John, 03 Oct 2019Revive the windows Os pleaseThat will be Microsoft... but i am sure you ain't gonna see it happen.
Subramanian CN, 02 Oct 2019Yes, I do say the same thing again by stressing it by adding one more word; "Though Android is... moreDid you just gone wikipedia on me? Youp, the debate is over. It makes no sense do continue a discusion with someone who talks only flying donkies then calls me unkowing then goes wikipedia on me trying to clearify a laughable claim with real facts. Oh, nope, thanks. Have a good day too.
Carol, 02 Oct 2019Talking giberisch again to mask the fact that you actually do not understand how technology wo... moreYes, I do say the same thing again by stressing it by adding one more word; "Though Android is open for all it has indirectly become the property of Google alone since no one uses it." Try to understand the meaning of it properly by asking someone who knows better.
Android was developed initially by Android Inc., before it was bought by Google, The core Android source code is primarily licensed under the Apache License which is a free software license written by Apache Software Foundation.
The choultry built by Google has indirectly become the property of Google alone since no other person is ready to use it. Now, this choultry is governed by a Closed Source Software App of Google - The "Play Store". I am not saying anything wrong about Google. I am just explaining how they function. Let us end our debate here. If you still feel that I am wrong, so be it. Good Luck and Bye, bye.
Subramanian CN, 02 Oct 2019Thanks for the detailed explanation. A simple psychological relevance. Microsoft or anyone wil... moreP.s sorry for being roude. Sometimes i get angry when i here wrong claims.
Subramanian CN, 02 Oct 2019Thanks for the detailed explanation. A simple psychological relevance. Microsoft or anyone wil... moreTalking giberisch again to mask the fact that you actually do not understand how technology works, does not make it any better. You said: "Though Android is open for all it has indirectly become the property of Google since no one uses it. This is the reason why Google takes pain in developing Android"
Can anyone help me with a good back cover for this nokia 7.2 here in india. I cant understand when all companies are giving back cover with mobile then why cant nokia provide one. There are barely cases available for cheap android phones.
Carol, 02 Oct 2019You can sure talk a lot but what you say has little to nothing to do with reallity. First of a... moreThanks for the detailed explanation. A simple psychological relevance. Microsoft or anyone will not buy or acquire something just because someone wishes to sell theirs. Without a wish no one would buy anything. The content of my message is to clarify people as to how the world works who doesn't know much like you do. Time will clarify everything. As you have said I might be wrong and you are right. Before ending up, I never talked about ownership of an Open Source Software. I only said it is totally free. I have said that iOS is more secured than Android. I haven't said that iOS is totally secured. For your information there is nothing in this world that is completely secured. Everything in this world has a backdoor. Even if there is none someone will create one. The world is reading all our messages here. Let them decide. Thanking you once again for your reply.
Lukearse, 02 Oct 2019Are you high😵😵!! As you have asked for help I shall help you, but I will not teach you, as ... moreSometimes I am highly sentimental. The world is becoming a graveyard because of the resident evil(s) in many people. What can I expect from the world that has crucified Lord Jesus and assassinated good human beings like Mahatma Gandhi? The world has been cursed when it crucified Lord Jesus. I Love Lord Jesus a lot though I am not a christian. He is a great friend of mine. Though he can forgive us, can we forgive ourselves. Everyone tries to become great without thinking about whether they are doing anything good.
Subramanian CN, 02 Oct 2019Which is the best, Open Source or Closed Source? There is no one word answer to this. It depen... moreYou can sure talk a lot but what you say has little to nothing to do with reallity. First of all, it is way easier to build backdoors in a closed source system, why is that? Cause nobody outside has the code, therefore nobody can actually see what you are doing. Of course, those who actually know something and want to spend a lot of time in reading the code (something that happend not a long time ago when there was a backdoor found in apple's products) can interfere with an apple firmware update and retrieve the code at some extantion, open it and start looking what is where and why... but do you even understand what a backdoor means? Probably not. Second, security has nothing to do with the systems beeing closed or opened. Actually i would bet on a opened then on a closed one, just cause on the opened one their are a tone of developers that struggle to make it safer and close the gaps. Third going back to the sources, any change in a opened source program, can and will be read by all developers that have something to do with it's development. Let's assume there are one, two hackers that will try to hack the system, but their written code is read by a tone of developers, then it has to be accepted by the head of developement and only then will be able to be pushed up in the master build. So much for packing backdoors ain't it? What a company does after taking the source into it's developement wing, is something else, and looks pretty much the same as apple, the code the x company further develope is a in-hause backery that no "outsider" can read (well, let's not forget anything can be seen if somebody really wants to), if they pack backdoors, well, apple did it... To end up with making the d understand: on the source you cannot do whatever you want, it ain't anarchy here. But you can take the code and do whatever you want with it on your side. Henche the FREE dilemma, cause really is free, an operating system whos source is actually free to use. Pretty much a copy paste, work on it, keep it for your self or try to sell it or... whatever. And the last one: it was not a microsoft mistake to buy Nokia. It was a Nokia mistake to work with microsoft. Any sain human can see the reality: Elop-> Mole killed Nokia -> sold it to microsoft, the perfect backdoor example.
Nokia had a great system in it's development, the MeeGo, whos features are now to be seen in apples system and a bit in android. A system that was waaay ahead of it's time. They also had Symbian, a system whos capabilities till today are not surpassed and they had android comming hard. So you really think Nokia with all it's power and choices was going for Microsoft because they found it better? Or because that mole actually betrayed them in the most sneeky manner? Youp, the second is Gold, and it is actually a case to be written in history with the title: the snake of Nokia. As for all other giberisch of yours... android had another name and was bought by google if i am not mistaking in 2005. An open source does not mean, no owner... Where do you get your information? From the magic book of i know nothing? As i am tired to tackle all your high laughable "jokes" written here, i end up by saying: better teach yourself before talking would make much more sense when you talk and you won't be making a "full" out of your self when doing it...
Subramanian CN, 01 Oct 2019I know that you believe in Closed Source Operating System as you've talked about Windows Mobil... moreI didn't say about the benefits of closed source OS, I have just said that I have nothing to do with that. It really doesn't matter to me as a user. I like windows mobile because the UI on the phone and on my PC is the same, I love this. the way I edit photos on my PC and on my phone is the same. There were some Microsoft services also, common apps were in the store. but they always came up with poor hardware and could not attract the customers, the market share went down, lost the attention of the devs that created the app gap. Otherwise, it was a good OS. there were live tiles and I can select a specific image for the photos tiles which is awesome. I can do that with "Launcher 10" on android but it will drain the battery faster and when you enter into any app the UI is the same boring and toyish.
Subramanian CN, 01 Oct 2019As you have asked for help I shall help you, but I will not teach anyone because I always like... moreAre you high😵😵!!
As you have asked for help I shall help you, but I will not teach you,
as I am your friend not a teacher.
Please stop smoking so much weed!!! You're too high!!!
Subramanian CN, 30 Sep 2019What is an Open Eco System and how does it differ from the Closed Eco System and how does it i... moreI hope you are a developer then let me know one answer "Can i Develop iphone/ios app on windows ? which apple have restricted but you can do it vice-versa.
Another one Why can't i transfer files to IPHONE via bluetooth from an android phone?
For Android better features can't you just search on internet what android os have provided us since many years and where Iphone is very late to introduce it?
Google assistant is still have better accuracy then ios siri.
Google Maps is still a way better then IOS Apple Maps.
do you know apple have implemented 3D street view now as the Google Maps have already integrated a while ago.
Subramanian CN, 02 Oct 2019Which is the best, Open Source or Closed Source? There is no one word answer to this. It depen... moreLOL closed source close when their company close. See the Symbian, MeeGo.
But open source never does like android.
Open Source have many contributors which will make the platform feature rich.
Which is the best, Open Source or Closed Source? There is no one word answer to this. It depends upon the end user. For a mobile, I prefer a Closed Source just because of its security. iOS is more secured than Android. Open Source software is a free product, the best example being Linux. But a Closed Source Software is always costly. This cost can be adjusted if the owner of the Software wishes. For example if Apple wishes they can manufacture budget devices. Microsoft Mobile entered the scene to strike a balance between the two. Despite being a Closed Source they wanted to be both like Android and Apple, the reason why they acquired Nokia. (The biggest mistake made by Microsoft - Acquiring Nokia). I am writing about Microsoft here just because it has been referred by another post here. Speaking more about Microsoft is irrelevant here. Open Source being free can be used by anyone. Even Apple and Microsoft can use and implement Android if they wish. But Play Store is a Closed Software App. It belongs only to Google. Google earns only through Play Store License, Android One License, Sharing profits by selling Apps through their Play Store and Pixel devices. Though Android is open for all it has indirectly become the property of Google since no one uses it. This is the reason why Google takes pain in developing Android. But things have changed with Huawei. The Play Store app makes Android useless without it. Open Source Software being Open, it has no doors. Anyone can easily hack into it. But iOS being a Closed Source shuts their doors to hackers rendering high security. Apple calls for hackers to hack their iOS system to find out if there are any doors left open. A brilliant move by Apple. Things don't end here. I can discuss plenty of things if time is not a constraint. Wishing everyone Good Luck.
M.R.C, 30 Sep 2019Nokia is good but it,s still far behind from others.I mean come on SD6xx in 2019! That,s far o... moreSD doesn't make a difference if the bench mark scores are not that much outdated
sohail shafayat, 01 Oct 2019ok, help me learn the benefits of an open-source OS to a customer end. I know that you believe in Closed Source Operating System as you've talked about Windows Mobile. But, speaking about Windows Mobile here is beyond the scope as they have decided to end their services. Secondly, a person who believes in iOS shouldn't make an appearance here just to say that he likes their nonexisting competitor (Microsoft). If you really believe in iOS then please try to help the world by saying something about it. You may explain the benefits of Closed Source Operating System. There is no point in arguing about anything irrelevant. Good Luck.
sohail shafayat, 01 Oct 2019ok, help me learn the benefits of an open-source OS to a customer end. As you have asked for help I shall help you, but I will not teach anyone because I always like to be a friend than being a teacher. Which is safer; being in a closed house when there are plenty of dinosaurs outside or escaping to a forest which has plenty of wolfs. There is nothing wrong being ignorant but it would become a crime if you don't get enlightened. Everything is available in the www. It is just enough, if you develop the thirst for learning.