AnonD-22804, 02 Mar 2012Nokia please dudes adopt Android...the phone is totally amazing...please just don't compel me ... moreif you were to get the 808 you'll soon find that you're leaving your android device @ home because the 808 with Belle is more than sufficient on its own
Just in Case anyone is wondering what the 808s housing is made out of
It's been confirmed by Damian Dinning that the main housing is made up of
Polycarbonate with a ceramic coating like the White N9s and Lumia 800/900s
Stainless Steel for the buttons and
Gorilla Glass, curved, for the screen and lens area the front is like the N9s curved screen
Now that is something. Eventually Nokia Decided to get back in the game. Good
AnonD-28191, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meright
im glad that nokiadidnt go for resource hog android/crap
nokia belle roxxx.. Thatnk u nokia
azzxuri u need a mobile? is nokia 808 not a mobile? hahaha.. maybe you did not know it is a phone a smart one.
Well...I have read most of the comments.You see symbian actually doesnt need a very fast processor like the `heavy` android or ios.I think 1.3ghz is ok (how much processor speed is there in a dslr?),though i felt that 1ghz RAM would have been gr8.808 has effective pixels of 38mp.and the images are fantastic.Well most of us do need to click for images every now and then.but over all 808 is really great and who said there is no apps????
i love to see the development symbian. It is the first excellent camera phone. I hope nokia will get improvement on software in symbian.808 is very nice smart phone with good camera ;but it should run with symbian^6 to be ahead of samsung and iphone
What is so bad about Belle? Please tell one thing android/iphone can do that symbian or belle can't? Not only can belle run most* apps, it comes with many useful feature such as fm transmitter, excellent navigator, doc viewer/edit, rugged/excellent built quality (high end nokias.) Nokia perform excellently at what it's design to do...all camera features aside...
is that for real? 41mp :| are you kidding me that"S insane cant be true
nigel, 02 Mar 2012no matter how many thousand pixel does the camera generate, it will never match up to a dslr, ... moreno matter how good your DSLR is, you will never be able to pocket it, browse with it, call with it, or send a message with it.
AnonD-44064, 02 Mar 2012Nothing new! Who need 41mp sensor and noise pictures??? C'moon Nokia! Give us better batter... moreread this before you make stupid comments and shame yourself: http://europe.nokia.com/PRODUCT_METADATA_0/Products/Phones/8000-series/808/Nokia808PureView_Whitepaper.pdf
AnonD-28191, 01 Mar 2012i need a mobile not a camera :P i think most of the guys agree with meby "most of the guys" you mean fandroids and ios fans right? if yes, then i'm sure they agree with you.Ü
id, 01 Mar 2012360X640 r u kiddin me? Wid a camera dat gr8 nd resoultn so poor very dissapointedI'm guessing that you don't have an HDTV...
maril8, 01 Mar 2012who would want a 41mp camera on their mobile phones? and fyi, it says 38mp effective. Google c... morewho would want a 41mp camera on their phone? just... everyone! if you can have it, then why not?
Oh, and you say google can compete with this? I would love to see some proofs!