Sand-E, 20 May 2012dey shuld tag it with "A camera with fone capabilities" ;P But that feature list is one of the longest phone feature lists on GSMArena!
"belle"fp1 could do wonders to Nokia if so desires. Coz, a single core could managed well 1080 @ 30fps HD video recording together with memory card reader slot and 41 MP complex operating system camera.
20 days back i had a hands on experience of this device. In short i can a say its a awesome camera phone or " A camera with full of mobile phone feature". In full resolution mode camera resolution is 38MP & size of image is 6-7MB.
fredd, 20 May 2012errrp... with 41MP and only 16 GB storage... my maths tells me you can take about 3 photos... moreread about the device before bashing, the pureview technology allows us to save crisp pictures at different resolutions that's approx 1mb. phone also supports microsd cards up to 32 gb.
hey guys ,, can anyone tell me when this phone will be available in south africa , (cape town) ?
juz, 27 Feb 2012OMG! 41MP camera? Unbelievable, how great it is, can it beat the Dslr Cameras?? The OS is rea... moreDont complain at Nokia,complain to your android phone maker why they dont spend more time in making a amazing camera phone..lol..quad core and xxxx ppi and xxxx ram and so on..and no descent camera.Belle and further update will make this one last long time.a 2 year old N8 is still no1 in camera until this one is released,
Anonymous, 18 May 2012For the same reason of who needs a dual core or quad core. No one needs this is this days, but... moreAs long as it performs well in the real-world setting, why care about how many cores a device has? Of course, faster is better, but going into overkill is not cool. Who will use that much processing power on a regular basis in a smartphone? It's not like people who own smartphones do mainstream video authoring and photo editing on their phones. As for launching applications, an average of 2 second delay at most would be acceptable. To put it in PC terms, you wouldn't buy an i7, 8GB 1600DDR3, 2TB, 580GT build of PC for Internet, basic photo editing and office applications only, right?
Multi-cores are only for those who do real multitasking, and I am not taking about the OS, I am referring to the USER. How often does one run multiple power-hungry apps, frequently switch among them, and have at least one do some processing in the background? Example: Basic photo editing, HD video conversion/processing, HD video authoring, audio processing, HD video/audio playback. That situation is where you WILL need multi-cores. For apps that don't do background processing, multi-cores are just a waste of money.
To anyone who is curious, that example I provided above is my own, which only rarely happens, and happens on my Core2Duo 2.93GhZ, 4GB DDR2 9800GT system. Slow, but not enough to make me shell out more money for an i7 system.
errrp... with 41MP and only 16 GB storage...
my maths tells me you can take about 3 photos before its full. winner!
How nice if this phone is relase android & symbian version. Well of course i would buy android!
what a waste a good camera phone load with symbian :(
nokia pureview is very good camera sensor phone , people hate for symbian but symbian is very good and easy os and belle fp1 update is very good because nokia os is not loser for android or window os
if only nokia had used cortex a8 or a9 processors on this phone. then we would see what symbian is really capable of.
joe, 19 May 2012considering the specifications it's not worth the price at all..samsung galaxy ace/2 offers be... moreName me one phone which got similar specs and not worth it! Well you can't , no other phone has such big camera sensor and no other mobile OS can support such too. Symbian has it's lovers, don't hate, appreciate such innovation