its realy going on dabbng.......i have use symbian^3 but symbian belle is 3 time faster from symb 3......
One request to gsmarena, plz correct the spec of this phone by adding these feature..
It has got
ARM 11 Processor,
512 MB Ram,
1 GB Rom..
Many people misjudging this phone becoz it is not mention in the specification. Try to give acqurate info..
First I want to know why these people are not coming up with 3G Video calling facilty.Then what is the use of buying this phone if bnetwork are providing 3G facility and Phone is not supported then how can we go for this.
Nokia has to think about this issue to increase there market as well as to maintain the Name it has in Mobile production.
This Phone would be successful if Nokia cares to read opinions on the respected GSMARENA.
Nokia 700 should not have come without at least 8mp autofocus camera; Front facing cam but may traditionally remain on Symbian. You can bet the outcome of this.
Im seriously considering Sony Ericsson Xperia Ray instead.
Ando, 29 Aug 2011Y do Nokia always opt for fixed focus camera whereas everyone goes for autofocus at d same pri... moreu r quite right. Ve bn waiting 4 Nokia come wt this dimensions, (compare to SE xperia Ray) but wt 8mp cam & face cam. Im again dissapointed.
Ando, can Nokia delay the release to install this or may come up wt a revised version?
AnonD-20071, 31 Aug 2011WHats the rate.... and exactly when its going to launch????This quarter, september then.
vikram, 30 Aug 2011hey anybody know the expected price....please tell me..Euro 260-280 I think
Santa Claus , 29 Aug 2011then don't buy it.Thanx.. I'm not buying that.. if it came up with the secondary camera, autofocus sure then i'll buy one..
I want a secondary camera just for some aspects.. Then who'll buy the fixedfocus camera..??
Obviously Nokia doesn't want to sell its phones, cannot see another reason not to have a camera with autofocus...Silly Nokia
Wow ! I am crazy about nokia 700.though This is the time for androied but if we compare all the aspects then Symbian is the best.because the most important thing for a mobile is battery,androied drain battery too quick.After all Symbian with nokia is best because-
From my great C5 I’m using internet in my laptop(using the phone as a modem).Speed is awesome, especially 3g speed, But without installing the nokia Pc Suite.
Because I connect my phone with laptop through Bluetooth and the default bluetooth software is already given by the manufacturer
of the my laptop(DELL).now when I try LG gt540 optimus phone which price is Rs.11920(when I purchased)(plz check the specification of the phone in www.gsmarena.com/),for connecting internet
by this way it showed that "No service found".now immediately I contact with lg customer care.
They reply me that,You have to install the Lg's software(I don't know the name of the F**king software)
otherwise you can't use the phone as a modem through bluetooth.Ha ha ha LG gt540 optimus a androied phone.
now the great thing is that, I confirm from the manufacturer of my laptop(DELL),that the maximum bluetooth services is only given
by NOKIA only.such as-
1.OBEX Object push
2. Data transfer
4.OBEX file transfer
5.Hands-free audio gateway
and LG gives only 3 services-
1. Data transfer
2. Hands-free audio gateway
3. OBEX file transfer
and also samsung gives 5 services.
I just write here only one of my experience with nokia,but there is various example of nokia by which nokia is no.1 in mobile phone.
NOKIA keep it up... .... ...
AnonD-18618, 27 Aug 2011it is good that there's the Symbian Belle but it will be better if Nokia will include secondar... moreNokia websites states it supports video calling.
Or you can go for 701 which has secondary camera, the price difference slightly more.