C2-01 is not qualified to be part of nokia phoneline. It lack every bit of quality nokia used to deliver
V.balaji, 07 Nov 2011Apparently both cedar , c2 are good phones but it is better to go with c2 because
-advance gp... more-my cedar and my x2 got same 2g data speeds and both are max 48kbps bandwidth unlike the class different, speed different as in samsung and nokia.
-java version is midp 2.1 in both phones. Just that gsmarena have'nt yet updated it. If doubtful, access cedar's filesys or firmware info files.
- downloads are available for all phones from all sites
- a lot of pre-loaded apps are there in cedar too.
- firmware can be updated in both and its not just one.
- 2mp camera got the clarity of 5250 and such, so which is better?
- what u think? Cedar doesnt got 3.5mm jack?
- we can add anything or everything as homescreen widget with a little files. Even set apps as wallpaper. (Corresponding file when fed into system)
- just read gsmarena review of c2-01 to know the 'magnificence' of its display. :-D
- multitasking in c2-01 (music player and opera) ? Thats not multitasking. Ok.
-rds stereo is in cedar too. Besides got stereo widening.
First atleast go check cedar or my review here, then argue please.
DEV, 08 Nov 2011Well. Good work.
Anyway not everyone was a hardcore user like you to worry about right from v... moreHahahahahahahaha.
Man will u please stop that.
Your buddies cedar got software pblms?
So far cedar's is the most stable feature phone os i've ever encountered.
Nokia and samsung java got any minor issues as usage goes. Like restarts, hangs, corrupt messages. Any such thing. But my cedar even after six months of terrible, harsh, severly careless usage didnt got a single pblm both hardware and software.
And playing vga aint hardcore use. If some s60 phone or mid-levl smartphone send u a recorded or their resolution video, you got to connect to pc to play that, well we who own cedar dont. And its called useful one and not hardcore use.
And playing vga in qvga means its super-multiplied clarity. Due to higher n.o of accumulated pixels in the video than the display. Same effect as playing a 1080i video in a computer screen. Highly defined.
And cedar got hspa 3g with 7,2mbps where ase c2-01 got umts, deadslow and waste of 3g plan if activated.
AnonD-13154, 07 Nov 2011Heres the true full-review of c2-01 and cedar.
c2- bandwidth 376kbps , no hsdp... moreWell. Good work.
Anyway not everyone was a hardcore user like you to worry about right from viewing angles to VGA(etc) video playback that too in a QVGA resolution screen.
I'm using this mobile for 6 months without any problem except restarting while applying themes and that too is very rare.
All the features specified here are working fine.
At the same time my close friend's cedar(bought 2months ago) was most of the times in service center owing to some software problems.
Mind one thing there more than specifications to go for a mobile.
i have purchased this phone and the camera is so good that u can even see the faces of people inside a running car which is at a distance of 20 feet...great phone ...use it.
This mobile is ok for d money paid.. But d camera quality is not so gud.. Its only average..! Music quality is above average..
Coming to 3G its a waste of money..! It supports only UTMS network..:( no HSDPA/HSUPA/HSPA.. The max speed is upto 384kbps only.., download speed wil become slow aftr 2months usage of tis phone.. So 3G internet packs hv to b used.. & the 3G packs cost more...!:(
if ur main use of the mobile s for txtng, networking, etc thn tis mobil is gud for u... But if ur lookin for a mobil which has vry fast internet & othr gud specs thn tis mobil is a waste for u.. So dont prefer tis mobil... Its a waste..!
vegas, 07 Nov 2011can somebody post a short video made with c201 ? I want to buy it but reviews say video is not... moreOh its not a dark video dude.
Thats the video clarity of c2-01.
I hope you got my point, c2-01 is a terrible video recorder and player
anil bharat, 07 Nov 2011nokia c2-01 is verry good fone from internet.is it true? c2-01 is from internet? wow amazing discovery made by u, i thought its from nokia ha ha ha
Apparently both cedar , c2 are good phones but it is better to go with c2 because
-advance gprs class 32
-latest java version
-downloads from all third party sites
-pre loaded ovi apps
-cedar has less homescreen widgets compared to c2
-multitasking can run 2 apps at a time
AnonD-13154, 07 Nov 2011Heres the true full-review of c2-01 and cedar. NETWORK 3g- c2- bandwidth 376kbps , no hsdp... moreThanks, thanks and thanks you saved my money. Now I will try to find out any other phone. By the way last time I have very bad experience with Nokia phone.
can somebody post a short video made with c201 ? I want to buy it but reviews say video is not good. Gsmarena's review video is shot in half darkness.
SABA, 06 Nov 2011plz clear me.....
where i have to go nokia c2 or sony ericsson cedar?
how it overcome nokia... moreHeres the true full-review of c2-01 and cedar.
c2- bandwidth 376kbps , no hsdpa, hsupa.
Cedar- bandwidth upto 7.2mbps HSDPA 7.2mbps, HSUPA 2.5mbps.
C2- 2.0" TFT , tilted to all sides and colors are mixed up. Poor side view.
Cedar- 2.2" TFT, Only one side mixes up colors, that too better than what happens in c2. Better side views.
SPEAKER Loud. (Music)
Cedar- 62.8db (can be upgraded upto 68db changing audio driver)
C2- poor clarity, too high distortion compared to other phones.
Cedar- above average quality, better than x2.
C2- above average loudness with below average quality. Headset supplied is poor and below 350rs
Cedar- excellent loudness with outstanding quality. Slightly better than x2.
Headset supplied is good and costs 890rs in market.
hassled mp4 playback. Smooth playback ends after 680kbps @15fps.
Videos must be below 320*240 and 15fps else played as audio..
hassle free playback
Any resolution below 640*480, (else 'cannot play this video') , can be played qvga,wqvga,hvga,sqqhd,nHd 360p,ultra low hd,240p, vga...
C2- qvga at 15fps 3gp, when tested maximum bitrate ends up everytime below 550kbps.
Cedar- qvga at 30fps mp4. Max bitrate betwen 1400-1600, everytime tested. (Bitrate, frame per sec...etc based on media player classic's readings)
C2- 3.2mp, 2048x1536 resolution images.
Cedar- 2mp 1600x1200 resolution images.
C2- below par quality and often blurry and absorb less colors compared to x2. And even lower when with cedar
Cedar- pretty decent sensor, color absorbing and clarity almost par with great 2mp's like 5233, 5250.
C2- symbian 40 ver6.
Maximum java size 1mb
multitask is not there along with smartdial and various other goodies.
Display brightness cant be adjusted.
Alarm loudness is low.
Ericsson proprietory java
Unlimited java size and heap size. Works any .jar apps of even 9 and 10mb size for 5233.
Multitask is available, minimise even 10+ apps and the phone continues running smooth.
Smart dial is available.
Still java, and you can move .mp3 into music, .jpeg then to pictures..etc only. 'To unlock, enter code' feature isnt available
Can adjust brightness.
Can be modified in many ways using software just like using pc suite. Can upload new audio driver, camera driver, display driver,....
Change icons, install new computer fonts, softkeys with images..etc
Smart dial feature as advanced as in blackberry os.
.srt subtitle with videos.
Alarm is louder.
C2- good backup, usual nokia stuff.
27-33 hours under normal usage 6hr constant 3g downloading (umts,slowest 3g) backup
Cedar- very good backup, very rare for a sony
34-40 hours under normal usage. 13 hr in constant 3g downloading
C2- tough build, usual nokia standard.No shutter key
Cedar- tough build, rare for a sony. Dropped atleast 260+ times (lost count) and still no problem.No shutter key.
Vol keys double as next previous keys once playing music.
Both got 3.5mm jack
Both support microSD
Both got backlight alert for calls and sms.
Both can backup contacts from card, saved with nokia phones.
Both are from same price range, under 4500rs.. With a mere difference of 250-380rs between
If calling me bias, explain how am i?