Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012jeez...you don't really read right?aw.. can you read too? android is loosing dude.. open 8 apps for android, in less than a minute, it will restart.. open 8 apps for symbian, still works good.. tsk3x.. the shame....
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012 i did not go to any specifics because am not bashing. but since you want to...let me ask ... moreaw, come on.. you can find a lot of 3D games only with one app market for Nokia(OVI store) while having difficulty finding such 3D games for 2 app market like Android Market and Samsung Apps, and some of these games from OVI store cost more cheaper than Android's( for ex.: Asphalt 6 HD game, OVI store: $1 or less; Android Market: $ 4 or more. does android have the TV-out function that can use any TV-out chord? i guess not. USB on-the-go function? HDMI function? i guess not too.. Browsing Issues? that only depends on the network or WLAN structure speed. Price? phht!! android is more expensive than symbian with more features. tsk3x. you're just posting comments under symbian phones because you're beginning to lose hope that Android is still winning over symbian.. grow up and take out that pacifier from your mouth dude..
AnonD-48570, 09 Apr 2012The efficiency of Symbian OS seems to be more innovative than what Android has. Symbian create... more
i did not go to any specifics because am not bashing.
but since you want to...let me ask you this...
what are the games you can play on symbian that has 3D graphics?
Compare the applications you can use in symbian
to the applications available in android.
symbian applications are basically obselete
Browsing speed? hell...from your comment
you even haven't got the chance to compare
symbian browsing experience to the android ones.
read this kid if you know what you are defending.
for speed? do you really need to metion that?
come now...give me a benchmarking info
on SYmbian vs. Android from a credible site?
Try convincing me and other
possible buyers reading right now.
you can come up w/ it, then your not worth noticing
on any post.
AnonD-48570, 09 Apr 2012The efficiency of Symbian OS seems to be more innovative than what Android has. Symbian create... moreJust yesterday I had to take out my Samsung Galaxy Ace to take a picture then check in Foursquare. For 20 long minutes the screen froze and nothing can be done.
Fortunately I had my Nokia S60V3FP1 device with Foursquare. Took a picture, checked in. My friends located me in an instant.
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012"operating system (OS) itself is more powerful than Android. Android requires more powerf... moreThe efficiency of Symbian OS seems to be more innovative than what Android has. Symbian created the most complete user experience without compromising one important factor of being smart, Efficiency.
I agree and understand that Android needs to have multiple core processors plus a more powerful GPU to unleash its true potential. Yet the advantage you said about android was just OS customization, you have not included faster gaming, faster browsing, etc. And the most important is faster battery life plus a faster Phone upgrade because the OS upgrades require a Faster CPU and GPU and a HIGHER DPI. In conclusion, Milk drains faster, Money depletes faster, your Life goes faster, you'll die faster. LOL. Just like the fate of android. All about being fast.
Unlike symbian, even a 4 year old s60v3 can still compete with android phone these days. Not to mention, it also has a true OS customization. May also be the first to have os customization.
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012 am here on a peaceful walk at the park, stopped by on a discussion continued walking. then ... moreI agree.let nokia A little more homework on symbian and its anyday better than the android!
your gonna loose possible converts on the way you reply to other people's post.
instead of offering an INTELLIGENT discussion, you just troll around.
no wonder why most nokia fanboys are kids, or...erm... think like kids.
AnonD-20711, 09 Apr 2012of course its worth checking...shut up and start saving....you make a lot or noise whereas you... more
am here on a peaceful walk at the park, stopped by on a discussion continued walking. then suddenly a danthale shouted! don't discourage buyers.
was not here to bash 'coz there isn't any reason to do so... i even sided w/ nokia fanboys on this article:
maybe it would be best to sharpen your comprehension, anyone who says things other than what you want to hear is discouraging customers for you.
go back to school.
AnonD-20711, 09 Apr 2012of course its worth checking...shut up and start saving....you make a lot or noise whereas you... morecan you....repost any of my previous comments that discourages buyers?
my grandma keeps telling me that "if you give meaning to evrything, in a few months time, you will be a thick dusty dictionary"
AnonD-20711, 09 Apr 2012i've compared....and what i saw, dual cores against single cores...the big stomached cow that ... more
oooohhhh...pretty sensitive...did i hit a G-spot?
farmer's logic eh?
ok then... am pretty much sure that the cow w/ a bigger stomach would and could till more grounds than your...ehem....your cow.
seems a fair trade for me... spend on more fodder for more tilled land.
[deleted post]of course its worth checking...shut up and start saving....you make a lot or noise whereas you already have cash ready to purchase it. Stop discouraging others from buying it, they will be enough for all of us...
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012 and since when did symbian became a powerhouse? lemme tell you this. symbian was great. ... morei've compared....and what i saw, dual cores against single cores...the big stomached cow that ate all the fodder, none left for tomorrow so it suffered from malnutrition. What if it had a smaller stomach, designed in another more compact way, it i'd have eaten less, saved food and produced same amount of milk if not more, for longer!
the next pureview can most probably a lumia. a windows phone. i would rejoice if it is a symbian clara.
AnonD-44031, 09 Apr 2012Since when did it become a powerhouse? Since the Nokia 7650. The first smartphone with multita... more"operating system (OS) itself is more powerful than Android. Android requires more powerful hardware and more battery power to do the same tasks that Symbian can do but with less-powerful hardware and with little battery consumption. "
That's my point.you said "Android requires more powerful hardware and more battery power ".
Basically i would have agreed if he said more efficient.
Symbian is great, but it's a dawn of the new age. it's just now a member of the pack, not the leader of it.
if you would notice, the humored next pureview is a LUMIA. So 808 seems to be just a testing ground of the technology.
I would praise Nokia if they would just concentrate on the symbian OS. i used to one and this android fanboy say symbian rocks.
The advantage that android has over symbian or any other OS is customization, you can customize it to your liking. and android leads the pack for technological advancement right now NOT because it requires hardware or more power and higher specs, it's because of the manufacturers harnessing the OS' true potential thus they innovate applications and new hardwares, had it's not symbian who forced the industry to move on to dual, quadcores, it was Android. and people say it's because android cannot run on minimal hardware specs? says who? you can run it, but it's capabilities would be limited. is that bad? yes and no. yes because you can't use it's full potential, and no...it's normal because hardware specs limits what droids can do but that does not mean, it's less efficient.
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012 Nokia(LOKI): i have a Fanboy army Google(TONY STARK): oh...*laughs we have hulk. read GSMARENAYou do realize that you just compared a god with mortals, right? :)
Verbal_Criminal, 09 Apr 2012
and since when did symbian became a powerhouse?
lemme tell you this. symbian was great. ... moreSince when did it become a powerhouse? Since the Nokia 7650. The first smartphone with multitasking.
There is no "compare" button for Symbian and Android. Only the phones can be compared, not the Operating Systems. Please open Wikipedia and do your research, or open some websites about what technically Symbian and Android are.
Actually, Symbian IS a powerhouse. the operating system (OS) itself is more powerful than Android. Android requires more powerful hardware and more battery power to do the same tasks that Symbian can do but with less-powerful hardware and with little battery consumption. Want proof? Look at ICS and Belle (Symbian and Android's latest OS). ICS uses battery power like there's no tomorrow (literally), because just look at complaints from users of ICS. Do you see the same complaints from Belle?
How about App compatibility? Android is already facing fragmentation problems. Search GSMArena for that article. Do you see such problems with Belle? No.
How about folders to organize all those app icons in the main menu?
And who said that Android is truly effective with multiple cores? ONLY the OS needs the multiple cores. Almost all apps were written without optimizations for multiple cores.