Jee, 28 Feb 2012Even if it was a 41mp or either it has more than 1ghz processor or a more than 512mb ram behin... moreandroid need highier hardware, memory and so on to run their apps, thats fact.. why bother about processor or memory if they dont need it, the only bad about symbian just low apps, thats all
nokia has done it again, who wouldn't want a phone like this,cos i would and cant wait to lay my hands on this..i might shot a video with this phone.
[deleted post]yes, the battery life is lower compared to other symbian phones because of that beast in the buldge of n808.
[deleted post]It's more like others coming here not knowing facts and stating total opposite of what the Pureview technology is & capabilities.
[deleted post]Ur droids lag untill u get high end requirement. Look at htc one x. That needs a quad core cpu to handle 8 mp camera
AnonD-30640, 28 Feb 2012I bet that he doesnt know what is S40 !A confined person can't know about an encyclopedia
Nokia 808 PureView
360 x 640 pixels, 4.0 inches (~184 ppi pixel density)
360 x 640 pixels, 3.5 inches (~210 ppi pixel density)
Why they make Nokia 808 such low PPI?????
I want to buy it but why why why :(
I think symbian has much to improve in its application support:-) where as android has more than 4.5+ apps support:-) so most likely to prefer android mobiles:-)
[deleted post]You say its our blind faith over nokia but its our trust over nokia. Let me clear one thing, you say na your android is very advanced, your browser are much better than nokia symbian's...we had a downloading test of merely 636kb file with samsung galaxy s, champ and nokia c1-01. And even s40 os beated your galaxy s..it downloaded the file in just 6 seconds and ur android was struggling at 120kb
People and droidboys, lets get to the question: In what dimention(s) Android cams are better than 808's?
this phone is awesome.it has 1.3 ghz processor 512 mb ram and 41 mp camera.u got everything what u need in a phone.nokia rockzzzz
AnonD-44302, 28 Feb 2012check again....i didnt asked nething lyk dat hahaha....dat seems crazyYou and your android need mercy
[deleted post]oh so wat r u doing frm past half an hour if not noticing....dats wat i said b4, u will percept only wat ur mind is capable of
AnonD-44302, 28 Feb 2012At last---my questions r still unanswered...give a thoughtU asked can it play music when theres no battery in it. We dont want to answer any nonsense. Be logical.
well seriously, after going tnrough this long debate. let's majlke some points very clear
1) Android will not get 41 mp. Even if it gets it'll need atleast 8 cores.
2) android has a large fan+app base which symbian does not currently enjoy.
3; android users keep demanding for higher specifications while symbian does not require high requirements because it is optimised to save ram and it does it's task effeciently
4)symbian is developing faster than android - see the leap from n97/5800 os to belle . You will get what I am saying.
5) Symbian is inferior in some cases wrt android but don't call it a dumb os please!
6) android is open source officially while symbian is closed source officially- though unofficially it has been leaked by Coderus-he's a great modder.
7) please don't compare the hardware requirements of sulymbian and android. They are totally different and irrelavant in context of symbian.
hope I have made myself very very clear.