Nokia 6630 - user opinions and reviews

• raj
• 07 Aug 2004

no infrared!!! yak

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 07 Aug 2004

Do u (NOKIA HATEST`S)really think the smallest 3G handset candybar(in in the world) with 1,2 mpix and marvellous features would look like a princess....? ...ööö...enpä usko (do not think so)...espesially, if u haven`t noticed the features....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Leo Laporte
• 05 Aug 2004

Looks like a very good update to the 6600.

Designed for the power user, to whom features are king. Not horrible looking, but not jewlery either.

To those who prefer "jewlery-phones" then look at Moto's sleek new RAZR! (All symbian phones look ugly I think..)

If you wish to get business done while on the move, look to Nokia and other Symbian phones.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Panda
• 04 Aug 2004

if u dont own 1 dont badmouth it.B4 i got the 6600 i thought it was a bit of a brick.After less than 3 weeks with it it shrunk in my hand and im still learing about it and how it does things easlier than it predecessors.I would luv to get my hands on the Nokia software that allows it to record for long periods.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Jamie
• 03 Aug 2004

Designed for people who has no style. Simple sucks!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Omar
• 02 Aug 2004

Hi,
I Think Its Wonderful Mobile But What Do You Think About Captring Photos ?..
Is It Slow Like 7610 ?..

Nokia 7610 Takes Long Time To Save The PIcture..

Is This Phone The Same Or Faster ?...

Please Reply :)

Thanks, Bye!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ANYTHING BUT THIS
• 01 Aug 2004

the designer of the phone must be shot within 10 yards.nokia thinks she has got a chance again p910.lets show nokia that the phone is a total failure.who is with me guys?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 01 Aug 2004

ugly but with impressive features imo

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 31 Jul 2004

Go back and making rubber boots. :p

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 30 Jul 2004

Looks like toilet shape Wow what a design Nokia !! genius ways to lure customers

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Andy
• 28 Jul 2004

nokia... go back to your original business operation...cutting trees down in third world countries!!!!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Tylup
• 26 Jul 2004

Nokia 6630 is 3G and SE P910 not.

You should compare SE P910 with Nokia 9500 Communicator but then again... SE P910 lacks WLAN, for example.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• NOKIA LOVER
• 24 Jul 2004

hahaha...NOKIA SUCKS!!!!...
hehehe..no need to compare it with p910...just compare it with ERICSSON T10/T18/GF-768..hueheuheuheuhuehue...
that's would be equal.. :)
..see the newest SE phones..s700 p910!
but the positive point is..i see in this phone..nokia try the new materials (actually SE has been use it since hmm...loooonnnng time ago).. hihihi

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• nawaf
• 23 Jul 2004

try to compare this silly phone with SonyEricsson new P910. u will see the difference in your eyes !

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 23 Jul 2004

Innostream, Haier and Mitac brand phones are more beautiful than nokia in term of design and color resolutions.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mrdjape
• 22 Jul 2004

...(sorry) globalists decides to put some new technologies for us. I'm sick of this "on a spoon" implementations. 2 days batteries, 5k, 65k, 256k color displays, 130 gr? I dont have pockets that strong and big.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mrdjape
• 22 Jul 2004

I'm sitting here reading all this datas, opinions, and still don't understand why I have to buy extra bag to carry all those new things just to call someone. Hibernate me for a few years, just to wake up, when these

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Mrs. Horse
• 22 Jul 2004

I found this phone incredibly fiddly and difficult to use. Then again, I am a horse.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• kit
• 22 Jul 2004

its the alpeen of Herculean

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• jjj
• 22 Jul 2004

good, but very-very big and ungly

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report