Sahity, 09 May 2009the sound quality of 6720 is better because its got two stereo speakers and 6220 has got one m... morealso, think id prefer xenon, 30fps and carl zeiss optics than stereo speakers and a 3.5mm slot. peace!
Sahity, 09 May 2009the sound quality of 6720 is better because its got two stereo speakers and 6220 has got one m... morecheck out the audio section of the classic, its pretty impressive especially for a mono speaker.
hope the finish/paint on the phone doesnt chip like in the pics section of the 6720!
the next of 6220c but downgrade of camera quality..it hasn't xenon flash only dual led n without lens cover..
Anonymous, 07 May 2009sorry i read it wrong,,, but how can you say the sound quality is better when its not out yet ... morethe sound quality of 6720 is better because its got two stereo speakers and 6220 has got one mono speaker.
stereo speakers of nokia have always sounded better, in terms of clarity.
6220 mono speaker is a loud one but not really a clear audio experience, which i am expecting from 6720, which seems to have similar speakers as to those found in the n-series
Sahitya, 05 May 2009when will this phone release, i m waiting eagerly to buy it. as far as comparisons with nokia... moresorry i read it wrong,,, but how can you say the sound quality is better when its not out yet nor has been reviewed?
Sahitya, 05 May 2009when will this phone release, i m waiting eagerly to buy it.
as far as comparisons with nokia... moredidnt you say u have this as an upgrade? but then u say u wonder if the dynomite lights up???? huh?!?!?!u have it or u dont?
also how can you say the sound quality is better if you dont have it and it hasnt been reviewed yet? check the 6220c for sound quality..6720 better?..i doubt it
6220c is overall a better phone IMO.
this has got a slightly better cpu speed and battery life and a 3.5mm slot. other than that, 6220 is better in ever department. considering its simple to find a 2.5 to 3.5 adaptor for the 6220c,its also smaller, with xenon flash and vga@30fps.
mr jojo, 04 May 2009im back nokia6220c is betteragreed and smaller too
when will this phone release, i m waiting eagerly to buy it.
as far as comparisons with nokia 6220c, this one has an edge over it as its got a better battery and sound quality. only difference in camera is that 6220c has xenon flash and this one has dual led. xenon is fine if u are into a lot of night photography. for ocassional night shots, i think dual led is fine and also doesnt take up as much battery life as a xenon does.
since this was an upgrade from 6220c, i think nokia could have added a bigger screen atleast 2.4 and an accelorometer. wifi not necessary, adds bulk to the phone.
i like the back design of this phone with the camera surrounded by dymante. i wonder if the dymante would light up along with the led flash - i doubt it.
looks good. great on features. well positioned speakers. 3.5 mm jack :)
good camera. nice interface. i hope its priced right. lesser than 6710 navigator i hope.
n85 is superior phone no doubt, but then it comes with a higher price as well.
however 6720c is a good multimedia phone
it's precious goods and i think it's bussiness handphone and smartphone
it look like a better version of 6220 Classic, if the camera is just as good, i am getting this !!!
Dani, 19 Apr 2009Im waiting for it to release. It is releasing in the month of june
This phone is having all the good features like 5mp cam with carl zeiss lenses,Tv out,even the processor is 600mhz that gives a high downloading and surfing speed only the feature i.e wifi is not given . . . .
Robert, 20 Feb 2009In 6220c is xenon flash, 30 fps recording, bet baterry is very bad In 6720c is better baterryI have a N82 and is so perfect FOR ME... Shame with Nokia using their weir Dual LED flash... This 6720 is the perfect sample about the abandonment of Xenon Flash... Nokia, Shame with you, i think if you keep doing this stupid things i'll consider buy SE Idou next year, also, Idou will be Symbian :)