azzxuri u need a mobile? is nokia 808 not a mobile? hahaha.. maybe you did not know it is a phone a smart one.
Well...I have read most of the comments.You see symbian actually doesnt need a very fast processor like the `heavy` android or ios.I think 1.3ghz is ok (how much processor speed is there in a dslr?),though i felt that 1ghz RAM would have been gr8.808 has effective pixels of 38mp.and the images are fantastic.Well most of us do need to click for images every now and then.but over all 808 is really great and who said there is no apps????
i love to see the development symbian. It is the first excellent camera phone. I hope nokia will get improvement on software in symbian.808 is very nice smart phone with good camera ;but it should run with symbian^6 to be ahead of samsung and iphone
What is so bad about Belle? Please tell one thing android/iphone can do that symbian or belle can't? Not only can belle run most* apps, it comes with many useful feature such as fm transmitter, excellent navigator, doc viewer/edit, rugged/excellent built quality (high end nokias.) Nokia perform excellently at what it's design to do...all camera features aside...
is that for real? 41mp :| are you kidding me that"S insane cant be true
nigel, 02 Mar 2012no matter how many thousand pixel does the camera generate, it will never match up to a dslr, ... moreno matter how good your DSLR is, you will never be able to pocket it, browse with it, call with it, or send a message with it.
Helga, 02 Mar 2012Nothing new! Who need 41mp sensor and noise pictures??? C'moon Nokia! Give us better batter... moreread this before you make stupid comments and shame yourself: http://europe.nokia.com/PRODUCT_METADATA_0/Products/Phones/8000-series/808/Nokia808PureView_Whitepaper.pdf
azzxuri, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meby "most of the guys" you mean fandroids and ios fans right? if yes, then i'm sure they agree with you.Ü
id, 01 Mar 2012360X640 r u kiddin me? Wid a camera dat gr8 nd resoultn so poor very dissapointedI'm guessing that you don't have an HDTV...
maril8, 01 Mar 2012who would want a 41mp camera on their mobile phones? and fyi, it says 38mp effective. Google c... morewho would want a 41mp camera on their phone? just... everyone! if you can have it, then why not?
Oh, and you say google can compete with this? I would love to see some proofs!
[deleted post]Too bad they’ve picked Nokia Belle as the
OS of choice?? Can u suggest nokia to use other os when other os like windows phone Or android can't handle 41 MP camera sensor!! and FYI, pureview technology has been in development since 5 years ago..an at that time android or wp is not exists..so deal with that..
azzxuri, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meso dont comment here. you should look on the below $20 phones with monochrome LCD. try your luck!
All phones hv adv and disadv.Apple battry life is not good however its price is more then all others phone.
If people want every thing in mobile then got tab.Because cell is small in size.
Anonymous, 01 Mar 201241 MP!! I dun undrstand what is the use of a 41 mp sensor when there is no optical zoom.. Com... moreYou are the one who needs to grow up and study. Review the product first before making stupid comments. The "pureview" method is capturing a 38mp image with a 5mp resolution, thus resulting to a very detail-rich image. It enables zooming the image even up to 4x without losing detail, which is almost the same as having optical zoom.