[deleted post]Go with ur table tenis samsung fon,we have already projectors in our school and office,,sory pathetic blue this 808 is intended for photography, and whts the problem,,,i think samsung is now confuse on how the nokia belle do that,..die by ur insecurity to the new tech by nokia,lolz
those who want to buy this phone, buy it! you will not regret. nokia is a trusted one. those who are criticizing this phone go with your androids and let us see the difference.
41mp in 1.3ghz singlecore with 512mb ram?amazing!!is there any other OS cn do this,?nothing but only the symbian belle,
Even android,ios,rim,windows,cnt do this
NO!there is still one OS cn do these,ThE MEEGO,also frome Nokia!!great nokia,
Nokia 808 PureView is good phone but its future is only 41 mp camera. but its Display Resolution is 640 X 360 is Regular type. & Many Futures is Regular Type.
[deleted post]Haha the mest award was left a little latter for the great Nokia 808 PureView "Best New Mobile Handset, Device or Tablet at Mobile World Congress 2012" http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_808_pureview_wins_best_new_device_at_mwc-news-3919.php
I smell blu is from samsung,,,,a table tenis phone maker,lolz,,i love nokia and belle, first time in history of smartphone!cheers nokia!!period
[deleted post]Then buy dlsr!!!dnt complain here!,,ok,u juz show us how stupid mind u have.how pathetic u are!ew!!.go with ur crapdoirds like galaxy beam,who has a quadcore jus to run 12mp,poor!!ew!
I think this specifications is complete n last in mobile world..
AnonD-44724, 02 Mar 2012its a stupid phone! lets just be honest ! i mean nokia truly sucks! they still cant get a dual... moreIn what thing did htc one x is amazing?numerous cores?lolz go witch ur numerous cores htc fon,u are jz angry cuz htc ddnt recieve the award in MWC 2012,LOZ,howp pathetic,
[deleted post]Cuz belle dnt need a dualcore to run 41mp,unlike crapdroids they need at least 20 cores,4ghz cpu and 3000mah to run this ,go with ur numerous cores.get the hell out of here go with ur crapdroids,
Takenote!wait for the symbian donna,,its a dual core.
its a stupid phone! lets just be honest ! i mean nokia truly sucks! they still cant get a dual core smartphone out! their phones deliver disappointing performance! this one is no exception ! the design is poor! just putting an impressive camera doesnt make it better or anything! ........where we have the new htc one X with beats..nvidia tegra ..quad core...impressive camera...classy nd stylish design...HD display...android 4.0..htc sense!! now beat that!
I think N808 it is the king of the camera.and will make the end
of tenology for camera phone...lol
41 MP is it true.. y cant other brands cant able afford for tht??
[deleted post]I am so sorry to say that your babbling will lead to nothing. No matter what happens, there will be buyers of this phone. You don't even know what other people think, and yet you prejudice that only few will buy this, oh come on.
[deleted post]Lucky that Nokia isn't a one handset manufacturer then.. There are lots to choose fom if you're not fussed about the camera.
AnonD-44031, 02 Mar 2012Proof, please? I am curious how this phone actually performs, but I don't see any reviews. The... moreThen who needs dual cores n quad cores when the battery technology is nt upto that . . . . No other phone can take 1080p vid in a single processor that's an amazing feet
Camera is a monsterious... But other than that, nothing special... Sorry nokia...
Anonymous, 02 Mar 2012first of all, 360 x 640 pixels and 184 ppi??? this just makes the phone suck and whats the use... moreIf you consider the speed this phone open large photos and zoom in, then with just a little brain, you would realise that this phone is VERY SMOOTH and WIL NOT LAG!
After years of redundancy, we have to admit, now Nokia really makes a great innovation. Bravo on that. I'm not really impressed about the bulky, monstrous camera, but the technology sure is impressive. Never thought a mobile phone would be able to take a picture with such clarity--not even standard P&S can match it.
But well, some aspects are sacrificed here--I'm mostly disappointed by the screen's pixel density.
For those who don't really like Nokia but want superior mobile imaging capability--like me--let's just wait till the technology trickles down to other brands of smartphones :D Until then, salute to Nokia!