enpä usko (do not think so)...espesially, if u haven`t noticed the features....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Leo Laporte
• 05 Aug 2004

Looks like a very good update to the 6600.

Designed for the power user, to whom features are king. Not horrible looking, but not jewlery either.

To those who prefer "jewlery-phones" then look at Moto's sleek new RAZR! (All symbian phones look ugly I think..)

If you wish to get business done while on the move, look to Nokia and other Symbian phones.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Panda
• 04 Aug 2004

if u dont own 1 dont badmouth it.B4 i got the 6600 i thought it was a bit of a brick.After less than 3 weeks with it it shrunk in my hand and im still learing about it and how it does things easlier than it predecessors.I would luv to get my hands on the Nokia software that allows it to record for long periods.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Jamie
• 03 Aug 2004

Designed for people who has no style. Simple sucks!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Omar
• 02 Aug 2004

Hi,
I Think Its Wonderful Mobile But What Do You Think About Captring Photos ?..
Is It Slow Like 7610 ?..

Nokia 7610 Takes Long Time To Save The PIcture..

Is This Phone The Same Or Faster ?...

Please Reply :)

Thanks, Bye!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ANYTHING BUT THIS
• 01 Aug 2004

the designer of the phone must be shot within 10 yards.nokia thinks she has got a chance again p910.lets show nokia that the phone is a total failure.who is with me guys?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 01 Aug 2004

ugly but with impressive features imo

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 31 Jul 2004

Go back and making rubber boots. :p

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report