Anonymous, 02 Mar 2012first of all, 360 x 640 pixels and 184 ppi??? this just makes the phone suck and whats the use... moreProof, please? I am curious how this phone actually performs, but I don't see any reviews. The only things I've seen are the videos of product demos.
I might agree with you that the pixel density can look bad on the display. As for the 41Mpix, honestly, are you going to use the full resolution without transferring it to the PC or maybe display it on the TV to show to everyone? Nobody is required to take full 38Mpix photos. If you want lesser (8, 5 or 3 Mpix), then it is your choice. You rage about specs that you consider weak, but also rage about over-powered specs?
This is actual proof of how ironic people can be.
Nokia have gone mad .... seriosly a 41 MP Camera, but nothing else to match like cpu, memory, ram, screen, resolution, output ports, software ...
how in the world did they discover this ?
i think they were just tinkering and stretching the pixels and there was a blast resulting in 41MP and they just said wow lets release it ... ha ha :)
[deleted post]Uhm.. You seem to have replied to the wrong post. I did not say ANYTHING about dual and quad-cores lacking in performance. I did not also say that I am sure this device will perform as marketed. Read carefully, please!
As for your one question: Personal preference. If a person wants to buy this phone for its 41Mpix, would you say 'no'?
I'll tell you my real reasons for wanting this phone anyway: It is better than the N8. I wanted the N8, but because I was told by a trusted source that this is coming out, I decided to watch out for this. I liked the N8 for it's features, and since this is an improvement.. well... it might to safe to say that this is better than the N8.
first of all, 360 x 640 pixels and 184 ppi??? this just makes the phone suck and whats the use of taking 41MP photos when the screen sucks??? and then theres 512 MB RAM and single core 1.3 GHzARM 11. this phone is gonna lag and people will furiously hate that. I would just say this phone isnt a phone, its a camera and these specs dont beat any android or apple phone , this phone is gonna suck.
Anonymous, 02 Mar 2012That is dumb to say cause for a phone to work well it relies on those thingsYeah. You did not understand my point. What I meant was, as long as the phone works well and it is fast enough, I won't be raging about why not this, why not that. Most especially when ONLY the specs are out, and not the actual benchmarks/reviews.
Also, why dumb? Are you saying that real-world performance doesn't matter as long as the specs are high-end?
You can have a poorly optimized software with a high-class hardware the performs just as well as a mid-range hardware on a very optimized software. It all depends on how all the parts work together as one.
azzxuri, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meNokia is still locked in the Multimedia world.
Accept the fact fandroids are JEALOUS to this phone..dont care about they say,,,I just love this pHONE.... :)
Everything is Fine, it is a nice actually, But WTF is 1400mAH ???????????????
mushroom, 01 Mar 2012if you say so then a phone is not for media player,camera,internet browser,sms,or even colour screenindeed, but a SMARTphone can be.
azzxuri, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meno
azzxuri, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meyes obviously
So many trolls..
Are we forgetting the most important thing?
Real-world performance is what counts the most!
I need a phone that performs very well in real life. I don't care how many cores it has, what it's rated speeds are, how much RAM or what GPU they are using. As long as it performs very well according to how it was marketed and if fits my needs (and wants), then this phone will have my vote.
Khadim, 02 Mar 2012Now that is something. Eventually Nokia Decided to get back in the game. Goodthey tried hard but in vain, they r no longer in the race, very soon nokia will be manuf. only digi cams becos they are not smart enuf to produce smartphones.
41mp camera, 100mp from Nokia won't make any diff. Its not as if its gona be taking stunning pictures. Digital cameras with 8mp will produce better pixs. With 184ppi screen am sure this will really be a dull screen. Hey, I currently use Nokia N8 wit 12mp camera bla bla bla but the pictures i take have never been extra ordinary. So Nokia plz try something else bcos most other phones with even 8mp camera will compete favourably with this phone in terms of photo quality. The specifications are not eye brow raising either, no hotspot and adobe flash in 2012 phone? Disappointingly embarrassing!